Moss in Bloomberg Law: Disney-Fox-Warner Streaming Deal Faces DOJ Antitrust Review

When Disney bought assets from Fox in 2018, the Justice Department agreed to allow the deal to move forward except for the assets related to sports, calling them “two of the country’s most valuable cable sports properties.”

The same year, the Justice Department lost its effort to block AT&T Inc.’s merger with Time Warner, arguing the deal would let the telecom giant threaten to withhold programming to maximize its profits. Antitrust enforcers argued that the combination of AT&T’s TV-distribution network with Time Warner’s programming would lead to higher prices for consumers. A judge rejected that argument, and an appeals court upheld his decision.

But within a few years, AT&T spun off the business to Discovery Inc. The Justice Department reviewed the deal and ultimately opted against a challenge, though antitrust enforcers warned the companies they could reopen a probe later if warranted.

The Biden administration has been particularly critical of joint ventures in some markets, breaking up a partnership between American Airlines Group Inc. and JetBlue Airways Corp. last year, according to Diana Moss, vice president and director of competition policy at the Progressive Policy Institute.

“They’ve made it look very consumer-friendly in terms of the access issue,” she said. “But as always, the devil is going to be in the details in terms of how hard they compete with each other.”

Read more in Bloomberg Law. 

Untapped Expertise: Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) as Charter School Authorizers

Washington, D.C. — For generations, Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) have been a catalyst for education progress in America, including transforming K-12 education through a combination of initiatives and programs designed to meet the aspirations of students who often lack opportunities. And yet, when parents demand new and better schools for their children, HBCUs continue to represent an under-utilized source of expertise that can help redesign the 21st-century public education system.

Today, the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) and the National Association of Charter School Authorizers (NACSA) released a report titled “Untapped Expertise: Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) as Charter School Authorizers,” which makes the case for expanded partnerships between charter schools and HBCUs to become charter school authorizers. Authorizers are governmentally approved and supervised entities that oversee academic, financial, and operational expectations and school performance. Quality authorizing is a catalyst for expanding access to quality educational opportunities for students and families, especially communities of color.

Report authors Curtis Valentine, Co-Director of PPI’s Reinventing America’s Schools Project, and Karega Rausch, President and CEO of NACSA, argue that HBCUs are natural partners for charter schools due to their long history in education reform and pre-existing relationships. To speed up the pace of school improvement and modernization, America needs more quality charter school authorizers. Currently, the states with the most HBCUs do not allow for higher education authorizers, and the report’s authors call on policymakers to create pathways for capable HBCUs to become strong charter school authorizers.

“HBCUs have played a powerful role in our nation’s education system for generations. As an alumnus of an HBCU, I know firsthand the untapped expertise HBCUs can have on our K-12 education, especially for charter schools — which play a vital role in lowering systemic barriers to high-quality education,” said Curtis Valentine. “HBCUs becoming charter school authorizers is a new and transformative way of achieving that end.”

“Excellent schools built from the aspirations of families remain the north star and high-quality authorizing is key in achieving that end,” said Karega Rausch. “Authorizing well is hard work and we look forward to working with policymakers to create thoughtful pathways for willing HBCUs to be outstanding authorizers.”

The report outlines the steps that state policymakers should take to empower our nation’s HBCUs to become strong charter school authorizers. Charter schools have proven to be a powerful tool for boosting student achievement, especially among low-income families and families of color. By becoming charter school authorizers, HBCUs can build on their historical legacy of transforming K-12 education by strengthening ties between K-12 and higher education and creating strong community institutions that provide opportunities for economic growth.

Read and download the report here.

The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) is a catalyst for policy innovation and political reform based in Washington, D.C. Its mission is to create radically pragmatic ideas for moving America beyond ideological and partisan deadlock. Learn more about PPI by visiting progressivepolicy.org. Find an expert at PPI and follow us on Twitter.

The National Association of Charter School Authorizers (NACSA) advances and strengthens the ideas and practices of authorizing so students and communities—especially those who are historically under-resourced—thrive. NACSA believes that quality authorizing is essential and must balance access, autonomy, and accountability in overseeing the overall performance of their portfolios of schools. Find out more about authorizing and NACSA at qualitycharters.org.

###

Media Contact:

Amelia Fox – afox@ppionline.org, Courtney Hughley – courtneyh@qualitycharters.org

Untapped Expertise: Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) as Charter School Authorizers

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

For generations, Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) have been a catalyst for transformation in K-12 through initiatives, including diversifying teaching pipelines, starting new schools, and establishing programs designed to meet the aspirations of students far away from quality opportunities.

And yet, in many ways, we have not yet realized the full potential for how HBCUs can drive educational opportunities for all K-12 students. At a time when parents across the country are demanding new and better schools for their children, HBCUs represent an under-tapped source of expertise. This is especially relevant for Black families because of the disproportionate impact that unfinished learning has on them and the systemic barriers to high-quality education that this community has historically faced. HBCUs have a unique history, legacy, and record of advancing Black achievement and wellness, which makes them ideal partners in redesigning public education for the 21st century.

Elevating HBCUs’ Role in K-12 Education

HBCUs and their alumni have played powerful roles in K-12 public education, including charter schools. Alumni are leading outstanding charter learning institutions with exceptional student outcomes, and some HBCUs have partnered with charter schools in effective ways including integrating charter schools on their campuses. This arrangement provides students with a unique experience in which they are introduced to the promise and prestige of higher education earlier in their educational journey. And we believe it is merely the start of a partnership that can have a profound difference in the lives of underserved communities.

Charter schools have proven to be a powerful tool for boosting student achievement, especially among low-income families and families of color. Charter schools are public schools, free and open to all students. They currently serve nearly four million students across 7,700 schools in 45 states and the District of Columbia. When permitted to thrive, charter schools offer families a variety of educational options from which to choose the best fit for their child. They are the opposite of one-size-fits-all schooling. Their unique blend of parental choice, school autonomy, personalized learning, and strict accountability for results illuminates the way toward higher-performing schools for all U.S. students, regardless of their zip code. They create a healthy mix of different types of public schools that helps improve all of public education.

What makes public charter schools innovative and nimble is how they are governed and overseen. The key is charter school authorizers — governmentally approved and supervised entities that decide who is qualified to start a charter school and receive public funding. They determine each school’s academic, financial, and operational expectations; oversee school performance; enforce contractual performance and compliance expectations; and decide which schools should be given the privilege of continuing to educate students.

A practical barrier to quality public school options is the shortage of effective governance and oversight provided by charter school authorizers.

When done well, authorizing is a catalyst for expanding access to quality educational opportunities for students, families, and communities, especially those that have been overlooked, undervalued, and ignored.

But when done poorly — due to overregulation, insufficient institutional commitment, micromanagement, sheer incompetence, or inherent conflicts of interest — weak authorizing contributes to educational failure.

Authorizing charter schools is a relatively new way of making transformative change in K-12 governance and oversight. HBCUs as authorizers is a means to a critical end and one HBCUs have been doing since their inception: better educational opportunities for all students.

To speed the pace of school improvement and modernization, America needs more strong charter school authorizers. Given their capacities and expertise, the nation’s HBCUs are natural candidates to assume this role.

Recommendations for Policymakers:

NACSA and PPI urge state policymakers to take the following steps to start empowering willing HBCUs to become strong charter school authorizers:

• Query college leaders to determine if there is at least one HBCU interested in becoming a high-quality charter school authorizer (HBCUs can contact state policymakers directly to express interest);

• Examine national best practices on quality authorizing and how other states have structured authoring infrastructures to determine the best fit for your state;

• Determine the scope of HBCU authorizing (e.g. one institution or multiple institutions) and any other limitations (e.g. only HBCUs of a certain size);

• Enact legislation allowing for one or more HBCUs to be authorizers;

• Ensure there is sufficient funding and resources for authorizing functions.

A Stronger Future for Education

By becoming charter school authorizers, HBCUs can build on their historical legacy of transforming K-12 education in at least four ways:

1. Redesigning Public Education: Overseeing and expanding quality public school options to improve the outcomes of all students.

2. Building on educational legacies: Overseeing high-quality and effective K-12 schools can help HBCUs build on their rich legacy by deepening connections with local communities.

3. Strengthening ties between K-12 and higher education: HBCU authorizers can develop unique partnerships with schools they oversee, providing access to higher education campuses, creating pipelines of new students, opportunities for dual enrollment, mentorship programs between schools and students, and research opportunities between faculty and schools.

4. Creating strong community institutions and wealth: New charter schools create new facilities and jobs, with opportunities for economic growth in communities, such as Black vendors who can provide new charter schools with products and services.

Our country needs stronger educational opportunities that advance the learning of all students, Black students in particular. HBCUs as charter school authorizers is a transformative way of achieving this goal. For HBCUs looking to expand their impact and strengthen their own institutions, becoming a charter school authorizer is an idea whose time has come.

Read the full report. 

Ainsley in The New York Times: The U.K. Labour Party’s Worst Enemy Might Be Itself

The drama over the green policy allowed the Conservatives to paint Labour as a party of U-turns and flip-flops. But Labour allies said that was a reasonable price to pay to avoid being tarred as fiscally irresponsible. Mr. Starmer and Ms. Reeves are determined to reassure voters that taxes will not rise under Labour and that the party can be trusted with the public finances.

“There are some really serious considerations about the country’s fiscal position, Labour’s policy priorities, and how they match what they want to do in government with the reality they are going to face,” said Claire Ainsley, a former policy director for Mr. Starmer.

“I am not surprised if that took some weeks, if not months, for there to be proper conversations,” said Ms. Ainsley, who now works in Britain for the Progressive Policy Institute, a Washington-based research institute.

Read more in The New York Times. 

Jacoby for Capital Tonight NC with Tim Boyum

We’re now just 10 days out from the next Republican presidential primary. A new poll from Winthrop University is taking a look at the race.

The director of Winthrop’s Center for Public Opinion and Policy Research, Dr. Scott Huffmon, joins with more.

Meanwhile, Congress continues to face roadblocks in passing an aid package for Ukraine.

Tamar Jacoby is the director of the Progressive Policy Institute’s New Ukraine Project and currently lives in Kyiv. She joins virtually with more.

Watch the interview here.

Trade Fact of the Week: Each January, the U.S. imports 11 million roses a day

FACT: Each January, the U.S. imports 11 million roses a day.

THE NUMBERS: Top sources of roses, January 2023 –
Colombia 177 million stems
Ecuador 137 million stems
Guatemala     4 million stems
Ethiopia     2 million stems
Mexico     1 million stems
Kenya     0.4 million stems

 

WHAT THEY MEAN:

Geoffrey Chaucer’s 699-line Parliament of Fowls (1382) makes the first English-language link between flowers, romance, and Valentine’s Day. The relevant passage:

“I]n a launde, upon an hille of floures,
Was set this noble goddesse Nature;
Of braunches were hir halles and hir boures,
Y-wrought after hir craft and hir mesure;
Ne ther nas foul that cometh of engendrure,
That they ne were prest in hir presence,
To take hir doom and yeve hir audience.
For this was on seynt Valentynes day,
Whan every foul cometh ther to chese his make.*

* “When every bird comes to choose his mate.”

Seven centuries later, the National Retail Federation guesses Americans will spend about $25.8 billion on Valentine gifts this year.  A tenth of the money, $2.5 billion, goes to flowers. Before this evening’s candles light up, here’s a quick look at the four-step network of agriculture and farm labor, truckers and and pilots, policy professionals and front-line civil service workers, and small businesses that get the long-stemmed reds from tropical farms to florist storefront to you:

Growing and Picking: Worldwide flower trade totals about $10 billion annually. The Dutch are the top importers, with Americans second at about $2 billion per year. Colombia was last year’s top U.S. source at $1.1 billion, followed by Ecuador at $500 million. U.S. domestic floriculture, a $6.5 billion industry, supplies about a quarter of U.S. flowers, and centers more on garden and potted plants than cut stems.

By bloom type, 2.7 billion roses accounted for half the value of U.S. imports. Colombia provides about 1.5 billion stems, grown on about 8600 hectares of farmland near Bogota and harvested by about 100,000 rural workers. Next door Ecuador’s 1.0 billion are not far behind. The remaining 200 million roses arrive variously from Guatemala, Mexico, Ethiopia, and Kenya; among other flowers, Thailand is the top orchid source and Costa Rica places near the top in lilies.

Transport: Roses arrive year-round, but the large import pulses in late January/early February and late April/early May — just before Valentine’s Day and Mother’s Day — include about half of annual deliveries. The short life of a blossom means that flower trade is mainly an air cargo business.  Once picked and boxed, roses travel in chilled trucks from farms to El Dorado airport near Bogota and Mariscal Sucre in Ecuador, with most Valentine’s roses — about 90% — arriving at Miami International Airport via (according to USDA) 30-35 daily chartered wide-body flights. Likewise in early May, orchid farms around Bangkok connect via Tokyo to deliver most U.S. prom-night corsages.

Transit: Customs and Border Protection officers inspect the incoming flowers for phytosanitary health on arrival at Miami. CBP reports inspecting 1.23 billion flowers at the airport last year and intercepting 1,975 pests — mostly nursery-threatening thrips, moths, and caterpillars rather than customer-intimidating scorpions or tarantulas.

Policy: Though technically assigned a 6.5% tariff, most flowers arrive in the U.S. duty-free under free trade agreements and “preference” programs. The U.S.-Colombia FTA waives the tariff for roses (and chrysanthemums, lilies, etc), saving florists and their customers about $65 million a year. The African Growth and Opportunity does the same for Ethiopian and Kenyan blossoms. Florists buying Ecuadoran roses and Thai orchids, though, must wait for Congress to revive the Generalized System of Preferences to get the same benefit.

And last: Having landed at the airport about a week ago, flower shipments move by refrigerated truck or domestic cargo flight to wholesalers and warehouses. By Monday, they have reached the roughly 12,000 American florists (mostly small businesses, employing about 64,000 people this year according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics); and from them to you.

So that’s the business side. Last word to Chaucer, also from the Parliament:

The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne,     / The life so short, the art so hard to learn.
Th’assay so hard, so sharp the conquering,  / The attempt so hard, the conquest so sharp
The dredful Ioy, that alwey slit so yerne,       / The fearful joy, that ever slips away so fast
Al this mene I by love.                                   / By all this I mean love.

FURTHER READING

Chaucer’s Parlement of Foules:

The original Middle English; Seynt Valentyne shows up in lines 305-312.

A modern-English translation.

Chaucer was a trade professional as well as a romantic poet, having spent the years 1374-1386 tallying wool exports and wine tariff revenue as Richard II’s Controller of Customs. They paid him 10 pounds a year plus a gallon of wine per day, and he wrote the Parliament in off hours.  The U.K.’s National Archives looks at Chaucer’s trade policy career.

From flower-bed to florist: 

The Colombian Flower Growers Association, ASCOLFLORES, recalls its first U.S.-Colombia FTA shipment.

Air cargo firms manage Colombia-to-Miami charters.

Miami International Airport (2023) explains flower transit.

Customs and Border Protection on letting flowers in while keeping thrips out.

The National Retail Federation’s 2024 Valentine forecast.

V-Day stats from the Society of American Florists.

… and also from the SAF, an appeal for GSP reauthorization.

Elsewhere:

The Netherlands is the world’s largest flower buyer at about $5.4 billion a year, or half of the value of flower trade. Most of this transits the gigantic Aalsmeer flower market just outside Amsterdam, which serves as the center for European flower trade and the main market for growers in Kenya and Ethiopia. Royal Flora Holland has the facts and figures.

And last:

How did roses become the Valentine’s Day standard? It’s likely no one really knows, but one theory traces the tradition to a series of letters sent to U.K. friends in 1718 by Mary Wortley Montagu from the Ottoman court, and published in book form a half-century later in 1763. (The Ottoman nobility were rose and tulip enthusiasts; roses are Persian by origin.) Letter #42 records a ‘flower language’ in which seraglio ladies assigned emotional meanings to different flowers and luxury products, and used them to send coded notes to friends and outside admirers.  Nineteenth-century French and Brits then built this into a gigantic “flower language” (“floriography”); an 1819 book by Charlotte Delatour cataloged meanings for 713 flowers (including 29 separate rose varieties), nursery plants, and other garden products such as fruits and tree branches.

People with deep gardening expertise and memorization powers could use this to convey signals pretty far beyond modern candy-heart romance — all the way (at least to a modern eye) from “platonic affection” and “romantic love” to “alternative life-style” and “stalker”.  For example, while a generic rose means “love,” and a white rose means “I am worthy of you,” a dog rose conveys an eyebrow-raising “pleasure and pain” message, and a maiden blush rose a frankly menacing “if you lose me, you will find it out.”

The need to keep these hundreds of definitions straight, and to be very sure you know which rose is which, must have put amateurs at constant risk of embarrassing blunders and awkward misunderstandings.  Modern flower association lists are much shorter and PPI trade staff think it’s probably better that way. Some more examples from Delatour, though, for those interested:

Cypress branch:          “Death and eternal sorrow”
Daffodil:             “Deceitful hope”
Daisy:                 “Beauty and innocence”
“Grass-leaved goosefoot”     “I declare war against you”
Jasmine:             “Sensuality”
Meadow saffron:        “My best days are past”
Potato                “Benevolence”
White poppy            “Sleep”

Lady Mary’s Turkish Embassy Letters.  See Letter 42 for the flower language, also Letter 25 for brief nudity, Letter 9 for a rant against Viennese fashion (“monstrous and contrary to all reason”), and Letter 35 for pioneering vaccination advocacy.

Delatour’s original Artistic Language of Flowers.

And a modern essay on the origins and practice of floriography, with a list of known flower messages.

ABOUT ED

Ed Gresser is Vice President and Director for Trade and Global Markets at PPI.

Ed returns to PPI after working for the think tank from 2001-2011. He most recently served as the Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Trade Policy and Economics at the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). In this position, he led USTR’s economic research unit from 2015-2021, and chaired the 21-agency Trade Policy Staff Committee.

Ed began his career on Capitol Hill before serving USTR as Policy Advisor to USTR Charlene Barshefsky from 1998 to 2001. He then led PPI’s Trade and Global Markets Project from 2001 to 2011. After PPI, he co-founded and directed the independent think tank ProgressiveEconomy until rejoining USTR in 2015. In 2013, the Washington International Trade Association presented him with its Lighthouse Award, awarded annually to an individual or group for significant contributions to trade policy.

Ed is the author of Freedom from Want: American Liberalism and the Global Economy (2007). He has published in a variety of journals and newspapers, and his research has been cited by leading academics and international organizations including the WTO, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund. He is a graduate of Stanford University and holds a Master’s Degree in International Affairs from Columbia Universities and a certificate from the Averell Harriman Institute for Advanced Study of the Soviet Union.

Read the full email and sign up for the Trade Fact of the Week.

Moss for ProMarket: Fans Last? How the Fans First Act Hands Live Nation-Ticketmaster More Market Power

By Diana Moss

It has been just over a year since the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on the dismal state of competition in the ticketing industry in the United States. The hearing was spurred by the epic meltdown of Live Nation-Ticketmaster’s ticketing platform during the sale for the Taylor Swift Eras Tour. The parallel meltdown of Swifties who couldn’t get tickets galvanized public attention, pulling Live Nation again into the spotlight as a leading U.S. monopolist. The live event behemoth has formidably high and stable market positions in ticketing, concert promotion, and venues, including Ticketmaster’s 70% share of the high-profile ticketing market.

Singer-songwriter Clyde Lawrence spoke at the Senate hearing to visible evidence of a broken market—Live Nation-Ticketmaster is often the only choice for artists to sell tickets to their concerts. To appreciate the full harm from the live events monopoly, let’s remember that the Taylor Swift debacle wasn’t the first. Trouble over Ticketmaster’s domination was brewing long before.

Read the full piece in ProMarket.

PPI Proposes Path Forward on White House LNG Export Pause

Washington, D.C. — The Biden administration’s recent decision to pause expansion of LNG export terminals has created uncertainty among producers and consumers of U.S. natural gas, including America’s allies abroad. Today, the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) released a memo to the White House proposing a way forward: Lifting the pause for companies that submit to third-party measurement and certification of their methane emissions.

PPI proposes that the Department of Energy (DOE) act swiftly to design an environmental public interest test for LNG exports that is meaningful, workable, and transparent. Such a test could be built around a third-party verification of methane performance for the entire supply chain. Current certification standards cover roughly one third of U.S. gas production, and ensuring a high environmental standard across exports would benefit both the environment and U.S. companies, especially at a time when major trading partners are implementing similar requirements.

“The indefinite LNG permit pause has created significant uncertainty that risks the economic, national security, and coal-displacement benefits of U.S. LNG exports,” said Elan Sykes, Director of Energy and Climate Policy at PPI. “Paired with key mitigation provisions from the Inflation Reduction Act, methane certification would meet the administration’s climate aims and reassure U.S. allies and trading partners who increasingly depend on a reliable supply of low-methane gas.

U.S. LNG exports play an essential role in meeting global energy demand, especially after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. PPI’s proposal aims to achieve net emissions reductions on a global scale, vital to combating climate change, without disrupting the LNG industry in the U.S. This industry has grown to play a sizable role in the U.S. economy, with jobs that pay well above the national average and $47.4 billion in exports in 2022 driving the energy sector to a record-high 18% share of overall U.S. goods exported that year.

The Biden Administration has made tremendous progress in America’s clean energy transition, especially through the Inflation Reduction Act, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, and the CHIPS Act. The Administration can continue to build on this success by focusing on emissions reductions at home and abroad through faster domestic permitting, deployment of clean energy, and continued innovation to bring down the cost of low-carbon technologies for the world.

###

Media Contact: Amelia Fox – afox@ppionline.org

Ainsley for The Liberal Patriot: The Working-Class Imperative for Labour and Democrats

By Claire Ainsley

Readers of The Liberal Patriot will be familiar with the argument that the Democratic Party needs to reverse its decline with working-class Americans if it is to create durable governing coalitions—or even win at all, judging by the current state of the polls.

This argument has also been playing out in British politics over the past few years. The Labour Party, historically the party of the working class, was comprehensively defeated by Boris Johnson’s Conservatives at the last UK General Election in 2019. Labour’s fourth successive electoral defeat was all the more painful for the loss of what became known as the “Red Wall”  seats, a phrase coined by Conservative pollster James Kanagasooriam to describe parliamentary constituencies who voted Conservative for the first time in their history.

But the reality is that Labour had been losing support amongst working-class voters for two decades, and until Keir Starmer became leader in 2020 it was insufficiently focused on winning over new and traditional working-class voters to the party. Starmer appears to be reversing that decline, according to research by the Progressive Policy Institute, which commissioned a comprehensive poll of working Americans and working-class Brits ahead of the double U.S. and UK elections in 2024. YouGov’s research for PPI shows that Starmer’s Labour are on course to win a majority of working-class voters once again—but Labour’s six point lead amongst this group is narrower than amongst the general population, with polls showing Labour at least 15 points ahead of the Conservatives amongst all voters.

Keep reading in The Liberal Patriot.

Jacoby for The Bulwark: America’s Fleeting Chance to Resume Leadership

By Tamar Jacoby

SENATORS, BOTH REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS, made an important start yesterday when they voted 67 to 32 to advance legislation that would free up $95 billion in military and humanitarian aid for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan. It was, to be sure, just a preliminary, procedural vote. The Senate still needs to pass the bill, and even then it faces long odds in the House of Representatives. But the Senate vote was an overdue step to stop the disastrous downhill slide in American power and influence in the world. The United States faces a choice: to resume its role as what Secretary of State Madeleine Albright called the “indispensable nation,” or to sit by and watch the world become more dangerous for us and our allies.

Opinions vary on when American global leadership began to wane. Some will point to the Vietnam era; others to the post-9/11 wars; still others to the Obama administration’s effort to “lead from behind.” Then there was Donald Trump’s “America first” approach, which actually meant “America alone.”

President Joe Biden got off on the wrong foot on foreign policy in 2021. Even those who felt it made sense to withdraw American troops from Afghanistan can now agree it was done too abruptly, leaving our Afghan allies at the mercy of a Taliban takeover. But then in 2022, the president changed course. Through 2022 and into 2023, the United States took the lead, inspiring and encouraging the world to support Ukraine as it fought off Vladimir Putin’s brutal, unprovoked invasion. Washington got the ball rolling with military aid and intelligence sharing, and soon our allies in Europe and elsewhere were following suit.

Keep reading in The Bulwark.

Kirsty McNeill for LabourList: ‘Here’s what visiting the US taught me about why progressives win or lose’

By Kirsty McNeill, PPC

The Labour Party has one job in 2024: delivering Keir Starmer a majority that is deep, durable, disciplined and democratic.

Deep because, to overcome our catastrophic 2019 result, we must bring over voters from every demographic and every corner of the country.

Durable because Labour has to govern with a relentless focus on deserving a second term so that we can win era-defining change, not just history-defying swings.

Disciplined because the country needs a united team that is prepared to take a long-term view.

And, most of all, democratic because we obsess about securing both ongoing enthusiasm for – and participation in – our ambitious missions.

We visited the US to understand voters’ lack of enthusiasm for Biden

It was with this in mind that a delegation, hosted by the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) and Progressive Britain, travelled to the United States last week.

We were in Washington DC and Virginia to learn from the Democrats and try to understand why voters weren’t more enthusiastic about a presidency of such extraordinary consequence.

Keep reading in LabourList.

 

New data on ridesharing driver earnings

How much do ride-sharing drivers earn? Lyft has just released a paper that sheds light on this important policy question. The paper estimates “earnings after expenses” for drivers on the Lyft platform, based on reasonable and straightforward accounting for additional driver costs such as fuel, maintenance, cleaning, and depreciation.

The Lyft paper finds that the median earnings after expenses per “engaged hour” was $23.46 in the second half of 2023. (Lyft defines an “engaged hour” as time spent driving a passenger, or traveling to pick up a passenger). This figure is a useful “peek under the hood” for a major ridesharing company.

However, there’s another question that the Lyft paper does not address: How does $23.46 stack up against the pay for comparable occupations? To answer this question, PPI used data from the BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), which surveys employers to ask about detailed wages being paid for different occupations.

We pulled several data points from the OEWS. In May 2022, the median hourly wage for taxi drivers was $14.75, including tips. The median hourly wage for “shuttle drivers and chauffeurs” was $15.71, and the median hourly wage for security guards was $16.71. And just to give a backdrop, the median hourly wage for all occupations was $22.26 (yes, that seems low, but that’s what the data shows).

Now, these wage numbers do not include employer-paid benefits, which come to an average of roughly 20% of total compensation for part-time workers (based on BLS data). So we adjust the wage figures upwards to account for benefits.  Table 1 shows the comparison.

Table 1: Ridesharing earnings in perspective
Median hourly wages (OEWS) Adjusted for benefits (assuming part-time)
All occupations           22.26           27.83
Security guards           16.71           20.89
Shuttle drivers and chauffeurs           15.77           19.71
Taxi drivers           14.75           18.44
Hourly earnings after expenses
Drivers on Lyft platform           23.46

 

So we see that hourly earnings after expenses for drivers on the Lyft platform is $23.46, 27% higher than a benefit-adjusted hourly wage of $18.44 for taxi drivers who are employees, and 19% higher than the benefit-adjusted hourly wage for shuttle drivers and chauffeurs.

On the other hand, driver earnings per hour are 16%  lower than the benefit-adjusted median for all occupations, including high-skill white-collar occupations. That makes sense.

One final methodological note: The Lyft figures are based on the concept of “engaged time” — time spent driving a passenger, or traveling to pick up a passenger.  It does not include time spent waiting for the Lyft app to identify the next passenger. On the other hand, if the wait time is too long at a particular time of day, drivers are likely to turn off the app and do something else instead, like study for classes, shop for groceries, or take care of children or the elderly.

Similarly, the BLS hourly wage figures do not include time spent commuting to work. If we accounted for commuting time, then wages per hour would be much lower historically, but they would have soared when Americans shifted to working from home, and fallen as they returned to the workplace. The implication here is that flexibility in work arrangements affects the meaning of wage data, whether we are talking about jobs or gig economy work.

From a policy perspective, the Lyft paper suggests that ridesharing drivers are doing reasonably well in terms of earnings compared to similar occupations. That allows us to concentrate on other aspects of work, such as making sure that regulations and the tax code are modified to give gig economy workers access to the safety net while protecting flexibility for workers including caregivers and workers with disabilities.

 

PPI Reports on the Gig Economy:

Regulatory Improvement for Independent Workers: A New Vision (July 2020)

Platform Work and the Care Economy  (November 2022)

Disability and Changes in the Workplace  (November 2023)

Ritz for Forbes: Alarming CBO Report Shows Unprecedented Interest Costs Starting Next Year

By Ben Ritz

Just as two years of punishing inflation finally appears to have subsided, new projections from the Congressional Budget Office show another major economic problem on the rise. Thanks to excessive deficit spending that worsened inflation and the interest-rate hikes implemented by the Federal Reserve to bring it under control, the U.S. government is now on track to spend a larger share of economic output on annual interest payments next year than at any other point in our nation’s history. Even worse, these costs are projected to more than double over the next 30 years if current law remains unchanged. And the worst part of all: CBO’s projections are more likely than not to deteriorate further based on the agendas being offered by the two major parties heading into the 2024 elections.

CBO’s Budget and Economic Outlooks have shown for years that government debt was on an unsustainable path. As our population ages, spending on retirement programs such as Social Security and Medicare is growing faster than the revenue needed to fund them. If the federal government continues relying on borrowed money to finance growing structural deficits, an ever-growing share of the federal budget will be spent just servicing past debts. That rising cost draws resources away from other critical public investments our government needs to fund and threatens to dampen economic growth.

Previous reports generally suggested this challenge was a long-term one: Just last summer, CBO estimated that annual interest payments as a percent of gross domestic product would remain below the all-time high they reached in 1991 until 2030. But thanks to an unforeseen spike in borrowing costs last fall, CBO now expects the previous record to be broken in 2025.

Keep reading in Forbes.

Maag for The Hill: With fewer degree requirements, the federal government can break the ‘paper ceiling’

By Taylor Maag and Michael Brickman

Education has become one of America’s most significant dividing lines. Those with bachelor’s and advanced degrees have mostly prospered, while employment prospects, wages and advancement opportunities for those with less education have fallen.

Yet, with so much else dividing our country, there is a growing bipartisan consensus that we must tear “the paper ceiling” that denies opportunities to those without at least a bachelor’s degree.

Early in the 2000s, many employers began adding degree requirements to job descriptions — whether they needed them or not — using the degree as a proxy for job preparedness. As a result, workers without a bachelor’s degree were screened out of opportunities. For example, in 2015, 67 percent of production supervisor job postings asked for a four-year college degree, even though just 16 percent of employed production supervisors had graduated from college.

Research from Opportunity@Work found that because of this “degree inflation,” there is a talent pool of skilled workers being left behind in our economy. The data shows that Americans skilled through alternative routes other than a bachelor’s degree represent 50 percent of the U.S. workforce. Many of them possess skills that should qualify them for jobs with salaries at least 50 percent higher than their current job.

In other words, our current hiring practices systematically underutilize the skills of millions of U.S. workers, deepening the economic divide between those with and without college degrees.

Keep reading in The Hill.

Gresser in Politico: Trump promised to rebalance trade in North America. The US trade deficit keeps climbing.

The former president’s campaign advisers say that if he returns to the White House in 2025, Trump would consider raising duties on all imports coming into the country, while slashing business taxes beyond the cuts he made in 2017 — steps he and his advisers argue will help rebuild U.S. manufacturing and create better-paying jobs at home. Some economists, however, predict the economic impact of those actions could offset each other, leaving the trade deficit largely unchanged.

Ed Gresser, an economist and former trade official in both Democratic and Republican administrations, said the main effect of Trump’s tax and trade plans for his second term would “be to lower living standards in the United States” by increasing the cost of goods for both businesses and consumers. “It would be significantly inflationary,” far more than the tariffs that Trump imposed during his first term on China and steel and aluminum products, he added.

…

The Commerce report shows the U.S. trade deficit with Mexico totaled a record $152 billion in 2023. And car imports continue to be a driving force behind that deficit, despite Trump’s emphasis on boosting U.S. auto production. The USMCA included a number of tough new provisions targeting the Mexican and Canadian auto sectors for just that purpose — for example, raising the amount of regional content included in a vehicle made in Canada and Mexico for it to qualify for the lower U.S. tariff rate. The Commerce report, however, shows the auto and auto parts trade deficit with Mexico hit $130 billion last year, compared to $83 billion in 2017.

Similarly, the overall trade deficit with Canada reached $68 billion in 2023, although that was down from $80 billion in 2022. The U.S. had a $19 billion deficit in passenger car trade with Canada but ran a small overall surplus in auto and auto parts trade with its northern neighbor.

The statistics illustrate how little Trump and his team understood the U.S. economy and how tax and trade policy work, said Gresser, who is now vice president for trade and global markets at the Progressive Policy Institute, a think tank closely aligned with centrist New Democrats.

“They didn’t understand what the trade deficit really meant and therefore they were not able to reduce it,” Gresser said, noting that other economic factors like how much a country invests and saves have a far larger influence on the size of the deficit than trade policy.

The big tax cut Congress passed during the Trump administration cut U.S. savings and boosted U.S. spending, pulling in more imports from abroad, Gresser said. Trump’s tariffs on more than $300 billion worth of Chinese goods “squeezed” the trade deficit with that country but caused it to swell with other countries, such as Mexico and Vietnam, he added.

…

U.S. auto sector employment has also grown under the USMCA, with help from additional government incentives provided by the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act, said Scott Paul, president of the Alliance for American Manufacturing, a union-affiliated group that supported Trump’s renegotiation of USMCA.

“We’ve seen more factory announcements for auto and major auto part production coming to the United States than at any time over the last couple of decades that NAFTA was in effect, and so that clearly is a positive development,” Paul said.

However, U.S. auto industry employment was also rising during the later years of NAFTA and the recent increase in the number of those jobs looks like a return to that upward trend following a sharp drop during the pandemic, Gresser said.

Read more in Politico.

Trade Fact of the Week: U.S. Geological Survey: 33,000 tons of gold out there under the hills

FACT: U.S. Geological Survey: 33,000 tons of gold out there under the hills.

THE NUMBERS: Quantity of gold “above ground” worldwide – 
2024: 212,582 tons*
2000: 144,000 tons?
1950:   70,000 tons?
1900:   30,000 tons?
1500:    ~5,000 – 15,000 tons?

* World Gold Council estimate.

WHAT THEY MEAN:

Previewing the betrayals, the shattered dreams, and the body count as The Treasure of the Sierra Madre opens, author B. Traven has some look-homeward-angel, be-content-with-what-you’ve-got advice:

“The treasure which you think not worth taking trouble and pains to find, this one alone is the real treasure you are longing for all your life.”

Still: The August U.S. Geological Survey reports last week in its 2024 Gold Commodity Summary that as much as 33,000 tons of gold is lying around under rocks and hills in the U.S. alone. (Including 3,000 tons of currently recoverable reserves, 12,000 tons of known but currently unrecoverable ore, and another 18,000 tons of undiscovered lodes.)  This in turn is “only a small portion” of total global reserves. With a price this week above $2,000 per ounce, the U.S. share alone would be worth about $2.2 trillion.

Should you quit your job and buy a shovel?

The sages of economics join Traven in loudly saying “No!” Here’s 18th-century econ. pioneer Adam Smith condemning speculators, amateur treasure-hunters, and professionals alike as “destined to bankruptcy and ruin,” in the appropriately titled Chapter 11 of The Wealth of Nations: 

“Of all those expensive and uncertain projects which bring bankruptcy upon the greater part of the people who engage in them, there is none perhaps more perfectly ruinous than the search after new gold and silver mines. … [W]hen any person undertakes to work a new mine in Peru, he is universally looked upon as a man destined to bankruptcy and ruin, and is upon that account shunned and avoided by everybody.”

From another tradition entirely, 14th-century Tunisian polymath ibn Khaldun scornfully rejects persistent rumors that sixth-century Byzantines, or alternatively djinns and wizards, had buried huge lots of gems and precious metals in caves.  He says the only ones who get rich on gold are con men swanning about the Maghreb selling phony maps and shares in non-existent mines. As to their dupes:

“Trying to make money from buried treasure is not a natural way to make a living.  Many weak-minded persons hope to discover riches under the earth and profit from them … Their motive is their inability to earn money normally, through commerce, farming or crafts.  They trust instead that they can grow rich without effort or trouble.”

In practice, ibn Kh. may have been basically right about get-rich-quick dreamers, but Smith was off-base on professional mining. The World Gold Council (a trade association of 32 of the world’s big gold-mining companies) reports 4,899 tons of gold ‘used’ in 2023, the largest annual total they have on record. About two-fifths of this, 2,168 tons, went to jewelers; investors bought about the same amount, with 1,040 tons going to central banks and 1,190 to private buyers. The rest divides between 298 tons to tech businesses for semiconductor wire bonding, infrared sensors, thermal protection for aerospace technologies, photovoltaics and solar cells, reflective satellite mirrors, etc.; 40 tons or so to dentists, and the rest to miscellaneous buyers. The WGC says that 1,800 of the 4,899 tons came from recycling, and the other 3,100 tons from mines.

Therefore, Smith is incorrect and lots of professionals make money digging up gold. The Council’s figures imply that a third of all currently circulating gold has been dug up since 2000, and the total — “about 212,852 tonnes” by their count — rises about 1% each year.  Production is pretty diffuse by country: the Council and the USGS disagree slightly on totals, but concur that four countries produce more than 200 tons a year (China, Australia, Russia, and Canada), and another 10 or so are above 100 tons:  the U.S. at 170 tons (124 tons from Nevada, 20 from Alaska), joined by Burkina Faso, Ghana, Indonesia, Mali, Mexico, South Africa, and Uzbekistan.  USGS has the Peruvian mines Smith scoffed at 250 years ago producing 90 tons a year.  Gold trade comes to about $450 billion per year — not far behind the WTO’s figure of about $625 billion in iron and steel exports, and about 2% of world goods trade — as metal flows through the London Bullion Market, the slightly smaller New York, Zurich, and Tokyo exchanges, Swiss metal refineries and financial institutions, Indian and Hong Kong investor portfolios and so forth. Switzerland is the largest trader, often both importing and exporting $90 billion worth in a year.

Could you, realistically, get a bit of this? Well, there’s still lots more gold beneath the ground than above it. World “reserves” in the technical sense of “recoverable without loss under current technology and mining and other costs” are 3,000 tons in the U.S. and 59,000 tons worldwide; adding in veins and lodes too expensive to get at, and extrapolating the USGS’ figure for currently unrecoverable and unknown lodes in the U.S. to the world suggests a world total above half a million tons.

But even the ore everybody knows about is hard and expensive to dig up. As an extreme but illustrative example, the Mponeng mine near Johannesburg is a hole 4 kilometers deep. The World Gold Council puts the current AISC (“All-In Sustaining Cost,” the average cost of digging up an ounce of gold) at $1,276. This allows substantial profits given a $2,076/oz. market price, but you’d need lots of capital to keep going, as well as very high up-front capital for opening a mine. So even if you could find one of USGS’ 33,000 tons, it might not pay to try for it.

Still, even Traven is equivocal. If his first sentence tells you that you’ll regret trying, his second wistfully suggests that you might want to make one last try:

“The glittering treasure you are hunting for day and night lies buried on the other side of that hill yonder.” 

FURTHER READING

Data:

The U.S. Geological Survey’s 2024 gold report.

The U.S. Geological Survey has U.S. production, world production, trade, and price data for gold and eight-three other minerals — everything from platinum-group metals and gemstones through iron and tin and on to salt, gravel, and peat — from the early 20th century to 2023.

All the gold in the world: 

USGS says there are 59,000 tons of currently recoverable gold “reserves” worldwide underground, including the 3,000 tons in the U.S. Gold being resistant to tarnish, it stays around, except for the fraction hidden in booby-trapped tombs, buried in pirate chests, or dropped down manholes. The World Gold Council helpfully illustrates their “around 212,852 tonnes” estimate with a picture of a 212,000-ton solid gold cube 73 feet on each side. It would be worth about $15.5 trillion.  One ton of gold would be a cube with sides about 15″ long.

A counterpoint, attempting to estimate the total gold available to kings, sultans, pirates, merchants, &c. from 1492 to the present, guesses pre-1900 stocks were quite low.

The Swiss news service looks at Switzerland’s gold vortex, human rights compliance, money laundering, and policy.

And the Mponeng mine, deepest in the world.

Nothing new under the sun:

Ibn Khaldun’s Muqaddimah.

Smith’s Wealth of Nations.

Ibn Khaldun’s con men have modern descendants: the Nevada Mining Commission warns a gullible public to steer clear of get-rich-quick schemes and “dirt pile swindles.”

And last:

If you must — The U.S. Geological Survey has advice on where to go to find gold, and how to do it.

But be warned — B. Traven’s Treasure of the Sierra Madre.

ABOUT ED

Ed Gresser is Vice President and Director for Trade and Global Markets at PPI.

Ed returns to PPI after working for the think tank from 2001-2011. He most recently served as the Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Trade Policy and Economics at the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). In this position, he led USTR’s economic research unit from 2015-2021, and chaired the 21-agency Trade Policy Staff Committee.

Ed began his career on Capitol Hill before serving USTR as Policy Advisor to USTR Charlene Barshefsky from 1998 to 2001. He then led PPI’s Trade and Global Markets Project from 2001 to 2011. After PPI, he co-founded and directed the independent think tank ProgressiveEconomy until rejoining USTR in 2015. In 2013, the Washington International Trade Association presented him with its Lighthouse Award, awarded annually to an individual or group for significant contributions to trade policy.

Ed is the author of Freedom from Want: American Liberalism and the Global Economy (2007). He has published in a variety of journals and newspapers, and his research has been cited by leading academics and international organizations including the WTO, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund. He is a graduate of Stanford University and holds a Master’s Degree in International Affairs from Columbia Universities and a certificate from the Averell Harriman Institute for Advanced Study of the Soviet Union.

Read the full email and sign up for the Trade Fact of the Week.