PPI - Radically Pragmatic
  • Donate
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Gallery
    • Careers
  • People
  • Projects
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Donate

Our Work

Creating Measurement and Accountability Systems for 21st Century Schools: A Guide for State Policymakers

  • October 19, 2016
  • David Osborne
Download PDF

Because Congress passed the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) last December, states are revamping their federally required systems to measure school quality and hold schools accountable for performance. But most are doing so using outdated assumptions, holdovers from the Industrial Era, when cookiecutter public schools followed orders from central headquarters and students were assigned to the closest school. Today we are migrating toward systems of diverse, fairly autonomous schools of choice, some of them operated by independent organizations. Before revising their measurement and accountability systems, states need to rethink their assumptions.

For instance, most states have assumed that they should apply one standardized, statewide accountability system to almost all public schools. Most have also assumed that measurement and accountability systems are roughly the same thing, so the only aspects of performance they need to measure are those in their federally-required accountability systems. Under the old No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, most of those measures were standardized test scores, and what counted was the percentage of students scoring “proficient” or better. When schools repeatedly failed to meet such standards, most states assumed the proper response was someminor form of restructuring required by NCLB—perhaps a new principal, perhaps some new teachers, perhaps some new money.

None of these assumptions will produce the schools our children need in the 21st century. NCLB was an important step in its time, institutionalizing an expectation that states would hold schools accountable for the learning of all their children, including the poor, minorities, and those with special needs. But it relied on the fairly blunt tools used by most states back in 2001: primarily achievement scores on standardized math and reading tests. In the intervening 15 years, more tools
have become available—and even more are the subject of intense research today. Fortunately, the ESSA has opened the door to these new approaches.

 


 

Related Work

Op-Ed  |  August 4, 2026

Manno for Datia K12: Texas Shows What Coherent College and Career Advising Looks Like

  • Bruno Manno
Op-Ed  |  July 29, 2026

Manno for Washington Monthly: The Quiet Redesign of the Bachelor’s Degree

  • Bruno Manno
Op-Ed  |  July 28, 2026

Kahlenberg and Lin for the Radically Pragmatic Substack: What’s Wrong with American Studies?

  • Richard D. Kahlenberg Lief Lin
Op-Ed  |  July 27, 2026

Manno for Datia K12:The Nuance in the Social Media Debate That K-12 Leaders Can’t Afford to Miss

  • Bruno Manno
Op-Ed  |  July 24, 2026

Canter and Manno for Thomas Fordham Institute: Good programs aren’t enough: States need a work-based learning strategy

  • Rachel Canter Bruno Manno
Blog  |  July 23, 2026

Canter on Radically Pragmatic Substack: How Mississippi Almost Abandoned Its Education Reforms

  • Rachel Canter
  • Never miss an update:

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
PPI Logo
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Donate
  • Careers
  • © 2026 Progressive Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved.
  • |
  • Privacy Policy
  • |
  • Privacy Settings