PPI - Radically Pragmatic
  • Donate
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Careers
  • People
  • Projects
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Donate

Our Work

New PPI Report Warns That DOJ’s Remedies in U.S. v. Google Could Short-Change Consumers

  • April 9, 2025
  • Diana Moss

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) monopolization case against online search giant Google has almost run its course. After a major win for the government last year, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is now considering remedies for restoring competition in the markets for online search. 

Today, the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) released a new report, “Antitrust Remedies and U.S. v. Google: Putting the Consumer Back into the ‘Fix,’” authored by Diana L. Moss, Vice President and Director of Competition Policy at PPI. The report unpacks the government’s proposed remedies against the backdrop of antitrust’s bedrock consumer welfare standard. The standard plays an important role in the District Court’s ultimate determination of whether the remedies in U.S. v. Google (2020) are in the public interest. 

“History is clear that consumers benefit from antitrust remedies that succeed in restoring competition in a market and bear the burden of those that fail,” said Moss. PPI’s report notes that the remedies debate is not over any single “fix” but the DOJ’s complex package of structural and conduct fixes designed to open up markets to competition by new search engines. 

Set against the complex backdrop of digital ecosystems, PPI argues that the DOJ’s remedies do not account for the impact on consumers under the full scope of the consumer welfare standard. This includes incentives to innovate and improve quality, such as protecting user privacy and data security. Moreover, the DOJ’s remedies entail a sweeping restructuring of the online search market and a decade of “quasi-regulation” of a standalone search platform — with lasting effects on the broader search ecosystem.

Moss explained that, “A strong remedy is needed to restore competition in online search, but the complexity of the government’s proposed fix could well have unintended, adverse effects on consumers.” The District Court has the unique opportunity in U.S. v. Google to ensure a strong remedy that restores competition while striking a better balance to protect consumers under the consumer welfare standard.

Read and download the report here.

The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) is a catalyst for policy innovation and political reform based in Washington, D.C. Its mission is to create radically pragmatic ideas for moving America beyond ideological and partisan deadlock. Learn more about PPI by visiting progressivepolicy.org. Find an expert at PPI and follow us on Twitter.

###

Media Contact: Alex Terr – aterr@ppionline.org

Related Work

Press Release  |  September 4, 2025

Court Highlights DOJ Overreach and Refocuses on Consumer Welfare in Deciding Remedies in Google Search Monopolization Case

  • Diana Moss
Op-Ed  |  August 20, 2025

Moss for The Hill: The Misery of Auto Tariffs is Hitting Families and Factories

  • Diana Moss
Op-Ed  |  August 11, 2025

Moss for ProMarket: Weaponizing Antitrust and Regulation Will Hurt US Consumers

  • Diana Moss
Op-Ed  |  August 7, 2025

Moss for Jacksonville Journal-Courier: Antitrust Immunity for the NCAA? That’s a Foul

  • Diana Moss
Feature  |  July 31, 2025

The Future of Antitrust Conference and Contributions by the Panelists

  • Diana Moss
Publication  |  July 31, 2025

A Defense of the ‘For Cause’ Termination Provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act

  • Andrew Gavil William E. Kovacic
  • Never miss an update:

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
PPI Logo
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Donate
  • Careers
  • © 2025 Progressive Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved.
  • |
  • Privacy Policy
  • |
  • Privacy Settings