Manno for Washington Monthly: Why AI Could Be a Boon for Workers

A recent article in the New York Times seemed to signal an AI-fueled apocalypse for job seekers. The article profiled the plight of recent college graduates who’d expected six-figure jobs with their computer science degrees but were now scrapping for shifts at Chipotle. According to one expert quoted in the Times, the jobs “most likely to be automated are the entry-level positions that [recent graduates] would be seeking.”

Recent research shows that AI is replacing entry-level jobs, similar to how mechanical automation eliminated low-skill manufacturing roles in past decades. However, this expanding definition of “expertise” will eventually create new jobs and pathways for workers to gain skills necessary to stay competitive in a post-AI era. The outcome could be the democratization of expertise and wider opportunities for upward mobility.

Read more in Washington Monthly.

New Orleans’ 20-Year Transformation Offers National Lessons on School Reform

WASHINGTON — Two decades after Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans, a new report from the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) reveals how the city’s complete overhaul of its public education system yielded unprecedented academic gains, offering a blueprint to transform struggling school districts nationwide.

The report, “20 Years of Reinvention: Education Reform in New Orleans,” chronicles the city’s bold post-Katrina move to convert its traditional public schools into public charter schools. The move radically redefines the role of the district and shows student achievement surging across nearly every metric: test scores, graduation rates, college enrollment, and school accountability ratings.

“New Orleans proves that it is possible to build a public education system that is both excellent and equitable,” said Rachel Canter, Director of Education Policy at PPI and co-author of the report. “This transformation didn’t happen overnight; it required political courage, sustained leadership, and a relentless focus on student outcomes.”

Among the key findings:

  • The percentage of New Orleans students scoring at “basic or above” on fourth-grade English tests rose from 44% in 2005 to 54% in 2024, on more rigorous exams.
  • High school graduation rates climbed from 54% in 2004 to nearly 79% in 2023.
  • College entry rates jumped from 37% to 65%, now surpassing the state average.

The report attributes these gains to a powerful mix of school autonomy, strong accountability, citywide public school choice, and a robust ecosystem of nonprofit partners.

“New Orleans didn’t just rebuild its schools, it reinvented the entire system,” said co-author Emily Langhorne. “The city separated the work of managing schools from operating them, embraced diverse school models, and prioritized student achievement above bureaucratic tradition.”

While acknowledging that New Orleans’ unique circumstances may not be replicable everywhere, the authors emphasize that the core principles of autonomy, accountability, and choice can be adapted to other urban districts facing systemic failure.

Read and download the report here.

The Reinventing America’s Schools Project seeks to refocus national leadership around proven strategies to improve public schools and educational achievement. We believe that American public schools must prepare children academically to be successful adults and citizens; families should have a voice in their child’s education, including a choice within the public system to find a school that best fits their child’s needs; and, though education is the province of the states, the federal government must protect the promise that every child will have access to a quality public education.

Founded in 1989, PPI is a catalyst for policy innovation and political reform based in Washington, D.C. Its mission is to create radically pragmatic ideas for moving America beyond ideological and partisan deadlock. Find an expert and learn more about PPI by visiting progressivepolicy.org. Follow us @PPI

###

Media Contact: Ian OKeefe – iokeefe@ppionline.org

Jacoby for Forbes: Ukraine Looks Abroad For Joint Ventures To Boost Its Defense Industry

Before Russia invaded in 2022, Pyotr Ivanenko produced sports equipment in Ukraine’s second largest city, Kharkiv. When Russian troops surrounded the city, bombarding it relentlessly and prompting three-quarters of the population to flee, Ivanenko, a fit man with a shaved head and ice green eyes, made a decision. “I needed to change what I was doing,” he told me an interview, “to switch to making what the country needs.” (Ivanenko is not his real name—he requested a pseudonym to protect his business and his family.)

By 2023, he was churning out homegrown armored vehicles—his company makes everything but the engines—and angling for a contract with the defense ministry. By 2025, he had developed two types of unmanned ground vehicles that can transport supplies to remote military positions, evacuate wounded soldiers, and carry a mounted gun into hostile territory, allowing a gunner in the rear to fire at the enemy from close range.

Now, like almost all Ukrainian arms manufacturers, Ivanenko has a problem. His defense ministry contract is coming to an end, and although he sells personnel carriers and robotized vehicles to fighting units all along the front line, he says he could make 10 times as many if the government had the money to buy them. But the 2025 Ukrainian budget allocates just $17.5 billion to purchase weapons, exactly half the $35 billon in equipment the domestic arms industry says it can produce. Virtually all manufacturers, large and small, are clamoring for some kind of relief.

Read more in Forbes.

20 Years of Reinvention: Education Reform in New Orleans

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

On August 29, 2005, Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans, accelerating the collapse of an already disintegrating city public school system. Prior to the storm, almost two-thirds of New Orleans public school students attended failing schools, half dropped out, and fewer than one in five enrolled in college. The school system suffered severe financial mismanagement, corruption, and crumbling school infrastructures.

Yet in the midst of a national tragedy came an unprecedented opportunity for education reform. Louisiana transferred 80% of the city’s public schools to the state-run Recovery School District (RSD), which, over the next decade, converted them all into charter schools. The elected Orleans Parish School Board (OPSB) turned most of its 17 remaining schools into charters as well. In 2018, the state “reunified” the RSD schools with the local school board. By 2020, the OPSB had converted its last two schools to charters, making New Orleans the first large U.S. school district composed entirely of charter schools.

This sweeping education reform led to remarkable academic gains. Over the last 20 years, student outcomes have grown substantially. Despite harder assessments, students have jumped ten percentage points in reading and math at fourth and eighth grade, and graduation and college enrollments have rocketed by more than twenty percentage points. In 2024, not a single New Orleans school was rated as “failing” by the state accountability system.

The New Orleans model will not translate perfectly to all American districts, given the unique circumstances of post-Katrina recovery. Nonetheless, elements of its approach provide a compelling blueprint for large bureaucratic districts. These include:

  • Significant school autonomy, so school leaders have the freedom they need to craft schools that meet their students’ needs.
  • Accountability for student performance, including the opportunity for schools to expand and/or replicate if successful, and to face replacement or closure if not.
  • Full choice between a diverse array of educational models.
  • Competition for students and dollars among schools.
  • A board and superintendent largely freed of responsibility for operating schools, enabling them to concentrate on system-wide needs and issues.

The reinvention of New Orleans’ public schools represents both stunning success and critical lessons. If every major American public school system could achieve similar improvements, the effect on children across the nation would be profound.

Read the full report.

 

Manno for Philanthropy Daily: A Donor Playbook for Local Workforce Renewal

The promise of upward mobility remains unmet for many of America’s workers. Within the labor market, frustrations abound, for workers and employers alike:

  • Employers face labor shortages while capable workers remain locked in low-wage
  • Workers without college degrees and other familiar credentials can’t translate their skills into the parlance of employers who use recognizable credentials to screen for jobs.
  • Education and training programs and placement agencies struggle to find jobs for their graduates because they don’t know which workplace career trajectories lead to upward mobility.

Failing to resolve these and other stumbling blocks is especially frustrating since today’s “big data” creates more information about employers, workers, and opportunities than ever before. Today’s “challenge isn’t gathering more information—it’s making sense of the information we have and putting it to work,” according to the Burning Glass Institute report Jobs That Mobilize: A Data‑Driven Playbook for America’s Workforce.

The Jobs That Mobilize report describes a structured, six-step framework and process for bringing together community stakeholders to promote worker upward mobility. Donors can use the report to take a lead role in marshaling partnerships, supporting evidence-based strategies, and building community capacity and structures to align education, training, employer needs, and worker aspirations. They can create cross-sector partnerships, invest in innovation, and foster system-wide action on workforce development issues.

Read more in Philanthropy Daily.

Jacoby for Washington Monthly: Trump, Zelensky, and European Leaders Got Along—Mostly by Sidestepping the Big Issues

The seven European leaders who accompanied President Volodymyr Zelensky to the White House on Monday made little secret of why they had suddenly interrupted their summer vacations to make the trip. They believed they might need to shield the Ukrainian leader from the disparagement and bullying he had to endure on his last Oval Office in February.

In the end, that wasn’t necessary. Host Donald Trump was jovial and eager to get along with his guests. He complimented Zelensky on his suit-like attire and flattered the seven Europeans— NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, and Finnish President Alexander Stubb—each with a personalized compliment. They flattered back with even more lavish and ingratiating thanks and praise, and everyone seemed to go home happy.

The questions left hanging amid all the smiles and good cheer: what exactly did they discuss—and what issues, if any, were settled?

Read more in Washington Monthly.

Las Vegas unemployment is up 12% this summer

FACT: Las Vegas unemployment is up 12% this summer.

THE NUMBERS: Canadians returning home from U.S. visits by car –

July 2025 1.69 million
July 2024 2.68 million

StatCanada

WHAT THEY MEAN: 

Then-President Ronald Reagan’s closing, bringing the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement into force in September 1988:

“Let the 5,000-mile border between Canada and the United States stand as a symbol for the future.  No soldier stands guard to protect it.  Barbed wire does not deface it. And no invisible barrier of economic suspicion and fear will extend it. Let it forever be not a point of division but a meeting place between our great and true friends.”

Reagan’s brief 729-word talk enthuses over the North American future in practical as well as idealistic terms — “lower prices for consumers, job galore for workers, new markets for producers”; “a rich flow of agriculture and energy resources from one country to another” — and takes some particular pride in the agreement’s innovative services provisions “in such areas as accounting, insurance, tourism, and engineering.”

A generation later, he doesn’t seem to have gotten much wrong. The U.S. and Canada have the world’s largest goods-trade relationship: $412 billion in Canadian energy, metals, grains, etc., serve American homes, utilities, and factories, while Canadians buy $350 billion in U.S. goods, more than any other country and fully a sixth of the U.S.’ $2.1 trillion worldwide export total.  Nor was Reagan off on services and tourism.  Last year, American figures show 20.1 million Canadian tourist arrivals, a number equivalent to half of the 41 million Canadians. An example from Las Vegas, an especially tourism-dependent city: Canadian visitors typically stay 5.5 days at a stretch, and spend more per day on hotels, shopping, and meals than anyone but Australians. By the University of Nevada/Las Vegas count, they support about 43,200 Clark County jobs, add $3.6 billion to Nevada GDP, and lift local per capita income by $368.

This is what Mr. Trump is inexplicably trying to throw away, beginning with a bad-faith Feb. 1 “emergency” decree citing border issues, in particular drug trafficking, as justification for a 25% tariff on Canadian-made goods. (Tariffs and bans on legal products are rarely if ever useful responses to narcotics issues, and there’s very little there anyway: per U.S. Customs and Border Protection stats report “northern border” patrols accounted for 0.1% of last year’s fentanyl seizures, 0% for heroin, 3% for marijuana, and 0.1% for methamphetamine.)  Following that have come months of “51st state” insults and veiled threats, oscillating tariff decrees for cars and aluminum, and wholly unfounded claims that the U.S. is somehow “subsidizing” Canada.

This has done some visible economic harm to Canada — GDP growth down a point, unemployment and inflation visibly, if not drastically up — and brought a reaction, both from the Canadian public and in Canada’s larger strategy. That in turn is helping to sap American growth and employment. Two examples:

(1) Export losses: Canadians this summer have been looking for visibly American consumer goods, so as not to buy them. This has cut American wine, spirits, and beer exports by more than half, from $247 million in the first half of 2024 to $91 million so far this year, or by about 7 million gallons:

U.S. exports to Canada Jan-June 2024 Jan-June 2025
Wine 24.4 million liters 11.6 million liters
Spirits   9.1 million liters   6.1 million liters
Beer 14.5 million liters   6.9 million liters

(2) Tourist visits: Much the same shows up in canceled air routeslower searches for homes, and especially tourist visits. Just as they helped to show the success of North American integration through 2024, they now show unraveling and loss. StatCanada suggests Canadian tourist visits are down by a third: they counted 2.7 million returning Canadian cars in July 2024, and 1.7 million last month. As a particular case study, Las Vegas’s 1.4 million Canadian tourist visits make up more than a quarter of all international arrivals.  This year’s sharp drop in Canadian arrivals has accordingly made 2025 a bad one, with total visitor counts down by more than 10% and Clark County unemployment rolls up by 8,000 from April to June.

“[L]ack of Canadian visitors to casino resorts is a significant factor in Las Vegas traffic falling … Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (LVCVA) and major casino operators data for June released this week showed that total visitation to the resort city fell by 11.3% to 3.1 million. June was the sixth month in a row in which the number of Vegas travelers fell year-over-year, but the first month in which the drop-off was in the double digits in more than four years.”

More generally, as jobs and income seep away out of U.S. casinos, distilleries, vineyards and hotels, an assessment this spring from Canadian Prime Minister Carney provides a chilly next-generation counterpoint to Reagan’s enthusiastic and then-bipartisan vision of trust, integration, and shared destiny:

“Our old relationship with the United States, a relationship based on steadily increasing integration, is over. … When I sit down with President Trump, it will be to discuss the future economic and security relationship between two sovereign nations. And it will be with our full knowledge that we have many, many other options than the United States to build prosperity for all Canadians.”

Those seeking a useful case study in folly and unprovoked self-harm won’t do much better than those. Those seeking a bright spot: Canadians probably haven’t quite given up. A recent Pew poll, for example, finds that while “approval” of the U.S. is badly down at 34%, and 59% of Canadians view the U.S. as their “greatest threat,” a slightly smaller majority of 55% also still thinks of the U.S. as “greatest ally.”

In sum, this problem is self-created and probably not insoluble. All that’s necessary to start is for the U.S. government to be an honorable ally and good neighbor to a friendly country. Pretty much all American presidents have managed this up to now, so it can’t be that hard.

FURTHER READING

PPI’s four principles for response to tariffs and economic isolationism:

  • Defend the Constitution and oppose rule by decree;
  • Connect tariff policy to growth, work, prices and family budgets, and living standards;
  • Stand by America’s neighbors and allies;
  • Offer a positive alternative.

In better times:

Then-Pres. Reagan signs the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement, September 1988.

PM Mulroney pitches the idea to anxious Canadians, December 1987.

… and from the Canadian Embassy, U.S.-Canada state-by-state trade data.

Now:

The Trump administration’s Feb. 1 emergency decree claims a northern-border “emergency.”

… CBP drug-seizure stats don’t show one.

Up north:

PM Mark Carney assesses in April …

… responds to August 1 tariff threats: preserve USMCA, diversify Canada’s options, reform at home.

… and speculates on a Canada-EU future.

And the Pew Center polls Canadians on views of President Biden, Mr. Trump, and the United States.

Nevada focus:

StatCanada counts shrinking numbers of tourists returning home.

… Air Canada likewise.

UNLV’s Center for Business and Economic Research has research and data updates on Las Vegas, Clark County, and Nevada.

Las Vegas hotels and casinos gloomily report falling occupancy and revenue.

… and the Las Vegas Review-Journal concurs, finding the city’s employment rate the second-highest in the U.S. this year.

Hawaii’s tourist authority has a similar but not quite as bleak outlook.

ABOUT ED

Ed Gresser is Vice President and Director for Trade and Global Markets at PPI.

Ed returns to PPI after working for the think tank from 2001-2011. He most recently served as the Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Trade Policy and Economics at the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). In this position, he led USTR’s economic research unit from 2015-2021, and chaired the 21-agency Trade Policy Staff Committee.

Ed began his career on Capitol Hill before serving USTR as Policy Advisor to USTR Charlene Barshefsky from 1998 to 2001. He then led PPI’s Trade and Global Markets Project from 2001 to 2011. After PPI, he co-founded and directed the independent think tank ProgressiveEconomy until rejoining USTR in 2015. In 2013, the Washington International Trade Association presented him with its Lighthouse Award, awarded annually to an individual or group for significant contributions to trade policy.

Ed is the author of Freedom from Want: American Liberalism and the Global Economy (2007). He has published in a variety of journals and newspapers, and his research has been cited by leading academics and international organizations including the WTO, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund. He is a graduate of Stanford University and holds a Master’s Degree in International Affairs from Columbia Universities and a certificate from the Averell Harriman Institute for Advanced Study of the Soviet Union.

Read the full email and sign up for the Trade Fact of the Week.

Moss for The Hill: The Misery of Auto Tariffs is Hitting Families and Factories

It’s not as though we couldn’t have seen it coming. Section 4.26 of the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 made the case for tariffs on imported goods. The document argued that tariffs will force U.S. companies to onshore manufacturing.

Trump’s style of threatening and coercing U.S. trading partners with high tariffs has increased the toxicity of trade policy. This has all made for a rough start, with initial tariff announcements roiling the stock and bond markets and stoking consumer fear and uncertainty.

But now, two things have become clear. First, the Trump approach to tariffs has confused companies and the financial markets. Since March, employment has plummeted in industries with increased exposure to higher tariff-related costs. Second, and more important, the price of the chaos has come due, and it’s being paid largely by working Americans.

The trade wars reveal just how much Trump has sold a bill of goods to his political base. Tariffs drive up prices to U.S. consumers, both directly and indirectly. Tariffs on imported finished goods, and components that are used in domestic manufacturing, are passed on to consumers directly through higher prices, as we’ve seen with coffee. Tariffs also stifle competition from abroad by making imports more expensive. This loss of competition can spur domestic price increases, as we’ve seen with tariffs on imported solar panels.

Read more in The Hill. 

Revisiting Colorado’s AI Law

PPI recently released a report arguing that regulating artificial intelligence (AI) at the state level will create a patchwork of conflicting state laws that “risks stifling innovation, raising compliance costs, and repeating the federal failures seen in data privacy regulation.” That’s why we wholeheartedly support Colorado Governor Jared Polis’ move to encourage state legislators to delay implementation of Colorado’s first-of-its-kind comprehensive state law regulating the development and deployment of AI systems.

Last year, Gov. Polis signed the bill into law. However, in his signing statement, Gov. Polis criticized the law for instituting a “complex compliance regime.” He also warned of the potential harm to innovation and competition from state-level AI laws.

The law’s implementation was originally scheduled for February 2026. Now Polis has called Colorado state lawmakers back for a special session, starting August 21, to address the state’s budget problems, including the additional financial costs of enforcing the AI law.

Moreover, the law, if implemented in its current form, could paralyze Colorado’s tech-driven economic growth, which has been the envy of policymakers around the country. Since 2019, Colorado’s internet and software industries have added more than 20,000 jobs. Further growth could be choked off if the new law diverts AI spending to other states.

Let’s hope that Gov. Polis is able to successfully address Colorado’s impending economic and fiscal squeeze from the AI law during the upcoming special session. That would be beneficial not just for Colorado but as a good example for other states considering AI regulations.

Jacoby on Washington Monthly’s Politics Roundtable: Trump Just Gave Putin Everything He Wanted

Trump’s recent summit with Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, ended not in toughness but in capitulation. Despite pledging red lines beforehand, Trump rolled out the red carpet, and has now appeared to endorse Moscow’s demands for the surrender of Ukrainian territory. In this week’s episode of the Washington Monthly politics roundtable, special guest Tamar Jacoby, Director of the New Ukraine Project at the Progressive Policy Institute, shares reaction on the ground in Kyiv to Trump’s betrayal of Ukraine. She also suggests steps Trump should be taking instead to regain the advantage over Putin.

Listen to the full podcast. 

Jacoby for Washington Monthly: How to Reverse Trump’s Capitulation to Putin

Last week was a relatively good week in Kyiv. Despite all the hype and hoopla swirling in the Western media, few Ukrainians expected much from the summit in Anchorage. But in the run-up to the meeting, Vladimir Putin was eager to get on Donald Trump’s good side, and he showed some restraint in launching missile and drone attacks. There were no significant air alerts in the capital city for a week. Residents got their first full night’s sleep in many months, and it showed in the mood—everyone seemed just a little kinder and more cheerful. “Now, if only we can survive the peace,” one active-duty soldier joked, looking ahead to the Alaska talks.

When the news came late Friday, no one in Kyiv was surprised that the meeting had fizzled. If anything, there was a sigh of relief—no deal had been made above Ukrainian heads.

Now the grim reality is setting in—in Kyiv and across the West. If all the silly talk and false hope leading up the summit served any purpose, it was to remind the world that war is still raging in Europe. It also helped concentrate minds—among Western publics and politicians—on the end game in Ukraine.

Keep reading in Washington Monthly.

Manno for Forbes: Parents Reshape K-12 Public Education As Students Go Back To School

It’s back-to-school season, with an estimated 47.2 million K-12 public school students and 3.2 million teachers returning to their classrooms. They come back to a K-12 system offering an expanding menu of public education choices for families (and teachers) that are leading parents to reshape public education. A Tyton Partners report dubs them “activated parents.” While COVID-19 accelerated this parent uprising, other longer-term forces set the stage for it.

Upheaval In The Making

Three factors have fueled a slow but relentless wave of K-12-activated parent upheaval, one that began before COVID-19 but gained unstoppable momentum during and after the pandemic.

  • Expansion of public school choice. Over more than 60 years, K-12 policy changes have created a variety of public school choices for families. They now include options such as magnet schools, charter schools, microschools, learning pods, open enrollment, dual enrollment, course choice, tutoring, homeschooling, and career pathways programs. Moreover, families can mix-and-match these options. For example, more than a third of homeschool families also use traditional district public schools, and another 9% have a child in a charter public school.
  • Rising dissatisfaction with public education. A Gallup poll shows that satisfaction with public education has declined. Between 2017 and 2025 , the share of adults satisfied with the quality of public education fell from 37% to 24%, reflecting a broader erosion of confidence in U.S. institutions. The 2025 Phi Delta Kappan poll reports that Americans’ confidence in K-12 public schools is at an all-time low. Only 13% grade them an A or a B, down from 19% in 2019 and 26% in 2004. Adults have more positive attitudes toward their local schools, with over 40% grading them highly.
  • Public funding for private school access. Policy changes over more than 35 years in 33 states have created 81 different K-12 programs that give families public funding to cover the costs associated with private schools. These programs include vouchers, tax credits, and education savings accounts.

Continue reading in Forbes. 

Ritz for Forbes: On Social Security’s 90th Birthday, A New Idea To Solve Its Shortfall

Since it was signed into law 90 years ago today, Social Security has become the most successful antipoverty program in American history and the foundation upon which most Americans plan their retirement. But changing demographics and policy mistakes have weakened that foundation and put the program on track for a crisis before the end of the next president’s term. Policymakers must act quickly to strengthen the program without imposing an unfair burden on vulnerable seniors or working Americans.

At its conception, Social Security was designed to be an “earned benefit” — workers pay a dedicated payroll tax on wages up to a certain level, and once these workers reach retirement age, they receive benefits to replace some fraction of the wages upon which they were taxed. But in practice, funds paid in by today’s workers are used to pay the benefits due to today’s retirees. And every year since 2010, the program has spent more on benefits than it raised in dedicated revenue because the ratio of workers to retirees is worsening as our population ages.

Unfortunately, today’s policymakers have only compounded the problem. Last year, bipartisan majorities in Congress voted overwhelmingly to give higher-income retirees already receiving public pensions the opportunity to draw more generous benefits. And earlier this year, Republicans siphoned off a portion of the program’s revenue stream in their “One Big Beautiful Bill.”

Keep reading in Forbes.