What’s Next for the Charter School Movement? feat. Starlee Coleman

On this episode of RAS Reports, PPI’s Reinventing America’s Schools Project Co-Director Tressa Pankovits sits down for a conversation with Starlee Coleman, the new President and CEO of the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. The pair discuss the future of the charter school movement in the wake of the election, as well as Coleman’s priorities for the organization now that she’s taken over as CEO.

Manno for Discourse Magazine: Creating More Earn-and-Learn Apprenticeships

As the public sours on the value of a college degree as the default pathway to success, it’s sweetening on the value of multiple pathways to success, especially earn-and-learn models such as apprenticeships. Apprenticeships are the new learning campuses, where paid work and education combine to jump-start careers.

Vice President Kamala Harris captured this sentiment during her 2024 presidential campaign: “For far too long, our nation has encouraged only one path to success: a four-year college degree. Our nation needs to recognize the value of other paths—additional paths, such as apprenticeships and technical programs.” I call this approach to creating additional paths to success opportunity pluralism.

This week, the nation celebrates the 10th annual National Apprenticeship Week. As we commemorate this celebration, it’s useful to take a look at America’s growing appetite for an increasing array of earn-and-learn apprenticeship programs.

Keep reading in Discourse Magazine.

Manno for Forbes: Lessons Starting K-12 Chartered Schools Can Help Create More Apprenticeships

National Apprenticeship Week is November 17 to 23

“Businesses don’t launch and run apprenticeships on their own. What America needs most is a thousand intermediaries working hard to make apprenticeship infrastructure where there was none before,” writes Achieve Managing Partner Ryan Craig in his book Apprenticeship Nation.

Apprenticeship intermediaries connect and serve the partner organizations that create earn-and-learn apprenticeship programs. The work of establishing lots of good ones has much to learn from the 33-year-old effort to create a new chartered sector of U.S. K-12 public schools.

National Apprenticeship Week is a suitable time to review what apprenticeship intermediaries do and suggest four lessons learned from the charter school movement that are relevant to expanding the number of intermediaries. I hope that this encourages a more thorough conversation between those from the world of chartering and the world of apprenticing that helps both groups become more effective at what they do.

Read more in Forbes. 

Manno for Philanthropy Daily: Yes, Charter Schools Do Reduce Inequality

This is the first article of a two-part series on charter schools. The second will appear on 11/20/24 and is titled “What Donors Should Know About Evaluating Charter Schools.”

There is glaring student achievement inequality in America’s public schools. Rigorous evidence suggests that “a substantial portion of the unequal education outcomes that we see between richer and poor students is related not to home, but to what happens in school.” Charter schools are reducing that inequality by closing achievement gaps between groups and improving outcomes for all students.

Since 1991, 46 charter laws have created 8,000 schools and campuses that enroll 3.7 million students, around 7.5% of all public school students. Enrollment in these independent public school of choice that are accountable for results is increasing while traditional district school enrollment is decreasing. For example, over the five years from 2019-2020 to 2023-2024, charter enrollment grew by around 12% or 393,000 students, while district enrollment decreased by around 4% or 1,750,000 students. Around six out of 10 (58%) charter schools are in urban areas, with the remainder in suburbs (25%), rural areas (11%), and smaller towns (6%).

Has this charter growth harmed traditional public schools? And how can we be sure that charter schools are meeting the needs of students who most need help?

Over the last 18 months, four national and two state reports on charter schools were released. In what follows, I summarize those reports, providing more evidence of a dynamic, self-improving charter sector that reduces student academic inequality.

Keep reading in Philanthropy Daily.

PPI’s Bruno Manno Submits Testimony to the DC Council on Proposed Bill 25-741 Vocational Education for a New Generation Act of 2024

The following is a national perspective testimony submitted by Bruno Manno, on behalf of the Progressive Policy Institute, to the DC Council on Proposed Bill 25-741 Vocational Education for a New Generation Act of 2024.

Many Americans, including the last wave of Gen Zers now entering high school, want schools to offer more education and training options for young people, like career and technical education, or CTE. They broadly agree that the K–12 goal of “college for all” over the last several decades has not served all students well. It should be replaced with “opportunity pluralism,” or the recognition that a college degree is one of many pathways to post-secondary success.

School-based CTE programs (there are also programs for adults) typically prepare middle and high school students for a range of high-wage, high-skill, and high-demand careers. These include fields like advanced manufacturing, health sciences, and information technology, which often do not require a two- or four-year college degree. CTE programs award students recognized credentials like industry certifications and licenses. Some programs also provide continuing opportunities for individuals to sequence credentials so that they can pursue associate and bachelor’s degrees if they choose.

Read Manno’s full testimony here.

Pankovits and Nathan on Medium: Walz’s Even-Handed Approach to Chartering

By Tressa Pankovits and Joe Nathan

By this stage of the election, it’s difficult to find something to write about the candidates for president and vice president that hasn’t been repeated dozens of times, but here’s one. 

Conventional wisdom has it that because Kamala Harris and her running mate have courted the teachers unions, they believe that charter schools are the enemy. Maybe there’s hope that they don’t. 

Harris picked Governor Tim Walz even though during the pandemic he listened to the pleas of charter school students with a serious problem The story that hasn’t gotten national attention, but as Harris and Walz seek to rally the youth vote in the final days of the campaign, the campaign should amplify Walz’s willingness to listen to a bunch of teenagers and act on their concerns. 

Continue reading on Medium.

Manno for Forbes: Dual Enrollment Blends High School, College, And Workforce Education And Training

The way America prepares young people for work and life is being disrupted. Clear-cut institutional boundaries that historically separated the programs and responsibilities of high schools, colleges, and employers are now permeable boundaries.

One well-known example of these permeable boundaries is earn-and-learn apprenticeships for young people. These apprenticeships combine a job that pays with adult mentorship and related classroom instruction provided by a high school or other education and training institution. On the other hand, high school dual enrollment programs are a below-the-radar example of this disruption of institutional boundaries.

This disruption poses huge challenges for schools, colleges, and employers. But Americans have risen to this challenge before.

Keep reading in Forbes.

PPI Releases New Report on the Role of American Identity in Strengthening Working America

WASHINGTON — The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) today released a new report, “How Teaching American Identity Can Strengthen Working America,” authored by Richard D. Kahlenberg, Director of PPI’s American Identity Project. This report underscores the significance of instilling a shared sense of American identity to bridge cultural divides, promote unity, and support the economic and social needs of working-class Americans.

This new publication is the seventh in a series of papers published in PPI’s Campaign for Working America, which was launched earlier this year in partnership with former U.S. Representative Tim Ryan of Ohio. The Campaign aims to develop and test new themes, ideas, and policy proposals that help Democrats and other center-left leaders make a compelling economic offer to working Americans, bridge divides on culturally sensitive issues like immigration and education, and rally public support for the defense of democracy and freedom globally. Other papers cover career paths for non-college workers, housing, and competition.

Kahlenberg’s report highlights a critical gap in American public education — the failure to promote a common civic identity. It calls for policies that counteract divisive identity politics on both ends of the political spectrum and advocates for a return to a cohesive, patriotic narrative that champions shared values.

While it is true that working Americans care deeply about kitchen table economic concerns, polling suggests they care enormously about how the larger American story is told.   

“Many working-class Americans feel disillusioned by a lack of unity and patriotism in our society,” said Kahlenberg. “Reinstating an educational emphasis on our national story can strengthen social cohesion, enhance economic opportunities, and equip working families with the tools to pursue the American Dream.” Advances in economic opportunity for working Americans are most likely to occur, Kahlenberg said, when policies are tied to a larger patriotic vision.

The report, which builds upon earlier work, outlines a robust agenda for policymakers focused on revitalizing American identity and patriotism in public schools, with nine key recommendations, including:

  • Prioritize Civics Education: Increase resources and ensure students graduate with a strong understanding of U.S. history and civics, critical for democracy
  • Teach Global Context: Educate students on life in non-democratic nations to foster appreciation for American freedoms
  • Promote a Balanced History: Provide a fair account of American history, highlighting both struggles and achievements
  • Reform DEI and Ethnic Studies Programs: Shift Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs to emphasize shared values over divisive narratives
  • Teach American Exceptionalism Thoughtfully: Introduce thinkers on American Exceptionalism, focusing on what makes the U.S. unique as a nation built on ideas
  • Support School Integration Efforts: Encourage voluntary socio-economic integration in schools to foster equality and inclusivity
  • Expand Community and National Service Programs: Create programs that unite young Americans in shared service and commitment to their country
  • Encourage Civil Discourse: Teach principles of free speech and respectful debate to equip students for constructive democratic engagement
  • Provide Federal Support for Civic Education Programs: Offer federal grants to strengthen civics education and foster patriotism across communities

This approach not only aligns with Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign vision of “patriotism for all” but also rejects divisive educational ideologies, instead emphasizing a balanced, unifying narrative that reflects America’s complex history while celebrating its potential for redemption and progress.

Read and download the report here.

The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) is a catalyst for policy innovation and political reform based in Washington, D.C. Its mission is to create radically pragmatic ideas for moving America beyond ideological and partisan deadlock. Learn more about PPI by visiting progressivepolicy.org. Find an expert at PPI and follow us on Twitter.

###

Media Contact: Ian O’Keefe – iokeefe@ppionline.org

How Teaching American Identity Can Strengthen Working America

Campaign for Working America PPI

Introduction

American liberal democracy is being threatened in a way not seen in generations, in large measure, because white identity politics on the right, and racial identity politics on the left, make fights over policy seem existential. When policy battles appear to be part of a larger war rooted in a clash of ethnic and racial identity groups, both sides are more willing to disregard long-standing liberal democratic norms.

On the right, Donald Trump tried to disrupt the peaceful transition of power after he lost the 2020 presidential election, and he talks of suspending the Constitution if he becomes president again. Left-wing activists, meanwhile, shout down speakers and create a chilling environment where people feel they can’t freely speak their minds.

Pundits often assume that working Americans, who must prioritize kitchen-table economic concerns, don’t care about these systemic issues. In fact, however, working Americans are especially affected by the breakdown in national unity and the decline in patriotism that serve as root causes of the erosion in liberal democratic beliefs.

To begin with, the decline in American patriotism directly offends the value systems of many non-college-educated voters. Polls reveal a patriotism gap between progressive elites and working Americans of all races. While 69% of working-class voters said that America is the greatest country in the world, among progressive activists, only 28% agreed.

It is good news, therefore, that Vice President Kamala Harris has, in her campaign for president, embraced a full-throated patriotism that puts her on the side of working Americans. At the Democratic convention, Harris advanced a powerful visions of liberal patriotism that identified the United States as “the greatest democracy in the history of the world.” She said America is an inspiration to people across the planet because in this country, “anything is possible. Nothing is out of reach.” She called for national unity, declaring, “We have so much more in common that what separates us.” She didn’t mention white privilege, and instead focused on “the privilege and pride of being an American.” She concluded that America has “the most extraordinary story ever told.”

Some highly educated elites may believe their less elevated view of America is related to a greater degree of sophistication and knowledge of America’s sins. But in fact, racial minorities, who presumably have an acute cognizance of racial injustice, are very likely to express patriotic feelings. Some 62% of Asian Americans, 70% of Black Americans, and 76% of Hispanic Americans said they were “proud to be an American,” compared with just 34% of progressive activists.

To the extent that many non-college-educated voters have immigrant roots, their patriotism may actually be based on a higher level of sophistication about the realities of the world outside the United States than educated leftists who are quick to find fault with the United States. Polls find that immigrants have more patriotic beliefs than those who were born in the United States. This patriotism may well stem from their first-hand experience with the repressive systems of government that are found in many other countries.

In addition, the decline in American patriotism and social cohesion is bad for non-college-educated Americans because it inhibits their efforts to fight for a fairer society. Emphasizing racial division typically hurts working Americans. In fact, the oldest story of American politics is one in which conservatives use racial division to keep working Americans from cooperating across racial lines to smooth out the roughest edges of democratic capitalism. By contrast, the great advances for working-class people have come when Democratic politicians, such as Franklin Roosevelt, appealed to patriotism and national unity. As John Judis and Ruy Teixeira note in their book, Where Have All the Democrats Gone?, New Deal Democrats “extolled ‘the American way of life’ (a term popularized in the 1930s); they used patriotic symbols like the ‘Blue Eagle’ to promote their programs. In 1940, Roosevelt’s official campaign song was Irving Berlin’s ‘God Bless America.’” Only when Americans feel a sense of common mission is their sense of a shared responsibility for the fate of their fellow Americans activated.

Finally, non-college-educated voters are particularly hurt by a decline in American identity and patriotism because these realities are being used by right-wing advocates to undermine American public education — which has historically provided a critical path for social mobility for working Americans. In recent years, race-essentialist left-wing ideologies, such as critical race theory, which sees racism as endemic and permanent, and anti-racism, which posits that the only remedy to discrimination is more discrimination, have had an enormous impact on teacher schools of education, which then translates into what young public schoolchildren are taught. These approaches have understandably promoted a backlash. The appropriate response is to institute broadly-
supported teachings that frankly acknowledge America’s history of slavery and segregation, but also teach that because of our liberal, democratic structures, redemption has been possible.

Right-wing advocates, however, have used the cultural disconnect between what most Americans believe and left-wing indoctrination by some teachers as an excuse to discard the entire enterprise of public education. In the past few years, red states have adopted an unprecedented number of school privatization initiatives. Evidence shows that recent success with privatization efforts is driven by the perception that schools are feeding left-wing ideology to students.

Privatization, in turn, hurts working families in two ways. First, research shows that private school voucher programs can cause a decline in academic achievement compared with public district and public charter schools, robbing working-class students of the skills they need to advance. Second, a system of private school education, in which 80% of students will go off to be educated in particularly religious traditions, with no mandate to teach common American values, removes one of the few remaining vehicles in America for forging social cohesion and national unity.

What is to be done? In an in-depth Progressive Policy report, I outline nine ideas for local, state, and federal policymakers can adopt to help public schools — and colleges — return to the central goal of public education.11 The primary mission, encapsulated by the late president of the American Federation of Teachers, Albert Shanker, is to “teach children what it means to be an American,” by which he meant “a common set of values and beliefs” expressed most vividly in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution.

Read the full report.

Pankovits in Fox News: School choice success: Study shows robust charter school programs bridge performance gaps for low-income kids

New analysis sheds light on how charter schools are making strides in leveling the academic playing field for students in low-income areas, suggesting a brighter future for these children in areas that don’t shy away from school choice.

The Progressive Policy Institute’s (PPI’s) report titled “Searching for the Tipping Point: Scaling Up Public School Choice Spurs Citywide Gains,” authored by educational equity advocate Tressa Pankovits, suggested cities with robust public charter school options for low-income families are seeing beneficial outcomes for all students.

Charter schools, according to the Georgia Department of Education, are publicly funded schools that operate “under the terms of a charter, or contract, with an authorizer, such as the state and local boards of education,” but receive flexibility in certain areas “in exchange for a higher degree of accountability for raising student achievement.”

“Our report belies the oft-heard but unfounded criticism that charters somehow drain legacy schools of the ‘best’ students and resources, to the detriment of those left behind,” Pankovits’ analysis states. “Evidently, the growth of enrollment in charter schools creates a positive competitive dynamic with the traditional district schools, which have to up their game to attract parents and students.”

Read more in Fox News.

Manno for Stanford Social Innovation Review: The End of ‘College for All’

For at least the last 25 years, the primary goal of K-12 schools in the United States has been “college for all”—the ideal that all high school graduates go to college. As a result, America’s schools do not typically provide young people with work experience or make career education central to their offerings. This gap leaves high school students with little understanding of work and the practical pathways to jobs, careers, and further education.

Today, college for all is losing public support. When Americans were asked to rank their priorities for K-12 education, “being prepared to enroll in a college or university” dropped from the 10th highest priority (out of 57) in 2019 to 47th in 2022, according to the nonpartisan think tank Populace. Other surveys reveal a growing skepticism about the value of a four-year degree. More than half of Americans (56 percent) think a degree is not worth the cost, with skepticism most pronounced among college-degree holders ages 18 to 34.

Many employers, meanwhile, no longer use a college degree as the gatekeeper credential for jobs, shifting from degree-based to skills-based hiring. And a study published by Strada Education Foundation of the careers of more than 60 million workers and millions of online job postings found that 10 years after degree completion, 45 percent of graduates were underemployed in jobs not requiring a degree.

Keep reading in Stanford Social Innovation Review’s Fall 2024 Edition.

Manno for Forbes: Charter Schools’ Virtuous Improvement Cycle Betters K-12 System

“Charter school laws have been arguably the most influential school reform efforts of the past several decades,” write economists Douglas Harris and Feng Chen.

Since the first law creating these independent public schools of choice was passed in 1991, we’ve learned many lessons about their impact on students, the traditional K-12 system, and the communities where they exist. Here are three of those lessons:

1. Charter schools reduce academic inequality by closing student
achievement gaps.

2. Charter schools raise the overall quality of public schools.

3. Creating more charter schools will improve the quality of K-12 public schools and reduce inequality in America.

This is what I call the virtuous improvement cycle of charter schools.

Keep reading in Forbes.