PPI - Radically Pragmatic
  • Donate
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Gallery
    • Careers
  • People
  • Projects
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Donate

Our Work

Polls: National Security at Stake in Afghanistan

  • October 2, 2009
  • Jim Arkedis

It’s no secret that Democrats are uneasy with sending more troops to Afghanistan.

But here’s something I found rather interesting – with or without troops, all Americans – Dems included – understand why we’re there, and their preference is to keep the country safe from another terrorist attack.

Here are some numbers:

A late September USAToday/Gallup poll says 50 percent of all Americans oppose sending more troops to Afghanistan (a number supported by just about every other poll), the figure is even higher amongst Democrats—62 percent.

But more importantly, all Americans place a premium on securing the country. Though not a majority, more Americans (47 percent) believe we are doing “the right thing” in Afghanistan than those (42 percent) who believe we shouldn’t be involved, according a late September New York Times/CBSNews poll.

Furthermore, 76 percent (including 76 percent of Democrats), according to a Pew Research Center poll, believe that if the Taliban took over Afghanistan again, it would constitute a “major threat” to American security. This is an important point for progressives, who should acknowledge that the Taliban made itself America’s sworn enemy when it gave shelter to al Qaeda in the first place, over the repeated protests and ineffectual warnings of the Clinton administration.

Finally, President Obama’s goals are sinking in with the country: a combined 72 percent, according to New York Times/CBSNews, believe the goal in Afghanistan is to defeat the Taliban and/or eliminate terrorism.

Americans may not like the strategy, but they know we’re in Afghanistan to keep America safe. Democrats should support the goal, not the strategy.

Related Work

Blog  |  September 9, 2026

Steitz for Radically Pragmatic: Republicans Are Running From Trump’s Foreign Policy Record

  • Danielle Steitz
In the News  |  September 6, 2026

Jacoby on Background Briefing with Ian Masters: Russia’s Strike on Ukraine’s Intel HQ and the Shootout Between Rival Ukrainian Intel Agents

  • Tamar Jacoby
Op-Ed  |  September 2, 2026

Jacoby for Washington Monthly: The New Normal in Kyiv, Ukraine

  • Tamar Jacoby
Press Release  |  August 25, 2026

PPI: Yes to Stronger Sanctions on Russia and Support for Ukraine; No to Giving the Trump Administration New Tariff Authority

  • Tamar Jacoby Ed Gresser Danielle Steitz
In the News  |  August 24, 2026

Jacoby in CEPA: Ukraine’s Defense Industry: The Motor of Post-War Revival

  • Tamar Jacoby
Op-Ed  |  August 24, 2026

Jacoby for Washington Monthly: Beyond Virtue Signaling on Ukraine and Russia

  • Tamar Jacoby
  • Never miss an update:

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
PPI Logo
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Donate
  • Careers
  • © 2026 Progressive Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved.
  • |
  • Privacy Policy
  • |
  • Privacy Settings