PPI - Radically Pragmatic
  • Donate
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Careers
  • People
  • Projects
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Donate

Our Work

In Massachusetts, Race to the Top Spurs Reform

  • January 15, 2010
  • Elbert Ventura

The Massachusetts state House and Senate yesterday passed a major education overhaul bill, considered to be the most sweeping school legislation in the state in more than 15 years.

The bill calls for doubling the number of charter schools in districts that are in the lowest 10 percent of state assessment scores and grants new powers to superintendents, making it easier for them to dismiss teachers and lengthen school days (a policy that PPI supports).

The story might seem like a state matter, but it actually has broader relevance. Here’s the telling passage from the Boston Globe:

The bill represents a cornerstone of Patrick’s education agenda, which slightly more than a year ago appeared to be all but on hold as the state confronted ever-worsening budget woes.

But the effort was reignited last year at the prospect of receiving $250 million from President Obama’s Race to the Top competition, reserved for states aggressively pursuing overhauls of failing schools and expansions of charter schools.

Now state education officials are racing to meet a Tuesday deadline to submit their funding proposal, including a copy of the approved bill. They will send the hundreds of pages by express carrier, while a state official who will be in Washington Tuesday has agreed to drop off a backup copy.

Massachusetts students are typically among the top-performing students in the country. But when broken down along socio-economic lines, the results actually vary greatly, with black, Latino, and low-income students all lagging behind. By lifting the cap on charter schools, the bill allows charter schools with proven track records to replicate their methods and try to revitalize long moribund school districts.

With Race to the Top, the Obama administration made a bet that dangling financial incentives for states would prompt them to enact reforms that for years have been stuck in sclerotic legislatures. By combining money with reformist guidelines — for instance, Race to the Top’s insistence on a favorable policy toward charters — the administration is getting states and districts to consider and pass bold education policies without imposing onerous top-down orders. The Massachusetts education bill is a victory for the reform in the state, but it also augurs well for the national education reform landscape.

Related Work

In the News  |  June 12, 2025

Kahlenberg in The Assembly: One Critic of Race-Based Admissions Says Colleges Can Still Improve Diversity

  • Richard D. Kahlenberg
In the News  |  June 12, 2025

Kahlenberg in The New York Times: What Happens if ‘Harvard Is Not Harvard’?

  • Richard D. Kahlenberg
Op-Ed  |  June 6, 2025

Weinstein Jr. for Forbes: More Colleges Freeze Hiring And Suspend Salary Increases

  • Paul Weinstein Jr.
Op-Ed  |  June 5, 2025

Manno for Fusion Magazine: A Plan for Prudence

  • Bruno Manno
In the News  |  June 5, 2025

Kahlenberg on Reasonably Happy with Paul Ollinger: Has Affirmative Action FAILED?

  • Richard D. Kahlenberg
In the News  |  June 3, 2025

Kahlenberg in CBS News: Colleges are slightly less diverse as admissions officers seek ways to adapt post-affirmative action

  • Richard D. Kahlenberg
  • Never miss an update:

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
PPI Logo
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Donate
  • Careers
  • © 2025 Progressive Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved.
  • |
  • Privacy Policy
  • |
  • Privacy Settings