July 2025 | 1.69 million | |
July 2024 | 2.68 million |
WHAT THEY MEAN:
Then-President Ronald Reagan’s closing, bringing the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement into force in September 1988:
“Let the 5,000-mile border between Canada and the United States stand as a symbol for the future. No soldier stands guard to protect it. Barbed wire does not deface it. And no invisible barrier of economic suspicion and fear will extend it. Let it forever be not a point of division but a meeting place between our great and true friends.”
Reagan’s brief 729-word talk enthuses over the North American future in practical as well as idealistic terms — “lower prices for consumers, job galore for workers, new markets for producers”; “a rich flow of agriculture and energy resources from one country to another” — and takes some particular pride in the agreement’s innovative services provisions “in such areas as accounting, insurance, tourism, and engineering.”
A generation later, he doesn’t seem to have gotten much wrong. The U.S. and Canada have the world’s largest goods-trade relationship: $412 billion in Canadian energy, metals, grains, etc., serve American homes, utilities, and factories, while Canadians buy $350 billion in U.S. goods, more than any other country and fully a sixth of the U.S.’ $2.1 trillion worldwide export total. Nor was Reagan off on services and tourism. Last year, American figures show 20.1 million Canadian tourist arrivals, a number equivalent to half of the 41 million Canadians. An example from Las Vegas, an especially tourism-dependent city: Canadian visitors typically stay 5.5 days at a stretch, and spend more per day on hotels, shopping, and meals than anyone but Australians. By the University of Nevada/Las Vegas count, they support about 43,200 Clark County jobs, add $3.6 billion to Nevada GDP, and lift local per capita income by $368.
This is what Mr. Trump is inexplicably trying to throw away, beginning with a bad-faith Feb. 1 “emergency” decree citing border issues, in particular drug trafficking, as justification for a 25% tariff on Canadian-made goods. (Tariffs and bans on legal products are rarely if ever useful responses to narcotics issues, and there’s very little there anyway: per U.S. Customs and Border Protection stats report “northern border” patrols accounted for 0.1% of last year’s fentanyl seizures, 0% for heroin, 3% for marijuana, and 0.1% for methamphetamine.) Following that have come months of “51st state” insults and veiled threats, oscillating tariff decrees for cars and aluminum, and wholly unfounded claims that the U.S. is somehow “subsidizing” Canada.
This has done some visible economic harm to Canada — GDP growth down a point, unemployment and inflation visibly, if not drastically up — and brought a reaction, both from the Canadian public and in Canada’s larger strategy. That in turn is helping to sap American growth and employment. Two examples:
(1) Export losses: Canadians this summer have been looking for visibly American consumer goods, so as not to buy them. This has cut American wine, spirits, and beer exports by more than half, from $247 million in the first half of 2024 to $91 million so far this year, or by about 7 million gallons:
U.S. exports to Canada | Jan-June 2024 | Jan-June 2025 |
Wine | 24.4 million liters | 11.6 million liters |
Spirits | 9.1 million liters | 6.1 million liters |
Beer | 14.5 million liters | 6.9 million liters |
(2) Tourist visits: Much the same shows up in canceled air routes, lower searches for homes, and especially tourist visits. Just as they helped to show the success of North American integration through 2024, they now show unraveling and loss. StatCanada suggests Canadian tourist visits are down by a third: they counted 2.7 million returning Canadian cars in July 2024, and 1.7 million last month. As a particular case study, Las Vegas’s 1.4 million Canadian tourist visits make up more than a quarter of all international arrivals. This year’s sharp drop in Canadian arrivals has accordingly made 2025 a bad one, with total visitor counts down by more than 10% and Clark County unemployment rolls up by 8,000 from April to June.
“[L]ack of Canadian visitors to casino resorts is a significant factor in Las Vegas traffic falling … Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (LVCVA) and major casino operators data for June released this week showed that total visitation to the resort city fell by 11.3% to 3.1 million. June was the sixth month in a row in which the number of Vegas travelers fell year-over-year, but the first month in which the drop-off was in the double digits in more than four years.”
More generally, as jobs and income seep away out of U.S. casinos, distilleries, vineyards and hotels, an assessment this spring from Canadian Prime Minister Carney provides a chilly next-generation counterpoint to Reagan’s enthusiastic and then-bipartisan vision of trust, integration, and shared destiny:
“Our old relationship with the United States, a relationship based on steadily increasing integration, is over. … When I sit down with President Trump, it will be to discuss the future economic and security relationship between two sovereign nations. And it will be with our full knowledge that we have many, many other options than the United States to build prosperity for all Canadians.”
Those seeking a useful case study in folly and unprovoked self-harm won’t do much better than those. Those seeking a bright spot: Canadians probably haven’t quite given up. A recent Pew poll, for example, finds that while “approval” of the U.S. is badly down at 34%, and 59% of Canadians view the U.S. as their “greatest threat,” a slightly smaller majority of 55% also still thinks of the U.S. as “greatest ally.”
PPI’s four principles for response to tariffs and economic isolationism:
In better times:
Then-Pres. Reagan signs the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement, September 1988.
PM Mulroney pitches the idea to anxious Canadians, December 1987.
… and from the Canadian Embassy, U.S.-Canada state-by-state trade data.
Now:
The Trump administration’s Feb. 1 emergency decree claims a northern-border “emergency.”
… CBP drug-seizure stats don’t show one.
Up north:
PM Mark Carney assesses in April …
… responds to August 1 tariff threats: preserve USMCA, diversify Canada’s options, reform at home.
… and speculates on a Canada-EU future.
And the Pew Center polls Canadians on views of President Biden, Mr. Trump, and the United States.
Nevada focus:
StatCanada counts shrinking numbers of tourists returning home.
… Air Canada likewise.
UNLV’s Center for Business and Economic Research has research and data updates on Las Vegas, Clark County, and Nevada.
Las Vegas hotels and casinos gloomily report falling occupancy and revenue.
… and the Las Vegas Review-Journal concurs, finding the city’s employment rate the second-highest in the U.S. this year.
Hawaii’s tourist authority has a similar but not quite as bleak outlook.
Ed Gresser is Vice President and Director for Trade and Global Markets at PPI.
Ed returns to PPI after working for the think tank from 2001-2011. He most recently served as the Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Trade Policy and Economics at the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). In this position, he led USTR’s economic research unit from 2015-2021, and chaired the 21-agency Trade Policy Staff Committee.
Ed began his career on Capitol Hill before serving USTR as Policy Advisor to USTR Charlene Barshefsky from 1998 to 2001. He then led PPI’s Trade and Global Markets Project from 2001 to 2011. After PPI, he co-founded and directed the independent think tank ProgressiveEconomy until rejoining USTR in 2015. In 2013, the Washington International Trade Association presented him with its Lighthouse Award, awarded annually to an individual or group for significant contributions to trade policy.
Ed is the author of Freedom from Want: American Liberalism and the Global Economy (2007). He has published in a variety of journals and newspapers, and his research has been cited by leading academics and international organizations including the WTO, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund. He is a graduate of Stanford University and holds a Master’s Degree in International Affairs from Columbia Universities and a certificate from the Averell Harriman Institute for Advanced Study of the Soviet Union.