PPI - Radically Pragmatic
  • Donate
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Careers
  • People
  • Projects
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Donate

Our Work

PPI Comments on Competition in Air Transportation

  • January 7, 2025
  • Diana Moss
Download PDF

The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) submits these comments in response to the Request for Information (RFI) issued by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) on October 24, 2024, in docket number ATR 103. The RFI seeks information on the “state of competition” in the air transportation industry. PPI’s comments address specific questions in the RFI that relate to markets for passenger air service (“passenger service”). In these markets, U.S. consumers and working families are directly affected by strategic business practices and consolidation, such as mergers, acquisitions, and joint venture agreements. Changes in competitive dynamics affect airfares and ancillary fees (“fees”), quality and innovation in technology and service, business models, and the reliability and stability of the air transportation supply chain.

PPI’s comments stress that competition in passenger service markets should be a priority for reframing competition policy in air transportation. Comments on the RFI from other organizations will focus on other parts of the air transportation supply chain, such as aircraft manufacturing, distribution of fare and schedule information, and labor markets. We encourage the agencies to consider how competition concerns in other markets can potentially create market power “bottlenecks.” Shocks to these bottleneck markets can cause cascading failures that affect the entire air transportation supply chain, including passenger air service. Recent examples include the Boeing 737 Max safety incidents and their impact on aircraft supply shortages and the flying public.

PPI’s comments begin with an assessment of inter-agency coordination on airline consolidation. This section is responsive to Section 10 in the RFI. The comments then turn to consolidation in domestic markets and access by smaller ultra low-cost (ULCC) and regional carriers to essential inputs such as takeoff and landing slots and airport facilities such as gates. This section is responsive to Section 3 in the RFI. The final section addresses changes in passenger service markets that affect DOT’s grants of antitrust immunity (ATI) for joint-venture agreements in the three major international alliances. This section is responsive to Section 2 in the RFI.

Read the comment response to the Request for Information issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of Transportation.

Related Work

Op-Ed  |  August 11, 2025

Moss for ProMarket: Weaponizing Antitrust and Regulation Will Hurt US Consumers

  • Diana Moss
Op-Ed  |  August 7, 2025

Moss for Jacksonville Journal-Courier: Antitrust Immunity for the NCAA? That’s a Foul

  • Diana Moss
Feature  |  July 31, 2025

The Future of Antitrust Conference and Contributions by the Panelists

  • Diana Moss
Publication  |  July 31, 2025

A Defense of the ‘For Cause’ Termination Provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act

  • Andrew Gavil William E. Kovacic
Publication  |  July 31, 2025

Invigorating Antitrust Without Stifling Economic Progress

  • Erik Hovenkamp
Feature  |  July 31, 2025

What is the Future of Antitrust? Reflections on PPI’s 2025 Antitrust Conference

  • Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley
  • Never miss an update:

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
PPI Logo
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Donate
  • Careers
  • © 2025 Progressive Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved.
  • |
  • Privacy Policy
  • |
  • Privacy Settings