After several months of gridlock, lawmakers offered two competing frameworks yesterday for giving the American people another round of much-needed economic relief from the covid pandemic. The first is a $908 billion compromise with support from 16 members of both parties in the U.S. House and Senate, while the second is a $553 billion partisan proposal from Senate Majority Mitch McConnell. McConnell has called his plan a “targeted relief package,” but this framing is deceptive: policymakers should not conflate penny-pinching with proper targeting. Amidst the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, the appropriate response is guaranteed to be expensive even if it is well-targeted.
Our country is entering the most dangerous phase of the pandemic yet. As we head into the winter, the number of new covid cases in the United States is at the highest level it’s been since the pandemic began. Consumer spending growth is slowing right as we enter the holiday season, imposing a further drag on the economy. Although there had been strong job growth in the first few months of recovery, the number of people applying for unemployment benefits each week is starting to rise again after having never fallen below 700,000 since the pandemic began. Four months after most relief programs from the CARES Act expired, and less than one month before millions of people get kicked off of life-saving unemployment benefits, it’s urgent for the federal government to step in and provide fiscal support.
Republicans were somewhat justified in their concerns that the $3 trillion HEROES Act, which House Democrats introduced in May, was poorly-targeted. But the same cannot be said of yesterday’s compromise framework. For example, whereas the HEROES Act would have increased weekly unemployment benefits by $600/week, allowing many laid-off workers to receive more in benefits than they lost in wages, the compromise framework would only increase them by $300/week – a level many Republicans, including President Trump, have supported in the past. The HEROES Act would have given almost $1 trillion in aid to state and local governments, which is several times more than the budget shortfalls created by the pandemic. But the compromise framework offers $250 billion, a figure that is closer to their estimated needs for the current fiscal year and will help prevent the deep cuts to essential services. The coalition of leaders who put together this proposal, including Sens. Joe Manchin, Mark Warner, and Susan Collins, deserve praise for working to find a commonsense approach to break the fiscal impasse.
Read the rest of the piece here.