PPI - Radically Pragmatic
  • Donate
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Careers
  • People
  • Projects
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Donate

Our Work

Why we should say ‘yes’ to the data-driven economy

  • July 31, 2013
  • Michael Mandel

This is what progress looks like: Not easy, not pretty, but indispensable.

An article in the Wall Street Journal, Google’s Data-Trove Dance, graphically outlines the internal conflicts within Google about privacy versus more extensive of use of data. The article said.

under increased regulatory scrutiny in the U.S. and Europe, executives are engaged in wide-ranging internal debates and in some cases slowing product launches to address privacy concerns

The debates within Google mirror the debates in the broader society. On the one hand,  embracing the data-driven economy will increase quality of life, create jobs, and improve fiscal trade-offs.  On the other hand, the data-driven economy raises important privacy concerns that cannot be wished away.

What’s going on here? In the data-driven economy, data is an important new input to economic activity. In fact, just today the BEA  released an important new revision to GDP  which counts investment in ‘intangibles’.

The benefits of data are profound. Because people are  contributing their data about their location, you know which traffic-clogged roads to avoid, and which restaurants to patronize. Because people are contributing their data about jobs and skills, we have much more transparency about career paths and the job market, so potential workers can  learn what kind of education and training they need.   Because people are contributing their words and pictures, we’ve been able to build  communities that go beyond our immediate geographical borders.

Back in 2005, Benjamin Friedman of Harvard released a fascinating book entitled The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth. Friedman argued that “our conventional thinking about economic growth fails to reflect the breadth of what growth, or its absence, means for a society.”  Growth encourages social virtues such as fairness, tolerance, and mobility, while the absence of growth  undercuts social virtues such as democracy.

So the debate is not simply about privacy vs growth. We care about privacy, but we also care about the social benefits generated by growth. And that’s why I believe we should say ‘yes’ to the data-driven economy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related Work

Op-Ed  |  August 22, 2025

Manno for Philanthropy Daily: A Donor Playbook for Local Workforce Renewal

  • Bruno Manno
In the News  |  August 15, 2025

Ritz on News Nation: 90th Anniversary of the Social Security Act

  • Ben Ritz
Press Release  |  August 11, 2025

Ahead of its 90th Birthday, PPI Offers Innovative Blueprint to Secure Social Security’s Future

  • Ben Ritz Nate Morris
Publication  |  August 11, 2025

Reform That Rewards Work: A New Vision for Strengthening Social Security’s Intergenerational Compact

  • Ben Ritz Nate Morris
Op-Ed  |  August 3, 2025

Ritz for InsideSources: Work requirements increase bureaucracy more than accountability

  • Ben Ritz
Publication  |  July 30, 2025

Five More Problems With the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’

  • Alex Kilander
  • Never miss an update:

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
PPI Logo
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Donate
  • Careers
  • © 2025 Progressive Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved.
  • |
  • Privacy Policy
  • |
  • Privacy Settings