PPI - Radically Pragmatic
  • Donate
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Careers
  • People
  • Projects
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Donate

Our Work

Ritz for Forbes: Win or Lose, Executive Actions Like Student Debt Cancellation Should Face Judicial Review

  • February 27, 2023
  • Ben Ritz

By Ben RItz

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments this week on the constitutionality of President Biden’s attempt to cancel up to $20,000 in student loans per borrower via executive action last year. Many proponents of the move, including the Biden administration itself, have argued that not only is the move itself legal but that it is wrong for the courts to even entertain the pending challenges to its legitimacy. Whether one thinks the plan itself is lawful or not, everyone should be grateful that the courts are so far rejecting this argument and taking a serious look at the merits of the plan itself because failure to do so could have catastrophic long-term implications.

The Biden administration says that it has the authority to grant mass debt cancellation under the HEROES Act: a law passed in 2003 that gives the Secretary of Education authority to adjust the terms of any loan it holds during national emergencies. The law was introduced to make it easier to discharge debt for victims of terrorism and veterans who were injured or killed fighting the War on Terror, but the Biden administration argues that the law’s text gives them broad discretion to provide relief for anyone who lived through the COVID-19 pandemic.

Several lawsuits claimed this broad interpretation was an abuse of the HEROES Act authority that went well beyond Congress’s intent in passing the law. The answer to this legal question has serious implications for our constitutional system, which entrusts Congress with the power of the purse. If allowed to proceed, Biden’s debt cancellation move would cost taxpayers over $400 billion. That would be one of the biggest expenditures of public funds without explicit Congressional appropriation.

Read more in Forbes.

Related Work

In the News  |  June 11, 2026

Ritz in The New York Times: Liberals Must Oppose Nationalizing AI

  • Ben Ritz
Op-Ed  |  June 11, 2026

Ritz for Forbes: Trump Is Leaving His Successor A Social Security Time Bomb

  • Ben Ritz
Press Release  |  June 9, 2026

PPI: Next President Must Save Social Security After Trump Policies Accelerated Insolvency

  • Ben Ritz
In the News  |  May 12, 2026

Ritz in Real Clear Politics: “Get Real” With RCP’s David Desrosiers: Voting Rights Act, New Affordability Agenda & Tax the Rich

  • Ben Ritz
Podcast  |  April 23, 2026

Ritz on Concord Coalition’s Facing the Future Podcast: Are Democrats Backing ‘Slopulist’ Tax Cuts?

  • Ben Ritz
In the News  |  March 28, 2026

Ritz on The New Liberal Podcast: Do Democrats have a ‘Slopulism’ problem?

  • Ben Ritz
  • Never miss an update:

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
PPI Logo
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Donate
  • Careers
  • © 2026 Progressive Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved.
  • |
  • Privacy Policy
  • |
  • Privacy Settings