PPI - Radically Pragmatic
  • Donate
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Careers
  • People
  • Projects
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Donate

Our Work

PPI’s Hal Singer Joins FCC Open Internet Roundtable; Argues For Case-by-Case Adjudication

  • October 2, 2014
  • The Progressive Policy Institute

WASHINGTON—Progressive Policy Institute Senior Fellow and Economist Hal Singer today served as a panelist for an Open Internet roundtable discussion hosted by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The roundtable, titled “Economics of Broadband: Market Successes and Market Failures,” first considered incentives to provide high quality open Internet access service and the relevance of market power. It then turned to policies to address market power, consumer protection, and shared benefits of the Internet.

Singer has long called for the FCC to eschew the heavy-handed approach of Title II regulation, and lean instead on its Section 706 authority to regulate potential abuses by ISPs on a case-by-case basis. Investment across both edge and content providers, he argues, will be greater compared to Title II, and the FCC can avoid any unintended consequences, such as creeping regulation, that encompasses content providers or other ISP services. Even an imperfect case-by-case approach to Internet discrimination is better and less costly than blanket prohibition, according to Singer.

“I would like to make five simple points in favor of a case-by-case approach to adjudicating discrimination complaints on the Internet,” Singer said in his remarks. “First, economists and engineers who have studied the issue of priority service unanimously believe that a market for priority could be a good thing for all parties to the transaction, including broadband customers. Second, not only do all parties to the priority transaction benefit, no third party is worse off with priority.

“Third, the leading proponent of strong net neutrality acknowledged in last week’s FCC Roundtable that priority could be a good thing so long as it is user-directed and users pick up the tab. Fourth, even if the FCC wanted to ban priority outright, there is no guarantee that Title II is up for the task. Fifth, the critiques of case-by-case should not persuade the Commission to embrace a blanket prohibition on priority.”

Download Singer’s prepared remarks.

# # #

Related Work

Op-Ed  |  October 14, 2025

Manno for Forbes: The AI Jobs Debate, Simplified: From Doom To Design

  • Bruno Manno
In the News  |  October 9, 2025

Ritz Talks Shutdown Solutions on SiriusXM POTUS: The Briefing

  • Ben Ritz
Press Release  |  September 18, 2025

Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and Microsoft Lead $403 Billion Surge in U.S. Investment, PPI Finds

  • Michael Mandel Andrew Fung
Op-Ed  |  September 18, 2025

Weinstein Jr. for Forbes: Fed Dot Plot Highlights Wide Disparity Of Views On Future Rate Cuts

  • Paul Weinstein Jr.
Publication  |  September 18, 2025

Investment Heroes 2025: The Shape of the AI-Enabled Economy

  • Michael Mandel Andrew Fung
Press Release  |  September 10, 2025

PPI Report Finds That Socioeconomic Impact of Legalized Sports Betting is Less Harmful Than Feared

  • Michael Mandel
  • Never miss an update:

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
PPI Logo
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Donate
  • Careers
  • © 2025 Progressive Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved.
  • |
  • Privacy Policy
  • |
  • Privacy Settings