PPI - Radically Pragmatic
  • Donate
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Gallery
    • Careers
  • People
  • Projects
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Donate

Our Work

End of an Error: The Future of Trade Policy After the Midterms

  • November 11, 2026
  • Ed Gresser
Download PDF

Introduction

In the Biblical Book of Daniel, the mysterious writing on the wall conveys an ominous message to Babylon’s King Belshazzar:

“God has numbered the days of your kingdom and brought it to an end; you have been weighed in the balance and found wanting; your kingdom is divided and given to [others].”

The public’s message to Mr. Trump in last month’s election was just about as blunt — especially with respect to the trade wars he made his signature economic policy. Two years into the first U.S. general tariff increase since Herbert Hoover’s in 1930, American family budgets are stressed and workers’ real wages are down, farm and factory competitiveness have eroded, and America’s worldwide power and reputation are diminished. The “reindustrialization” and “new golden age” promised as compensation are nowhere in sight. Having weighed Mr. Trump’s policies in the balance and found them wanting, voters have given much of his power to others.

The new Congress taking office in January can respond to the voters’ central hope — a more affordable life for families, lower costs for farmers and manufacturers — by ending his tariff experiment and laying the foundation for something better under the next president.

Shutting down the tariff program would be relatively easy, at least in principle. Since Mr. Trump and his team imposed it through a mix of anti-Constitutional decrees at home and economic coercion abroad, rather than legitimate and durable law, their tariff wall is legally flimsy and their arrangements with foreign governments ephemeral. The incoming Congress, and the next president if necessary, can scrap it without regret. In so doing, they can remove some inflationary pressure on the U.S. economy and begin rebuilding relationships with America’s neighbors and allies.

The more difficult challenge is to find the right replacement. That is a longer-term project, entailing intellectual debate and consensus-building at home, skeptical reassessment of the past decade’s experiments in leftish “post-neoliberalism” and far-right “national conservatism,” and consultation with America’s friends abroad. But the new Congress can achieve a lot on its own, and lay a foundation for a better program emerging from the 2028 presidential campaign. It should rest on three pillars:

  • Repair the Constitutional damage and restore the separation of powers;
  • Ease the cost of living for families and cancel the cost premium on American industry.
  • Design an aspirational policy aiming at a better future, not reviving an idealized past.

Read the full report.

Related Work

Trade Fact  |  November 4, 2026

The Last President to Defend a General Tariff Increase: Herbert Hoover

  • Ed Gresser
Trade Fact  |  October 28, 2026

Freedom House — Count of ‘Electoral Democracies’ — Down From 125 in 2016 to 106

  • Ed Gresser
Trade Fact  |  October 21, 2026

Diesel Fuel Prices Unchanged Despite Administration Breach of Russia Sanctions

  • Ed Gresser
Trade Fact  |  October 14, 2026

Trump Administration Tariffs Are Not Achieving Their Goals

  • Ed Gresser
Trade Fact  |  October 7, 2026

U.S. Farm Income Down $9 Billion This Year; Expenses Up $5 billion

  • Ed Gresser
Trade Fact  |  September 30, 2026

Record Sea-Turtle Nesting Counts in Florida, Texas, and Georgia This Summer

  • Ed Gresser
  • Never miss an update:

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
PPI Logo
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Donate
  • Careers
  • © 2026 Progressive Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved.
  • |
  • Privacy Policy
  • |
  • Privacy Settings