PPI - Radically Pragmatic
  • Donate
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Careers
  • People
  • Projects
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Donate

Our Work

Why Bill Gross is Wrong: Innovation and Long-term Returns on Equity

  • August 2, 2012
  • Michael Mandel

Editor’s Note: This item is cross-posted from Innovation and Growth. 

Bill Gross of Pimco has just written a piece where he argues that the real return on stocks in the future will be much lower than the long-term historical average of 6.6%:

Yet the 6.6% real return belied a commonsensical flaw much like that of a chain letter or yes – a Ponzi scheme. If wealth or real GDP was only being created at an annual rate of 3.5% over the same period of time, then somehow stockholders must be skimming 3% off the top each and every year. If an economy’s GDP could only provide 3.5% more goods and services per year, then how could one segment (stockholders) so consistently profit at the expense of the others (lenders, laborers and government)?

He then goes on to argue that:

The Siegel constant of 6.6% real appreciation, therefore, is an historical freak, a mutation likely never to be seen again as far as we mortals are concerned.

In a world of slow innovation, Gross is likely to be correct.  The economy grows slowly, and it becomes difficult to justify compensating risk capital if risks are not paying off.

The calculation changes, however, if we have big disruptive innovations. Big disruptive innovations offer risk on both the upside and the downside. On the upside, disruptive innovations create a wave of high-growth companies that drive the stock market higher. On the downside, disruptive innovations offer the distinct possibility of driving existing companies out of business, once again accentuating risk.

Innovation also makes diversification across a portfolio of large stocks a much less appealing prospect, since much of the stock gains will come from small companies that grow quickly. Investors therefore have to take more risk to capture the returns, whether they like it or not.

In this view of the world, an investment in the stock market becomes a bet on innovation. Do you think that the U.S. or the global economy has another wave of disruptive innovation coming? Then buy stocks. But if you think that we are stuck in permanent stagnation mode, then stay away from the stock market.

Related Work

Op-Ed  |  October 14, 2025

Manno for Forbes: The AI Jobs Debate, Simplified: From Doom To Design

  • Bruno Manno
In the News  |  October 9, 2025

Ritz Talks Shutdown Solutions on SiriusXM POTUS: The Briefing

  • Ben Ritz
Publication  |  September 18, 2025

Stablecoins Will Lessen Community Lending

  • Alex Kilander Paul Weinstein Jr.
Press Release  |  September 18, 2025

Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and Microsoft Lead $403 Billion Surge in U.S. Investment, PPI Finds

  • Michael Mandel Andrew Fung
Op-Ed  |  September 18, 2025

Weinstein Jr. for Forbes: Fed Dot Plot Highlights Wide Disparity Of Views On Future Rate Cuts

  • Paul Weinstein Jr.
Publication  |  September 18, 2025

Investment Heroes 2025: The Shape of the AI-Enabled Economy

  • Michael Mandel Andrew Fung
  • Never miss an update:

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
PPI Logo
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Donate
  • Careers
  • © 2025 Progressive Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved.
  • |
  • Privacy Policy
  • |
  • Privacy Settings