A Banner Year at the Progressive Policy Institute

Dear Friends,
I look back on 2019 with mixed feelings. It’s been another terrific year for the Progressive Policy Institute. But it hasn’t been a great year for our country.
Thanks to Rep. Adam Schiff, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Democrats, the public knows exactly how President Trump misused the power of his office to pursue his personal and political interests. For this and his blatant obstruction of justice, Trump richly deserves to be impeached.
He likely won’t be convicted, however, because most Republican Senators apparently lack the integrity and courage to put country over party and uphold the Constitution. So U.S. voters will have to fire Trump to get our democracy back on track.
Democrats’ responsibility is to give voters an acceptable alternative. As a think tank, PPI can’t endorse candidates, but we can influence the national political debate. Over the past year we’ve done just that.
For example, PPI organized issues forums in Iowa earlier this year featuring former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, who led a discussion of progressive alternatives to single payer or “Medicare for all,” and Rep. Tim Ryan of Ohio, who joined Iowa leaders in making the case for a major infrastructure push to stimulate job and business creation in parts of the country that have been left out of today’s prosperity.
In September, PPI rolled out our alternative to Sen. Bernie Sanders’ massively expensive and disruptive Medicare for All plan: Affordable Health Care for All: An American Solution to High Costs and Coverage Gaps. Written by PPI health policy director Arielle Kane, the report instead proposes an innovative “price cap” and other reforms that would reduce medical costs without depriving 150 million Americans of private health insurance.
Throughout the year, Team PPI also kept up a steady output of op-eds in major newspapers, articles, posts and media mentions. And thanks to digital communications director Carter Christensen, our online communications footprint is bigger than ever.

Here are some other highlights from the year:

  • In a series of groundbreaking reports and articles, PPI chief economic strategist Michael Mandel documented the enormous contribution digital innovation is making to U.S. job growth and competitiveness, including the emergence of “manufacturing platforms” – companies that rewrite the rules of production and product development, and in the process create new opportunities for local manufacturing.
  • PPI’s Reinventing America’s Schools project, led by David Osborne, Curtis Valentine and Tressa Pankovits, helped education leaders and parents’ groups in many cities learn from “best practice” K-12 reforms in New Orleans, Washington, D.C., Denver and Indianapolis. PPI also pushed back against a campaign by teachers’ unions to demonize public charter schools, reminded Democrats that their party had led the development of charters, and criticized Sens. Sanders and Elizabeth Warren for parroting union demands to deprive minority parents of the ability to choose better schools for their kids.
  • In July, PPI released a comprehensive budget proposal: Funding America’s Future: A Progressive Budget for Equitable Growth. Written by Ben Ritz and Brendan McDermott, the 96-page blueprint details a fiscally responsible way to cut the national debt while supercharging critical public investments in innovation and growth, modernizing federal health and retirement programs and reforming taxes to reward work over wealth.
  • On the trade front, PPI highlighted the destructive impact of President Trump’s capricious tariffs, while also making the case for why progressives should “get to yes” on the NAFTA update. This included conversations between New Democrats and Blue Dogs with Ambassadors of America’s chief trading partners.
  • On the increasingly important issue of climate change, Strategic Adviser Paul Bledsoe skewered both GOP science denial and Green New Deal fantasies of a top-down reordering of the U.S. economy. He advocated instead for practical clean energy policies, such as making sure America wins the global race to electric cars.
  • Our Center for Civil Justice, led by attorney Phil Goldberg, hosted a California forum on how local and state governments can do their part to combat climate change without resorting to litigation scapegoating energy companies.
  • PPI kept up its robust international engagement in Europe, Asia and Latin America. In addition to multiple trips to Brussels and other European capitals, PPI made its first foray into India, and also met with key political and business leaders in Japan, Vietnam, Australia and Canada.
2019 was another year of expansion. Additions to our team include Neel Brown (political outreach), Dane Stangler (entrepreneurship, metro innovation and immigration); and Jason Gold (leading a new project on “Free Enterprise for All.”).
None of this would be possible without the counsel, friendship, and financial support of friends like you. Together, we are strengthening America’s pragmatic center against extremism on both ends of the political spectrum. Please let us hear from you in 2020 as we work to make democracy in America great again.
With gratitude,
Will Marshall

Bledsoe for the New York Times: “Our Future Depends on the Arctic”

Delegates from nearly every nation spent the last two weeks here at a United Nations climate summit struggling to chart a course to meet the extraordinarily difficult goal of net zero emissions of carbon dioxide by the year 2050.

Yet long before then, the effects of global warming could spin out of control. As the United Nations’ secretary general, António Guterres, warned in opening the meeting: “The point of no return is no longer over the horizon. It is in sight and hurtling toward us.”

Perhaps nowhere is that more true than in the Arctic. The surface air there is warming at twice the global rate and temperatures over the past five years have exceeded all previous records since 1900. This past week, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reported that the extent of Arctic summer sea ice was at its second lowest point since satellite observations began in 1979, and that average temperatures for the year ending in September were the second highest since 1900, when record-keeping began.

Read the full piece here.

Ritz for Forbes: “Three Tax Cuts a Santa Claus Congress Could Deliver in 2019”

Congress must pass a comprehensive funding bill by the end of next week to avoid a repeat of last year’s government shutdown. Such a must-pass bill at the end of the year often becomes a “Christmas tree” decorated with various policy riders and pet projects for members of both parties in Congress. But under this year’s tree, a fiscally irresponsible Santa Claus Congress might leave wealthy Americans three gifts that together could cost up to $1 trillion over the next ten years – all put on the nation’s credit card for young Americans to pay off for generations to come.

Read the full piece here.

Marshall for The Hill: “Is Corbyn handing Brexit to Boris Johnson?”

When British voters go to the polls Thursday, it probably will be their last chance to stop Brexit. If they don’t, Jeremy Corbyn will bear much of the blame.

Wait – isn’t the Labour Party leader running to oust the man actually driving the UK toward Brexit, Prime Minister Boris Johnson? Yes, but polls show Johnson’s Conservatives holding on to a double-digit lead over Labour. That’s remarkable, considering the sorry mess Tory leaders have made of Brexit over the last three years.

If Johnson has the electoral wind at his back, it’s not because he’s so mesmerizing. It’s mainly because of Corbyn’s epic unpopularity with UK voters. A mere 22 percent approve of Labour’s chief, while 58 percent say he’s doing badly. Thirty-six percent approve of Johnson, and 43 percent rate him negatively.

Read Will Marshall’s full op-ed here.

Pankovits and Osborne for The Washington Post: “Poor children are still left behind in DCPS schools”

D.C. Public Schools received well-deserved praise for its recent scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), a.k.a. “The Nation’s Report Card.” Of the 27 urban districts that took the test in 2019, DCPS improved the fastest, continuing a trend that stretches back more than a decade.

In 2003, when only a handful of urban districts participated, DCPS fourth-graders trailed the other cities by 28 points in reading and 29 in math. (Because 10 points is considered a year’s learning, this was an enormous gap.) In 2019, the gap was down to 5 points in both subjects. DCPS should be proud.

Sadly, however, one group has been left out of this good news: low-income children. In 2019, DCPS eighth-graders eligible for free or reduced-price lunch (FRL) scored 25th out of 27 urban districts in reading, 21st out of 27 in math.

The gap between these children and others in DCPS was 49 points in reading — almost five grade levels. In math it was even worse, 53 points.

Though low-income fourth-graders did a little better, they still had a 51-point gap in reading and a 41-point gap in math.

The bottom line: DCPS has improved by leaps and bounds, but it has not figured out how to educate its poorest students. In contrast, many of the city’s charter schools have figured that out. The 2019 NAEP score gap between D.C.’s FRL-eligible charter students and other charter students in eighth grade was 12 points; in fourth grade it averaged just 10 points.

Read the full op-ed here.

Press Release: “PPI, German Partners To Explore Metro Innovation and Governance”

Across the United States and Europe, metropolitan regions have emerged as hubs of public innovation and collaborative problem-solving. A new model for progressive governance is emerging from some of our most dynamic cities, large and small. 

To draw transatlantic policymakers’ attention to this promising development, the Progressive Policy Institute has joined forces with Das Progressive Zentrum and Alfred Herrhausen Gessellschaft in Germany to launch “New Urban Progress.” This three-year project will study and compare notes on metro innovations in three German cities and three U.S. cities, with the aim of sparking a crossfertilization of ideas for encouraging local initiative and ground-up problem-solving. 

“At PPI, we have called for a renewed flexible federalism that will empower more localized innovation. It’s happening around the country—but local innovators need more support,” said PPI’s Director of Policy Innovation Dane Stangler. 

“Today’s urban ferment yields instructive insights for local and national policymakers in the United States and Europe,” said PPI President Will Marshall. “This transatlantic initiative will focus on empowering metros to tackle urgent national challenges — inclusive growth, new infrastructure, social mobility, climate change — from the ground up.”

Support for the New Urban Progress initiative comes from the Transatlantic Program of the Federal Republic of Germany, and funding from the European Recovery Program (ERP) of the Federal Ministry of Economics and Energy (BMWi) along with other key policy leaders. 

The cities chosen for this initiative will be announced in the coming months, including project fellows who will come from county and municipal government, business, the nonprofit sector, and more. 

###

Blog post from our partner, Das Progressive Zentrum, on today’s announcement: https://www.progressives-zentrum.org/rejuvenating-transatlantic-dialog-from-the-bottom-up/?lang=en

Contact: media@ppionline.org or 202-525-3931

Stangler for Medium: “Announcing the New Urban Progress Initiative to Foster Metro Problem-Solving”

In its recently published The World in 2020, the editors of The Economist observe that the U.S. presidential race will “hog headlines” globally for the next year. One of the implications of this is that citizens everywhere — not just in America — will be inundated with debate and disagreement over large-scale national issues and policies. Immigration, Medicare-for-all, trade, climate change, and so on.

This is understandable of course: the president is elected by the whole country and will concern himself or herself with matters that are national in scope.

Yet many of the challenges that Americans and their communities struggle to address can best be solved locally. In many cases, they can only be solved locally. Take climate change, for example. On one hand, it doesn’t get any more national and transnational than this. On the other, national solutions, at least in the United States, are not in the offing anytime soon. States, cities, counties, and regions are best placed to adapt to climate change — even Republicans agree.

Read the full announcement.

Ritz for Forbes: “In Warren and Harris Falls, A Warning To Candidates About Overpromising”

The Warren bubble has burst. Two months ago, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren was rocketing to the top of the presidential polls, at one point tying former Vice President Joe Biden for first place nationally and leading in both Iowa and New Hampshire. But she’s been in freefall for several weeks following the release of a controversial plan for financing Medicare for All, the single-payer health-care system championed by Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Where did it all go wrong? Some argue that Warren’s big mistake was in publishing any plan to pay for MFA at all. The reality, however, is that Warren isn’t falling because she planned too much, but rather because she didn’t plan carefully enough.

Read the full piece here.

Lewis for The Gazette: “Finding Common Ground on Net Neutrality”

Even before impeachment gained momentum, Americans overwhelmingly agreed that our country is “on the wrong track” and disapproved of the performance of the president and Congress. That’s largely because, even on issues where there is broad public agreement, the legislative and executive branches have been unable to find sensible solutions.

Exhibit A is an issue that should be about technology, not ideology: broadband policy. Over two decades, most Americans have come to agree about the basic principle of “net neutrality.” That’s the common-sense idea that all internet traffic must be treated equally, and no company should be able to block or throttle online traffic in order to gain a competitive leg-up.

But still, some progressives insist on all-or-nothing over-regulation of the internet, while some conservatives contend that the best thing the federal government can do is nothing at all. Recent events make it even more urgent for the grownups to break the gridlock.

Read the full op-ed here.

PPI Metro Playbook – Columbia, SC

Over the final three decades of the 20th century, one of the defining features of American life was the abandonment and deterioration of historic urban centers. In cities large and small, from coast to coast, residents and dollars followed the interstate highways out of the old commercial downtowns and out to the suburbs.

Columbia, S.C., may be an exceptional town in some respects – it is, after all, both a state capital and the home of the University of South Carolina – but even these enviable assets could not save it from the centrifugal forces that were leeching the vitality of Downtown U.S.A. during the Seventies and Eighties. College kids and civil servants weren’t enough to prevent Macy’s and other department stores from either decamping for the ‘burbs or shuttering entirely. Our latest Metro Playbook:

 

Trump Trade Deficit Widens to New Record

Despite all his bluster, the “Trump Trade Deficit” widened to a new record in the third quarter of 2019.  The non-oil merchandise trade deficit hit $1.047 trillion in the third quarter of 2019, in 2012 dollars (annual rate). That’s according to PPI calculations based on new data released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis on November 27. The latest trade deficit beat the previous record set in the fourth quarter of 2018, also under Trump.

These widening trade deficits claw right at the heart of the middle of the country, where farmers and factory workers are suffering under Trump’s misguided policies.  Factory closings just keep coming: Sparta, Wisconsin; Atlanta, Ga; West Plains, Missouri. 

Trump’s trade failures give progressive presidential candidates an opportunity to run a pro-manufacturing,  pro-growth campaign.  They should be advocating policies that jumpstart a new generation of manufacturing entrepreneurs across the country. They should support local distributed manufacturing, which both creates jobs and helps the environment.  Most of all, progressives should come out squarely in favor of a Production Economy that supports America’s core values as a producer rather than a consumer.

 

 

 

 

PPI’s Ben Ritz Talks Social Security with Ric Edelman

The Director of PPI’s Center for Funding America’s Future, Ben Ritz, joined personal-finance advisor Ric Edelman on his nationally syndicated radio show to discuss the challenges facing Social Security, their role in the 2020 election, and PPI’s proposal to strengthen the program for future generations. Listen to the interview below and read our full plan here.

Kane for The Hill: “Presidential candidates should use their platforms to elevate oral health”

The debate over “Medicare for All” has sucked the oxygen from many other important health policy issues. Though 28 million Americans lack health insurance in the United States, there is an untold crisis of more than four times that population — 114 million Americans — without dental coverage.

Millions of Americans are suffering from decaying teeth, gum disease, and chronic pain. Yet, in the Democratic presidential debates thus far, barely a word has been spoken about this crisis. When we spend so much time talking about health care, why is oral health so easy to ignore?

Oral health affects overall health. The consequences of untreated decay and periodontal disease – slowly destructive gum infections – include increased risk of cancers, cardiovascular diseases, Alzheimer’s disease, and premature births. Yet, almost two-thirds of Medicare enrollees, a quarter of children, and 40 percent of adults under the age of 65 don’t have dental coverage.

Read the full op-ed here.

Osborne for Wall Street Journal: “The Big Lie About Charter Schools”

Democratic presidential candidates claim they take money away from public schools. That’s nonsense.

When Sen. Elizabeth Warren released her education plan, she trotted out a familiar charge against charter schools: that they “strain the resources of school districts.” To fight this supposed scourge, she promised to end federal financial support for new charter schools. And she’s not an outlier among the Democratic presidential hopefuls. Her fellow progressive Sen. Bernie Sanders had already charged, in his education plan, that charter schools’ “growth has drained funding from the public school system.”

Even Joe Biden —who served under President Obama, an enthusiastic charter supporter—has picked up the refrain. “The bottom line” on chartering, he told an American Federation of Teachers town hall, “is, it siphons off money for our public schools, which are already in enough trouble.”

To begin with, charters themselves are public schools. The only difference is that they are operated independently of district bureaucracies, with more freedom to design their programs and choose their teachers but also more accountability. If charters fail—if their students fall too far behind—they are usually closed.

Read the full op-ed here.

Bledsoe for The Hill: “Extend solar tax credits, but end costly Carter-era subsidies”

Federal solar power tax credits have been a huge American success story, creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and tens of billions of dollars a year in clean energy investment, while avoiding hundreds of millions of tons of greenhouse gas emissions. But despite its remarkable growth, solar energy still only provides about 1.5 percent of U.S. electricity. Solar must grow far larger to help the U.S. reduce carbon dioxide emissions, an action urgently needed for climate protection.

Under current law, the 30 percent solar investment tax credit begins to phase down next year, then disappears altogether for residential consumers in 2022 and phases down permanently to a 10 percent credit for commercial operations.

Read the full op-ed here.

Marshall for The Hill: “‘Old World’ demons are stirring again”

Distracted by the high drama of impeachment, Americans may not be following European political developments very closely. It’s time to tune in, though, because “Old World” demons are stirring again.

In Spain’s recent election, the anti-immigrant Vox party scored dramatic gains, more than doubling its seats in the national legislature. This caught everyone’s attention, because the tidal surge of illiberal nationalism rolling across other parts of Europe until now had bypassed Spain.

Just as Donald Trump dug up ideas long thought to have been dead and buried in this country – nativism, protectionism, “America First” isolationism – the rhetoric and political demands of Europe’s extreme right contain disturbing echoes of the virulent nationalism that swept the continent during the 1920s and 1930s and plunged the world into history’s bloodiest war.

Read the full op-ed here.