PPI - Radically Pragmatic
  • Donate
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Careers
  • People
  • Projects
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Donate

Our Work

Why we should say ‘yes’ to the data-driven economy

  • July 31, 2013
  • Michael Mandel

This is what progress looks like: Not easy, not pretty, but indispensable.

An article in the Wall Street Journal, Google’s Data-Trove Dance, graphically outlines the internal conflicts within Google about privacy versus more extensive of use of data. The article said.

under increased regulatory scrutiny in the U.S. and Europe, executives are engaged in wide-ranging internal debates and in some cases slowing product launches to address privacy concerns

The debates within Google mirror the debates in the broader society. On the one hand,  embracing the data-driven economy will increase quality of life, create jobs, and improve fiscal trade-offs.  On the other hand, the data-driven economy raises important privacy concerns that cannot be wished away.

What’s going on here? In the data-driven economy, data is an important new input to economic activity. In fact, just today the BEA  released an important new revision to GDP  which counts investment in ‘intangibles’.

The benefits of data are profound. Because people are  contributing their data about their location, you know which traffic-clogged roads to avoid, and which restaurants to patronize. Because people are contributing their data about jobs and skills, we have much more transparency about career paths and the job market, so potential workers can  learn what kind of education and training they need.   Because people are contributing their words and pictures, we’ve been able to build  communities that go beyond our immediate geographical borders.

Back in 2005, Benjamin Friedman of Harvard released a fascinating book entitled The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth. Friedman argued that “our conventional thinking about economic growth fails to reflect the breadth of what growth, or its absence, means for a society.”  Growth encourages social virtues such as fairness, tolerance, and mobility, while the absence of growth  undercuts social virtues such as democracy.

So the debate is not simply about privacy vs growth. We care about privacy, but we also care about the social benefits generated by growth. And that’s why I believe we should say ‘yes’ to the data-driven economy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related Work

Press Release  |  June 25, 2026

New PPI Report Warns Delivery Regulations Could Disrupt Markets That Benefit Millions

  • Michael Mandel Andrew Fung
Publication  |  June 25, 2026

A Tale Of A Three-Sided Market: Understanding Online Food Delivery Services

  • Michael Mandel Andrew Fung
Press Release  |  May 19, 2026

New PPI Report Shows Algorithmic Pricing as Path to Variety, Affordability, and Less Waste

  • Michael Mandel
Publication  |  May 19, 2026

Algorithmic Pricing, Increased Variety, and Less Waste: The Much-Awaited End to the One-Size-Fits-All Economy

  • Michael Mandel
Press Release  |  April 16, 2026

Governors and Mayors Must Step Up to Counter China’s Local Tech Investment Surge, New PPI Report Warns

  • Michael Mandel
Op-Ed  |  January 16, 2026

Weinstein Jr. for Real Clear Markets: Stablecoin Rewards and Their Quiet Threat to Community Banking

  • Paul Weinstein Jr.
  • Never miss an update:

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
PPI Logo
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Donate
  • Careers
  • © 2026 Progressive Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved.
  • |
  • Privacy Policy
  • |
  • Privacy Settings