PPI - Radically Pragmatic
  • Donate
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Careers
  • People
  • Projects
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Donate

Our Work

Langhorne for Forbes, “Separating Fact From Fiction: Five Important Findings About The Nation’s Charter School Landscape”

  • March 14, 2019
  • Emily Langhorne

Charter schools serve about three million students across 42 states and the District of Columbia. To clarify, charter schools are public schools operated by independent organizations, usually nonprofits. Most are schools of choice, and unlike magnet schools in traditional districts, they are not allowed to select their students. If too many students apply, they hold lotteries to see who gets in. Charter schools are freed from many of the rules that constrain district-operated schools. In exchange for increased autonomy, they are held accountable for their performance through contracts with authorizers.

Each state’s charter law empowers a variety of different agencies to authorize charters. The most common types of authorizers are a local school board, a state education agency, higher education institutions, and statewide bodies set up for the sole purpose of overseeing charter schools. Authorizers vet and approve charter school applications, and they also close or replace underperforming schools.

Based on both performance and sustainability, charter schools have been the most successful education improvement strategy of the millennium, and they’ve been particularly effective at educating low-income students. In places like New Orleans, Denver, and Washington, D.C., the charter formula – school-level autonomy, accountability, diversity of school design, and parental choice – has proven far more effective than the centralized, bureaucratic approach inherited from the 20thcentury.

However, over the last few years, the growth of charter schools across the nation has slowed. In an effort to understand this decline in growth, the National Association of Charter School Authorizers (NACSA) examined charter school proposals and approvals over the last five years, analyzing 3,000 charter school applications to authorizers in the 20 states that oversee nearly two-thirds of charters nationwide. Their new report Reinvigorating the Pipeline: Insights into Proposed and Approved Charter Schools unearths important facts about the nation’s charter school pipeline, facts that also dispel some of the commonly perpetuated myths about charter schools.

Continue reading at Forbes.

Related Work

Op-Ed  |  March 3, 2026

Manno for RealClearEducation: Developmental Education: From Catch-Up to Speed-Ahead

In the News  |  February 26, 2026

Kahlenberg in The Boston Globe: Ending college affirmative action didn’t devastate minority enrollment but only shifted it

  • Richard D. Kahlenberg
In the News  |  February 25, 2026

Osborne in Washington Monthly: Could New Orleans Be the Model for Fixing Public Schools?

  • David Osborne
Op-Ed  |  February 3, 2026

Manno for Real Clear Education: The College Accreditation Makeover

  • Bruno Manno
In the News  |  January 29, 2026

Canter in The St. Louis American: Missouri test scores expose achievement gap

  • Rachel Canter
Op-Ed  |  January 28, 2026

Manno for The 74: Dual Enrollment Is a School Choice Option People Don’t Talk About — but Should

  • Bruno Manno
  • Never miss an update:

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
PPI Logo
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Donate
  • Careers
  • © 2026 Progressive Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved.
  • |
  • Privacy Policy
  • |
  • Privacy Settings