PPI - Radically Pragmatic
  • Donate
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Careers
  • People
  • Projects
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Donate

Our Work

PPI’s Moss Urges DC Council Not to Regulate Resale Ticketing and Focus Instead on Fighting the Live Nation-Ticketmaster Monopoly

  • October 20, 2025
  • Diana Moss
Download PDF

PPI’s Vice President and Director of Competition Policy, Diana Moss, has submitted written testimony in the DC Council’s upcoming October 22nd hearing on proposed B26-0224: Restricting Egregious Scalping Against Live Entertainment (RESALE) Amendment Act of 2025. PPI’s testimony opposes the legislation.

PPI’s testimony focuses on two provisions of the proposed legislation that would regulate or otherwise debilitate the competitive secondary (“resale”) ticketing market, while the anticompetitive primary ticketing market, which is monopolized by Live Nation-Ticketmaster, is allowed to operate unfettered. PPI respectfully suggests that the DC Council oppose “consumer protection” legislation that is, in reality, intended to stifle competition, to the detriment of consumers and artists.”

One provision in B26-0224 imposes price caps on the resale of live events tickets. A second provision allows a ticket issuer to restrict the transferability of tickets for sale in the resale market. Both of these provisions will stifle competition in resale, handing the live events monopolist, Live Nation-Ticketmaster, even more market power. This would be an indisputable win for Live Nation-Ticketmaster and a crushing loss for consumers and artists.

To protect competition in resale — which is indisputably the only source of competition in ticketing — PPI respectfully urges the DC Council to remove the price cap provision and amend the ticket transferability provision in B26-0224 to ensure unconditional ticket transferability. At the same time, PPI commends the drafters for including a provision to promote ticket price transparency. All-in pricing fosters consumer choice by providing the information necessary for consumers to make informed ticket-buying decisions. This will protect consumers, at the same time it spurs badly needed competition in ticketing, almost all of which comes from the resale market.

Read the full testimony.

 

Related Work

Press Release  |  September 4, 2025

Court Highlights DOJ Overreach and Refocuses on Consumer Welfare in Deciding Remedies in Google Search Monopolization Case

  • Diana Moss
Podcast  |  September 4, 2025

In Competition We Trust, Episode 2: How Private Antitrust Enforcers are Protecting Consumers

  • Diana Moss
Op-Ed  |  August 20, 2025

Moss for The Hill: The Misery of Auto Tariffs is Hitting Families and Factories

  • Diana Moss
Op-Ed  |  August 11, 2025

Moss for ProMarket: Weaponizing Antitrust and Regulation Will Hurt US Consumers

  • Diana Moss
Op-Ed  |  August 7, 2025

Moss for Jacksonville Journal-Courier: Antitrust Immunity for the NCAA? That’s a Foul

  • Diana Moss
Feature  |  July 31, 2025

The Future of Antitrust Conference and Contributions by the Panelists

  • Diana Moss
  • Never miss an update:

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
PPI Logo
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Donate
  • Careers
  • © 2025 Progressive Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved.
  • |
  • Privacy Policy
  • |
  • Privacy Settings