PPI Urges Court to Reject Live Nation-Ticketmaster Settlement, Calls for Structural Breakup

WASHINGTON (September 3, 2026) — Today, the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) submitted comments urging the federal court overseeing the U.S., et al. v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and Ticketmaster L.L.C. monopolization case to reject the proposed settlement between the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Live Nation-Ticketmaster.

PPI’s comments, filed under the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, or “Tunney Act,” ask the court to instead require a structural breakup of the live events giant to restore competition in primary ticketing services. PPI argues the proposed final judgment suffers from two fatal flaws.

One, it is the product of political interference. And two, its “behavioral” remedies, including a contract compliance regime and an Open Distribution and Ticket Authentication system, do nothing to reduce Live Nation-Ticketmaster’s incentive and ability to exercise monopoly power in the market for primary ticketing services.

PPI’s comments explain that Live Nation-Ticketmaster has a long history of violating past behavioral remedies, and warns the new conditions are too complex, opaque, and easy to circumvent for courts and enforcers to police effectively.

“Behavioral remedies haven’t worked before, and there’s no reason to believe more of the same will work now,” said Diana Moss, Vice President and Director of Competition Policy at PPI. “The only remedy that truly restores competition is a structural one: break Ticketmaster off from Live Nation, then break it up.”

PPI’s comments emphasize that the DOJ originally sought a structural break-up remedy in its original complaint. PPI argues that “enough is enough.” U.S. consumers spend roughly $20 billion each year on live concert tickets, with inflated monopoly ticket fees driving up that cost. A weak remedy would allow Live Nation-Ticketmaster to continue to squeeze independent venues, ice out competition from primary ticketing rivals, and drive up ticket fees for consumers.

Read PPI’s full comments here.

Founded in 1989, PPI is a catalyst for policy innovation and political reform based in Washington, D.C. Its mission is to create radically pragmatic ideas for moving America beyond ideological and partisan deadlock. Find an expert and learn more about PPI by visiting progressivepolicy.org. Follow us at @ppi.

###

Media Contact: Ian O’Keefe – iokeefe@ppionline.org

Manno for Fordham Institute: Don’t just defend or destroy the National Center for Education Statistics. Rebuild it.

In early 2025, the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) was largely dismantled. The Trump administration, acting through the Elon Musk–led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), cut NCES’s federal staff from 103 employees to three, removed its commissioner, and canceled roughly three-quarters of its contracts. This disrupted or halted much of its important statistical work. That is a problem that must be remedied. The question is how. A new report from the American Statistical Association (ASA) argues that the answer is not to recreate what was dismantled, but to build a new and better agency.

Written by Shelly Wilkie Martinez and Stephen Provasnik, A Vision and Strategy for Remaking the National Center for Education Statistics is a starting point. And to that end, the ASA is seeking public feedback as it moves into a second phase, expected to commence in 2027, that will refine the vision and develop a fuller roadmap for rebuilding NCES.

The report begins from two propositions that are sometimes—mistakenly—treated as contradictory.

Read more in Fordham Institute

Gresser in the Financial Post: Which states stand to suffer most in escalated U.S.-Canada trade war?

[…]

“Michigan would probably be the single state hit hardest because the auto industry is so important to them economically and psychologically,” said Ed Gresser, vice president at the U.S.-based Progressive Policy Institute think tank. “And Michigan is probably the state most deeply integrated with Canada.”

[…]

Gresser said the impact of counter-tariffs could be more profound on smaller states like Iowa, which exports nearly US$2.5 billion in farm and construction equipment every year and sends 38 per cent of that to Canada.

“Smaller states are often more specialized,” Gresser said. “When something goes wrong for a particular company in a small state, it has real emotional reverberations … if it’s in California or Texas, it may be more like a particular city or a particular region (that is affected).”

[…]

Read more in the Financial Post

New World screwworms arrived in Texas this summer, for the first time since 1976

New World screwworms arrived in Texas this summer, for the first time since 1976

THE NUMBERS: U.S. invasive-species agency staffing, in FTEs* –

      FY2025       FY2026         FY2027 request
National Marine Fisheries Service 3,089 2,441 1,806
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 8,462 8,189 8,129
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 8,759 7,784 5,861
U.S. Geological Service 7,718 6,696 4,736
National Park Service 18,541 16,039 13,598

* “Full-time equivalent employees,” the standard measure of agency staffing. Data from agency budget justifications; links below.

WHAT THEY MEAN: 

Since the early-June sighting of a New World screwworm in Zavala, TX — America’s first since 1976 — the bugs have turned up in 16 Texas counties and one New Mexico site. A gross but to-the-point look at this unpleasant insect, from the Centers for Disease Control:

“The New World screwworm (NWS), or Cochliomyia hominivorax, is species of parasitic fly that completes part of its lifecycle by feeding on the tissue or flesh of warm-blooded animals and people. NWS flies are attracted to wounds and body openings like the nose, eyes, ears, and mouth, where they lay eggs. The eggs hatch into maggots (larvae) that eat live tissue, causing a worsening, often painful, and foul-smelling wound.  NWS is typically found in South America and parts of the Caribbean. However, the fly has steadily moved northward from South America through every country in Central America, Mexico, and the United States since 2023.”

Pulling back a bit: If they’re now endemic to the U.S., screwworms would be one among 6,500 “invasive species” resident in North America — that is, animals, plants, fungi, microorganisms, etc., arriving in the continent since European settlement in the 1500s. (The native-species count is about 250,000.) Some invaders — say, feral horses — are benign; some, like indoor centipedes, are harmless even though creepy and annoying. Others, like the Burmese pythons in Florida’s wetlands or Asiatic and European earthworms in the Minnesota woods, pose risk to habitat and native wildlife. And a few, like the zebra mussel in the Great Lakes and the screwworm, threaten the economy, public health, or both.

What can be done about them? Some useful international agreements help stop new ones from getting here. As an example, the 2017 International Ballast Convention requires commercial vessels to ditch ballast water in mid-ocean to prevent transcontinental movements of shallow-water clams, shrimp, mussels, seaweed, and fish.

Extirpating invaders after arrival is much harder. Referring to the tens or even hundreds of thousands of Florida pythons, the U.S. Geological Survey sadly concedes that “the odds of eradicating an introduced population of reptiles once it has spread across a large area are very low.” But “very low’ isn’t the same as “impossible” — the New World screwworm itself, in fact, was once a success story, eliminated from the U.S. in 1966 by the release of sterilized male flies in infested zones. And even if eradication is impossible, “containment” is a lot better than “uncontrolled spread.”

All three options — prevention, eradication, containment — require investment in science and human talent in the field. That’s been the job of a battery of high-performance U.S. scientific agencies — the USGS and the Fish and Wildlife Service on remote lands and waterways; the National Marine Fisheries Service in seaports and coastal waters; the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service at airports and border crossing-points; the National Park Service — who do their best to stop invaders at the border, identify new populations, and slow them down once they’ve arrived.

Disinvestment in science and human talent — the trend of the last two years — means more invaders will get through, fewer new populations will be caught early, and new arrivals will do more harm. The Trump administration’s ill-starred “DOGE” experiment last year cut the combined APHIS, NMFS, USGS, and FWS staff by nearly 5000 (from a base just above 28,000), with an especially high toll on young talent. This year’s parent-agency budgets envision cutting 3,360 more positions. The larger National Park Service is down about 2,000 (from 18,000), and the administration hopes to scrap 2,920 more. Local-level impact ranges from scaled-back inspection of incoming cargo at Los Angeles ports and the proposed cancellation of a planned Illinois barrier against Asian carp entry to Lake Michigan, to closure of a Flathead Valley (Montana) U.S. Geological Survey research program on zebra mussels.

Altogether, the U.S. government has diminished scientific capacity, fewer scientists, and less investment in inspection and infrastructure than it had in the summer of 2024. Budgeting proposals suggest continued DOGE-like staff cuts and general bias against the “discretionary spending” budgets scientific agencies need to fulfil their missions and recruit young talent. Against this backdrop, this summer’s Texas screwworms (like, in similar contexts, Pennsylvania’s measles-associated deaths and the spring’s lettuce-borne Cyclospora outbreak) seem less “an unfortunate specific incident” and more “a sign of what’s to come.”

FURTHER READING

Policy overview:

U.S. government invasive species gateway.

Doing their best in adversity: Invasive species policy summaries from the U.S. Geological Survey, the Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Marine Fisheries ServiceNational Park Service, and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.

The International Maritime Bureau explains the International Ballast Convention.

Screwworms:

From APHIS, a description of the fly & the larval worm.

Via CDC, a map of New World screwworm “infested zones” in Texas.

New Mexico’s Department of Agriculture hopes to stop the spread.

Agency staffing:

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service: FY2025 and FY2027 budget justifications. This year’s requests is down by 60 staff. (More technically, per typical budget usage, 45 “FTE,” full-time equivalent employees.)

National Marine Fisheries Service: FY2025 and FY2027 budget justifications. The 2027 request is down 635 FTEs.

Fish and Wildlife Service: FY2025 and FY2027 budget justifications, with 484 fewer proposed FTEs.

U.S. Geological Service: FY2025 and FY2027 budget justifications, with 1,960 fewer proposed FTEs.

National Park Service: Budget justifications from FY2010 forward, with a proposed 1,441-FTE cut.

Budget big picture:

U.S. fiscal problems originate in aging, tax policy, health insurance, and interest payments. Less “discretionary” spending cannot solve them. In the specific case of science and medicine, disinvestment in vaccination, food safety, and invasive species control typically brings the opposite fiscal-policy result: tiny savings, then larger remediation bills later on. PPI’s 30-year model budget (2024) explains the looming fiscal crisis and the right way to meet it.

And some more invaders:

Earthworms: The suburban gardener loves to see him/her*; the northern forestry manager reacts with consternation and fear. All earthworms north of the Mason-Dixon line are invaders — the last Ice Age froze off all the locals — and in the woods they’re not benign. From the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources:

“All of the terrestrial earthworms in Minnesota are non-native, invasive species from Europe and Asia.  …  Minnesota’s hardwood forests developed in the absence of earthworms. Without worms, fallen leaves decompose slowly, creating a spongy layer of organic ‘duff’. This duff layer is the natural growing environment for native woodland wildflowers. It also provides habitat for ground-dwelling animals and helps prevent soil erosion. Invading earthworms eat the leaves that create the duff layer and are capable of eliminating it completely. Big trees survive, but many young seedlings perish, along with many ferns and wildflowers.”

The 15 worm species in eastern Canada, New England, New York, and the Midwest, mostly descendants of European worms brought in after the Mayflower landing, are chewing their way through the duff layers of the north woods at about 50 feet per year. The newest, the “Asian jumping worm” (a Korean/Japanese native, present on the West Coast since the 19th century), first turned up in Minnesota in 2006 and reached Wisconsin in 2013. Earthworm basics and advice from Minnesota’s Forestry and Wildlife Extension Service.

* Him/her is the correct pronoun; earthworms are naturally hermaphroditic.

Islands: In Hawaii, 282 of 1100 native species are threatened or endangered.  Hawaii’s Invasive Species Council.

Lakes: Michigan’s Asian carp planning council tries to keep the carp out of the Great Lakes.

Spiders: The University of Georgia tentatively concludes that Joro spiders — very large web-weavers, native to Japan, present in Georgia since 2014 — are proving compatible with local arachnids and insects.

ABOUT ED

Ed Gresser is Vice President and Director for Trade and Global Markets at PPI.

Ed returns to PPI after working for the think tank from 2001-2011. He most recently served as the Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Trade Policy and Economics at the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). In this position, he led USTR’s economic research unit from 2015-2021, and chaired the 21-agency Trade Policy Staff Committee.

Ed began his career on Capitol Hill before serving USTR as Policy Advisor to USTR Charlene Barshefsky from 1998 to 2001. He then led PPI’s Trade and Global Markets Project from 2001 to 2011. After PPI, he co-founded and directed the independent think tank ProgressiveEconomy until rejoining USTR in 2015. In 2013, the Washington International Trade Association presented him with its Lighthouse Award, awarded annually to an individual or group for significant contributions to trade policy.

Ed is the author of Freedom from Want: American Liberalism and the Global Economy (2007). He has published in a variety of journals and newspapers, and his research has been cited by leading academics and international organizations including the WTO, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund. He is a graduate of Stanford University and holds a Master’s Degree in International Affairs from Columbia Universities and a certificate from the Averell Harriman Institute for Advanced Study of the Soviet Union.

Read the full email and sign up for the Trade Fact of the Week.

Jacoby for Washington Monthly: The New Normal in Kyiv, Ukraine

Thursday, August 27, was the first day of the new normal, but it didn’t yet feel normal to any of us in Kyiv.

I counted 11 air raid alerts between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. Each time, the sirens in my quiet residential neighborhood would tear through the air—an ear-splitting wail, impossible to ignore even after nearly five years of war. The next sound was often machine-gun fire—Ukrainian air defenses downing incoming drones and missiles—or, in other cases, a great booming thud as enemy munitions exploded not far away.

Sometimes it was several hours before the all-clear signal; in other instances, just a few minutes. But by Thursday’s end, the shocks had added up—I was a wreck, hardly able to concentrate. The Ukrainian Air Force reported that Moscow had launched 140 attack drones that day.

Ukrainians are no longer surprised by nighttime air alerts. That’s been normal since 2022, albeit growing worse every year, with the number of incoming drones and missiles sometimes swelling to 700 in a single night. They’re also used to Iranian-made Shahed attack drones and the better-engineered Russian version known as Gerans. The Ukrainian military has developed highly effective layered defenses—electronic jamming, jet fighters, traditional anti-aircraft guns, truck-mounted machine guns, and a new generation of innovative drone interceptors—that can shoot down up to 90 percent of these slow-flying triangular platforms, generally just over 10 feet long with an eight-foot wingspan.

Read more in Washington Monthly

Manno for Daita K12: The College Guide K-12 Leaders Should Read

Researchers at Northwestern University recently tested what happens when students in different zip codes search Google for “colleges.” They found that students from lower-income areas are systematically shown colleges with poorer outcomes, Samantha Powers wrote in Washington Monthly’s 2026 College Guide and Rankings.

These include lower graduation rates, higher loan-default rates, and weaker earnings outcomes. They do that even when those students would have qualified for, and often paid less at, more selective schools. Affluent students, by contrast, were up to three times more likely to see results from colleges with strong track records. That gap between lower- and higher-income students held whether researchers looked at ordinary search results or Google’s newer AI-generated summaries.

This raises a question. Who fills the gap when a school doesn’t have the staff to guide students through the search themselves? The same research points to what actually closes that gap. It’s a real conversation with a counselor.

Read more in Datia K12

PPI Commends House Subcommittee Advancement of Bipartisan Satellite Streamlining Bill to Help U.S. Win Modern Space Race

WASHINGTON (September 1, 2026) — Today, Mary Guenther, Head of Space Policy at the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI), issued the following statement regarding H.R. 8255, the Satellite and Telecommunications Streamlining Act, unanimously advancing out of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology:

“PPI commends the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology for unanimously advancing the Satellite and Telecommunications Streamlining Act, which will make satellite licensing more efficient and predictable to enable a globally competitive space sector.

“As PPI has noted, the United States is in a strategic power competition with China, and space is a critical front. Losing the upper hand in the ultimate high ground will make Americans less safe, less prosperous, and less able to reap the terrestrial benefits of space, as preserving American leadership in space is vital to the country’s economic and national security.

“Space may be far, far away, but the impacts of satellite systems are usually felt here on Earth. Just to name a few examples, satellites help communities newly able to access high-speed broadband from low-Earth orbit, enable first responders to detect and quickly respond to wildfires using satellite imagery, and provide GPS information that helps people get where they need to go in unfamiliar areas. This legislation will encourage future innovations in satellite applications to continue to improve the lives of everyday Americans.

“The Satellite and Telecommunications Streamlining Act would help keep the U.S. regulatory system streamlined to keep the domestic space economy ahead of geopolitical adversaries and continue to improve the lives of everyday Americans.”

Founded in 1989, PPI is a catalyst for policy innovation and political reform based in Washington, D.C. Its mission is to create radically pragmatic ideas for moving America beyond ideological and partisan deadlock. Find an expert and learn more about PPI by visiting progressivepolicy.org. Follow us at @ppi.

###

Media Contact: Ian O’Keefe – iokeefe@ppionline.org

Gresser on Times of London Radio: US-Canada Trade War: American Consumers ‘Unsettled’

“Most Americans like Canada, they think Canada is a good trading partner.”

There has been very little controversy concerning the US trading relationship in the past, leaving American consumers “surprised” at the severity of the current trade war, says former Assistant US Trade Representative Ed Gresser.

Ed Gresser was speaking to John Pienaar on Times Radio Drive.

Watch the full interview.

Manno for Governing Magazine: Workforce Pell: A Governance Test Most States Aren’t Ready for

For decades, the federal Pell Grant program has helped low-income students pay for college-credit programs that lasted at least 15 weeks. This shut out short-term technical and vocational training. The new federal Workforce Pell program breaks that barrier and allows funding for programs as brief as eight weeks.

This program also gives states the frontline responsibility for deciding which short-term programs are eligible for federal money. This means that, among other things, states must build the data systems needed to meet the U.S. Department of Education’s 2028-29 deadline for reporting job placement outcomes by occupation.

Tracking those outcomes is not fundamentally an education problem; it’s a governance problem. And many states lack the governance infrastructure to know which programs actually work. This infrastructure includes the unglamorous machinery of not only data systems but also agency coordination and credential recognition that determines whether public money produces real results.

Read more in Governing Magazine

Kahlenberg and Lin in The Daily Cavalier: U.Va. Humanities scholars push back on national report alleging politicized scholarship

[…]

Like Field, Sandhya Shukla, professor of English and chair of American Studies, remarked in a statement to The Cavalier Daily not just on the report’s conclusion about the fields she studies, but also on how the conclusions were reached. The report’s discussion of American Studies is based on a paper by Richard Kahlenberg and Lief Lin, who argue that American Quarterly — the leading journal of American Studies — promotes a politically biased worldview for a discussion of American Studies that Shukla wrote is everchanging.

“A coding of journal articles in terms of positive or negative portrayals of America illuminates very little about a complex and changing interdisciplinary project that is much more interested in ‘how’ nation has been imagined and lived, than the ‘what’ of any stance like exceptionalism,” Shukla wrote. “That’s a problem of method and theory.”

Shukla also argued that Kahlenberg and Lin’s statement for American Studies to teach an “honest and hopeful account of American History” itself is an ideological demand.

“They are really arguing for an ideological agenda, for an academic field, in a strange echo of what they and other critics of ‘liberal’ or ‘left-wing’ humanities decry,” Shukla wrote.

[…]

Read more in The Daily Cavalier

Soaring Costs and Grid Strain Put Maryland’s Climate Goals in Doubt

WASHINGTON (August 27, 2026) — A new report from the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) finds that Maryland has built one of the country’s most energy-efficient, lowest-emitting economies, but warns that the state’s sweeping climate agenda is increasingly out of step with soaring electricity prices, shrinking federal support, and a widening capacity gap on the regional grid.

Authored by Neel Brown, Managing Director at PPI, and John Kemp, an internationally recognized energy markets expert, “Maryland’s Climate Goals Facing a New Reality” examines the state’s path toward the targets set under its 2022 Climate Solutions Now Act, including a 60% cut in greenhouse gas emissions below 2006 levels by 2031 and net-zero emissions by 2045.

Maryland’s energy-related emissions per person are the lowest of any state, just 55% of the national average, thanks to a power mix dominated by zero-emission nuclear and lower-emission gas that has largely displaced coal. Total emissions have fallen more than twice as fast as the national rate since 2005. But like other states inside the PJM Interconnection, Maryland is now being squeezed by explosive data center growth in Northern Virginia, which is driving up regional wholesale power costs. Residential electricity prices climbed at an average annual rate of 2.4% between 2019 and 2024, nearly two-and-a-half times the national rate, and PJM wholesale prices jumped 47% in 2025 alone.

“Maryland has proven that a state can cut emissions faster than the rest of the country while keeping electricity bills manageable,” said Brown. “But the easy wins from switching off coal are behind it. Lawmakers should prioritize the programs that deliver real emissions reductions, protect the grid, and keep costs in check for ratepayers, rather than mandating an outcome the state’s own numbers say isn’t achievable on this timeline.”

The report notes that Maryland’s climate plan spans 21 separate initiatives, from EV charging expansion to farmland conservation to building electrification, at an estimated combined cost of $1 billion a year. That price tag is complicated by federal funding cuts under the Trump administration, which have put much of the financing Maryland officials were counting on in doubt. A January 2026 analysis from the University of Maryland’s Center for Global Sustainability projects the state will reach only a 42% emissions cut by 2031, far short of the 60% statutory goal.

Polling shows broad public support for expanding natural gas and nuclear generation to meet rising demand, while local measures such as Montgomery County’s push to ban natural gas appliances face strong public opposition. To keep the grid stable, Maryland has already had to delay retirement of its last coal-fired plant, Brandon Shores, from 2025 to 2029, and fast-track two new natural gas units in Harford County.

To keep the state’s climate strategy on solid footing, the authors make three key recommendations:

  1. Rank the state’s 21 climate initiatives by cost-effectiveness rather than pursuing all of them at once, and focus funding on the programs that cut the most emissions per dollar spent.
  2. Preserve firm baseload generation, including nuclear and natural gas, rather than retiring capacity ahead of proven, reliable sources of energy.
  3. Replace blanket mandates, such as natural gas appliance bans, with targeted, means-tested incentives that protect low- and middle-income ratepayers.

The authors conclude that Maryland can remain a national climate leader without sacrificing the affordability and reliability gains that have made it a model for other states, but only by anchoring its strategy in today’s cost and capacity realities rather than a deadline set before the current price pressures emerged.

Read and download the report here.

Founded in 1989, PPI is a catalyst for policy innovation and political reform based in Washington, D.C. Its mission is to create radically pragmatic ideas for moving America beyond ideological and partisan deadlock. Find an expert and learn more about PPI by visiting progressivepolicy.org. Follow us at @ppi.

###

Media Contact: Ian O’Keefe – iokeefe@ppionline.org

Another Month in RFK Jr.’s Vaccine Conspiracy Theories

This time last year, Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was signaling his plan to dismantle America’s mechanisms around vaccine safety and access. While there were still traces of hope that Congress would provide actual oversight over Kennedy, these efforts have so far turned out to be more performative than authoritative. Congress needs to step up and use its constitutional authority to provide adequate oversight before Trump and Kennedy push the U.S. further into a wholly preventable public health crisis. 

Luckily, the courts have paused the worst of Kennedy’s actions. The courts halted a revamped childhood vaccine schedule Kennedy pushed through in the shadows as well as his attempt to stack a crucial advisory panel with vaccine skeptics. Even as they are repeatedly told their actions are illegal, Kennedy and Trump continue to push forward their conspiracy theories and anti-vax agenda. 

Despite data showing a once unthinkable measles outbreak continues to expand, Trump, with Kennedy’s direct support, issued a new executive order (EO) earlier this month. The EO creates confusion for families, providers, and communities by changing how and for whom certain vaccines are recommended. More than anything, this new action shows how little the men leading public health in this country actually know about these topics. With this anti-science EO, Trump and Kennedy are causing more harm than good by providing parents with a message that diverges from what pediatricians are saying.

At the press conference announcing the new executive order, the president reiterated one of his favorite fabrications: the MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella) vaccine is safer when split into three separate shots. Here’s the thing, though — U.S. pharmaceutical companies don’t manufacture, and there is no FDA approval for three separate vaccines. It is functionally impossible to separate these vaccines right now. So why would the president throw this idea out? Besides ignorance, it is a tactic to create confusion for parents and complicate adherence to the vaccine schedule. By unnecessarily separating these vaccines, people will be less likely to complete all the steps. 

One rationale for the new executive order was that they “only” moved some of the vaccines to the shared clinical decision-making designation, not removing vaccine recommendations completely. The president and secretary justify this by claiming this allows providers and parents to have a conversation about the vaccines, not to deter them. This shows, again, a lack of understanding of these systems. 

The vaccine schedule does not demand — or even recommend — a child be given a vaccine without a discussion with the parents. Shared clinical decision-making is intended for care decisions where the medical evidence is not clear, and there are multiple treatment options. Vaccines, especially Kennedy’s claim that they are tied to autism, have decades of research and evidence. Autonomy in health care is necessary, and the recommended vaccine schedule had provided autonomy well before Kennedy started changing it. 

These misinformed decisions are not just symbolic; they are already changing individual vaccination decisions throughout the U.S. Data for the 2025-2026 school year shows a new record high of vaccine exemptions for school-aged children. The majority of counties in the US do not achieve herd immunity in kindergarten classrooms. Meaning the community level of immunity to minimize the spread of an infectious disease has not been reached, leaving those who are unable to be vaccinated for a variety of reasons unprotected. Trump and Kennedy’s anti-vax agenda creates nothing but confusion and is tied to this dangerous collapse in vaccination rates. 

Kennedy and Trump’s policies are being evaluated currently by the committee that monitors the US’s measles eradication status by reviewing the CDC’s annual report on measles. Although a decision will not be made until November, the US is in the midst of the worst outbreak of measles in decades and is unlikely to retain the status of measles elimination. The loss of this status may sound like an administrative designation, but it indicates a larger problem of potential societal and economic harms. For example, one case could have a societal cost (e.g., loss of productivity, cost of care) of $47,000, not to mention the potential confusion for places such as childcare centers when an outbreak occurs. We have solutions to prevent these harms, but Kennedy is choosing not to use them.

To end last week, Kennedy published a Request for Information (RFI) to gather feedback about the categories used on the childhood vaccine schedule. This move appears to exclude the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the scientific experts of the CDC by accepting the changes from the executive order as finalized. In addition, by using an RFI, as opposed to a proposed rule, HHS is not required to respond to individual responses or concerns submitted. So this is merely a mirage of gathering public feedback.    

The biggest fault of vaccines is that they are a victim of their own success. Many people do not fear polio, measles, or other vaccine-eradicated diseases because they have not seen the harm firsthand. Most people do not know someone who spent their life in an iron lung after contracting polio, the long-term brain damage caused by measles, or a child with advanced liver damage due to hepatitis B. 

However, using herd immunity to protect the community against infectious disease is a long-held American idea that dates back to George Washington’s command of the Continental Army. Giving up on it now is not only deeply un-American, but it is also an abdication of duty by the president and HHS secretary to promote the general welfare of this country. Congress needs to be a check on the executive branch by holding oversight hearings to better understand how these vaccine decisions are being made and pass the Family Vaccine Protection Act. Americans deserve to be provided with sound, evidence-based health recommendations from their government.

Manno for Daita K12: What Gen Z Teens Are Telling Us About Readiness for What Comes After High School

The latest installment of the Walton Family Foundation-Gallup Voices of Gen Z study, released in late August, offers school and district leaders a useful gut check. Surveying 1,758 Gen Z students still enrolled in middle or high school, the report finds what many educators already sense.

Young people are generally optimistic about their futures, but far less confident they are prepared for it. The gap between hope and readiness isn’t evenly distributed. Closing it may depend less on sweeping reform than on a handful of practices already within reach of most schools.

Read more in Datia K12

Maryland’s Climate Goals Facing a New Reality

Maryland has established some of the most aggressive and ambitious climate goals of any state in the US. Under its 2022 Climate Solutions Now Act, it aims to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 60% below 2006 levels by 2031 and reach net-zero by 2045.

In addition to these ambitions, policymakers must now contend with spiking electricity demand and some of the country’s highest energy prices. Ratepayers have seen increases at an average annual rate of 2.4% between 2019 and 2024, two-and-a-half times the average national rate of 0.9% after adjusting for inflation. This dramatically complicates the prospect of quickly achieving net-zero while keeping electricity reliable and affordable for Marylanders.

Read the full report

 

Ritz for Forbes: Trump Administration Struggles To Finance Unsustainable Fiscal Policy

Government bond yields recently spiked to their highest level since 2007, just as the gross U.S. national debt passed the symbolic milestone of $40 trillion. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent moved quickly to project a sense that the Trump administration had a plan to contain long-term borrowing costs. But at best, these moves will merely delay the inevitable challenges of financing the administration’s unsustainable tax and spending policies.

There are several reasons for the recent yield spike. Bond yields are driven by supply and demand: as more entities seek to borrow more money, they must offer higher interest rates to attract investors. Since the day Trump began his second term, the federal government has spent $3.8 trillion more than it raised in revenue, all of which had to be financed with borrowing. Foreign governments with fiscal imbalances of their own are also competing for this capital, as is the private sector, particularly tech companies seeking to finance a rapid build-out of infrastructure for artificial intelligence.

These higher borrowing costs are coming at a time when the federal government was already projected to spend nearly $1 trillion just paying interest on the national debt this year — almost $3,000 per American citizen. Higher yields also increase mortgage interest rates and other consumer borrowing costs at a time when cost-of-living concerns are at the top of voters’ concerns.

Bessent attempted to tame these costs by pledging to increase government repurchases of bonds. By reducing the total outstanding supply of government debt, the Treasury would reduce the yield it needs to pay to get enough investors to buy new debt at auctions. Bessent suggested he would finance the repurchases through two mechanisms: spending down the government’s cash on hand, and issuing shorter-term debt that generally comes with a lower interest rate than 10-year bonds.

Bessent’s moves may reduce interest costs in the short term, but they are no substitute for the underlying problem of unsustainable deficits. Eventually new bonds will need to be issued to cover new obligations and replace the bonds repurchased by the Treasury.

Read more in Forbes

Canter for Merion West: When Education Reform Loses Touch With Reality

For the past twenty years, I have spent a lot of time thinking about—and advocating for—accountability in public education. I wrote about some of that experience in my recent paper, Inside the Mississippi Marathon, in which I chronicle Mississippi’s twenty-year climb from worst to first, when adjusting for demographics, in reading and math outcomes. Education advocates like me frequently talk about what adults in schools and positions of leadership should be doing (or not doing), and how we should hold them accountable for it. We rarely talk about what accountability means for most of the people generating education policy ideas.

Now that I have joined the ranks of national education reformers, I am thinking more and more about that question.

I have strong feelings about the responsibilities of policy wonks for good reason. Years ago, I was working on a major piece of education legislation in Mississippi, one of the many I worked on over the course of my career. A person from a national organization came down from Washington, D.C.—we will call this person “The Snob”—and met with several policymakers about the bill. I do not recall exactly how I came to be in this particular private meeting between The Snob and Mississippi Senate Education Chair Gray Tollison, but I do recall that it was not quite clear to me why The Snob had come down. She did not represent any constituency that was critical to the passage of the bill, nor did she have the standing in Mississippi to matter too much one way or another. And though she was on our side of the debate, we also did not need any more “experts” from D.C. I had already mastered the ins and outs of the legislation after spending years reading all the credible research and talking to other specialists and practitioners.

All of this would have been news to The Snob, though, who clearly felt her opinions were of the utmost importance. The meeting went off the rails almost immediately after finishing the usual niceties. “I totally disagree,” The Snob emphatically declared when we explained why one section of the bill did not exactly match the theoretical ideal that she believed in. We tried, very diplomatically, to explain again that this was an aspect of the bill that had been a source of enormous trouble and that it had taken significant work to find a solution palatable to everyone involved. “Well, I get to say whatever I want because I’m not from here,” she sniffed. “I can go back to D.C.”

It was a shocking thing to say, especially with the tone she took. Had she shared either her critique of that portion of the bill or her belief that she could bear no consequences for her words either in public or to any other Mississippi legislator than the one sitting beside me, I likely would have had to spend the next month trying to salvage the bill from the jaws of death for the umpteenth time. It took everything in me not to yell at her from across the table. The best I could do was shoot her a Julia Sugarbaker-worthy death glare.

Read more in Merion West