PPI - Radically Pragmatic
  • Donate
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Careers
  • People
  • Projects
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Donate

Our Work

How Should We Think About Pro-Growth, Pro-Job Competition Policy?

  • July 29, 2017
  • Michael Mandel

We think of the United States as a low-inflation economy, with an overall price increase of 36% since 2000, or less than 2% a year.  But the fact is, the inflation  performance of different industries has varied greatly since 2000.  For example, the price of construction has gone up more than 100% since 2000, as measured by the BEA’s implicit value-added price index. The price of educational services has gone up by 80%, and the price of air travel has gone up by 76%.

By comparison, according to the BEA, the value-added price of broadcasting and telecom services has fallen by 22% since 2000, while the price of computer and electronic products has fallen by 62%.

The high-inflation industries tend to be on the physical side of the economy. As they get more expensive, they eat away at living standards. Think about it. Americans spend only 6% of their consumption dollars on tech/telecom goods and services, as measured by the BEA.  Other areas, such as housing, health, food, and transportation, are far more important for consumer spending.

That’s why we are suggesting a different way of prioritizing where we should focus our competition policy. Take a look at the 2×2 matrix below, where we categorize industries by whether they are high-inflation or low-inflation, and high-innovation or low-innovation.

 

Competition Policy Matrix

High innovation Low innovation
Rapid price increase

 

Air travel, construction, education
Slow price increase Tech/telecom

 

 

We suggest that progressive competition policy should focus on the upper right-hand quadrant–those industries where prices are increasing rapidly and innovation has been slow. There are two issues in these industries. First, has market power pushed up prices and held back innovation? Second, is government regulation helping support that market power?

Moreover, it also often turns out that high-innovation, low-inflation industries produce more jobs than low-innovation, high-inflation industries. Take a look at the table below, which just focuses on performance since 2007. The value added price index for air travel has risen almost 55% since 2007, according to the BEA. Meanwhile, prices for the tech/telecom sector has fallen more than 6%. And tech/telecom is clearly more innovative than air travel.

Over the same period, jobs have grown three times as fast in the tech/telecom sector as in air travel (including supporting services).

 

Comparing Performance
change since 2007
Air travel tech/telecom
Price change 54.5% -6.4%
jobs (thousands) 16.5 498.5
jobs (percent) 2.5% 7.6%

 

We suggesting that tackling market power in high-inflation, low-innovation industries could help boost growth, raise living standards, and create more jobs.

Related Work

Press Release  |  September 10, 2025

PPI Report Finds That Socioeconomic Impact of Legalized Sports Betting is Less Harmful Than Feared

  • Michael Mandel
Publication  |  September 10, 2025

Balancing Innovation and Risk: The Case of Legalized Sports Betting

  • Michael Mandel
Blog  |  September 5, 2025

Some Thoughts on Homeownership, Credit Scores, and Policy Myopia

  • Paul Weinstein Jr.
Op-Ed  |  August 22, 2025

Manno for Philanthropy Daily: A Donor Playbook for Local Workforce Renewal

  • Bruno Manno
In the News  |  August 15, 2025

Ritz on News Nation: 90th Anniversary of the Social Security Act

  • Ben Ritz
Press Release  |  August 11, 2025

Ahead of its 90th Birthday, PPI Offers Innovative Blueprint to Secure Social Security’s Future

  • Ben Ritz Nate Morris
  • Never miss an update:

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
PPI Logo
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Donate
  • Careers
  • © 2025 Progressive Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved.
  • |
  • Privacy Policy
  • |
  • Privacy Settings