PPI - Radically Pragmatic
  • Donate
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Careers
  • People
  • Projects
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Donate

Our Work

Unpacking the Biden Administration’s Merger Enforcement Record: A Look at the Stats and What They Mean

  • March 14, 2024
  • Diana Moss

Washington, D.C. — The Biden Administration has prioritized promoting competition in the U.S. economy. Antitrust enforcement is a major prong of this effort and merger control plays a central role. The Biden administration’s strategy is notable in that it differs from other pro-competition administrations. It features leadership sourced from the anti-monopoly movement that emphasizes concern with bigness, generating a robust debate over reconciling enforcement under the existing consumer welfare standard.

Today, the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) released a report titled, “Taking Stock of Merger Enforcement Under the Biden Administration.” PPI’s deep-dive analysis unpacks the Biden merger enforcement record based on data across three decades and five political administrations. Report author Diana Moss, Vice President and Director of Competition Policy, finds that the Biden enforcers are more aggressive based on some metrics of merger enforcement, but lag behind on others.

For example, PPI’s analysis reveals that the rates of merger abandonments/restructurings and preliminary injunctions are at an all-time high. The rate at which the Biden agencies win those injunctions in court, however, is below the historical average. Enforcement statistics also indicate that the Obama enforcers were more aggressive in invigorating enforcement than the Biden enforcers, in the wake of the Republican administrations they immediately succeeded.

“The Biden administration’s record shows important and potentially sustainable progress in invigorating enforcement. Leaning heavily on injunctions to accomplish this goal, however, creates a high bar and raises important issues,” said Diana Moss.

These issues include, among others, the risk that the Biden agencies’ below-average win rate on injunctions may create a legacy of case law that could slow progress in invigorating merger enforcement. Other issues include the risk of diverting needed attention away from improving policy on merger remedies and early-stage merger reviews.

In light of the PPI report findings, Moss concluded: “Now is a good time for the Biden administration to take stock of its current merger enforcement program to assess accomplishments, goals, agency leadership, and resources before a potential second term.”

Read and download the report here.

The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) is a catalyst for policy innovation and political reform based in Washington, D.C. Its mission is to create radically pragmatic ideas for moving America beyond ideological and partisan deadlock. Learn more about PPI by visiting progressivepolicy.org. Find an expert at PPI and follow us on Twitter.

###

Media Contact: Amelia Fox – afox@ppionline.org

Related Work

Op-Ed  |  August 11, 2025

Moss for ProMarket: Weaponizing Antitrust and Regulation Will Hurt US Consumers

  • Diana Moss
Op-Ed  |  August 7, 2025

Moss for Jacksonville Journal-Courier: Antitrust Immunity for the NCAA? That’s a Foul

  • Diana Moss
Feature  |  July 31, 2025

The Future of Antitrust Conference and Contributions by the Panelists

  • Diana Moss
Publication  |  July 31, 2025

A Defense of the ‘For Cause’ Termination Provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act

  • Andrew Gavil William E. Kovacic
Publication  |  July 31, 2025

Invigorating Antitrust Without Stifling Economic Progress

  • Erik Hovenkamp
Feature  |  July 31, 2025

What is the Future of Antitrust? Reflections on PPI’s 2025 Antitrust Conference

  • Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley
  • Never miss an update:

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
PPI Logo
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Donate
  • Careers
  • © 2025 Progressive Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved.
  • |
  • Privacy Policy
  • |
  • Privacy Settings