PPI - Radically Pragmatic
  • Donate
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Careers
  • People
  • Projects
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Donate

Our Work

Why we should say ‘yes’ to the data-driven economy

  • July 31, 2013
  • Michael Mandel

This is what progress looks like: Not easy, not pretty, but indispensable.

An article in the Wall Street Journal, Google’s Data-Trove Dance, graphically outlines the internal conflicts within Google about privacy versus more extensive of use of data. The article said.

under increased regulatory scrutiny in the U.S. and Europe, executives are engaged in wide-ranging internal debates and in some cases slowing product launches to address privacy concerns

The debates within Google mirror the debates in the broader society. On the one hand,  embracing the data-driven economy will increase quality of life, create jobs, and improve fiscal trade-offs.  On the other hand, the data-driven economy raises important privacy concerns that cannot be wished away.

What’s going on here? In the data-driven economy, data is an important new input to economic activity. In fact, just today the BEA  released an important new revision to GDP  which counts investment in ‘intangibles’.

The benefits of data are profound. Because people are  contributing their data about their location, you know which traffic-clogged roads to avoid, and which restaurants to patronize. Because people are contributing their data about jobs and skills, we have much more transparency about career paths and the job market, so potential workers can  learn what kind of education and training they need.   Because people are contributing their words and pictures, we’ve been able to build  communities that go beyond our immediate geographical borders.

Back in 2005, Benjamin Friedman of Harvard released a fascinating book entitled The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth. Friedman argued that “our conventional thinking about economic growth fails to reflect the breadth of what growth, or its absence, means for a society.”  Growth encourages social virtues such as fairness, tolerance, and mobility, while the absence of growth  undercuts social virtues such as democracy.

So the debate is not simply about privacy vs growth. We care about privacy, but we also care about the social benefits generated by growth. And that’s why I believe we should say ‘yes’ to the data-driven economy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related Work

Publication  |  May 12, 2025

Cutting Credit: How Rate Caps Undermine Access for Working Americans

  • Alex Kilander Andrew Fung Sophia Lu
Publication  |  May 5, 2025

How Trump’s BBB is Shaping Up to Be an Even Bigger Mess Than Biden’s

  • Ben Ritz
Budget Breakdown  |  April 4, 2025

Trump’s “Liberation Day” Comes at Great Cost to Taxpayers

  • Ben Ritz Alex Kilander
Blog  |  April 4, 2025

The AI Investment Surge and Manufacturing

  • Michael Mandel
Budget Breakdown  |  February 27, 2025

IRS Layoffs Threaten to Inject Chaos Into Tax Filing Season and Cost Taxpayers Billions

  • Ben Ritz Alex Kilander
Blog  |  February 26, 2025

Child Opportunity Accounts Would Expand Opportunity and Financial Capability for American Children

  • Alex Kilander
  • Never miss an update:

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
PPI Logo
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Donate
  • Careers
  • © 2025 Progressive Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved.
  • |
  • Privacy Policy
  • |
  • Privacy Settings