PPI’s Trade Fact of the Week: Humanity is ‘aging’ three months each year

FACT: Humanity is “aging” three months each year.

THE NUMBERS: Median age* –
Japan 49.0 years
Europe 42.0 years
U.S. 37.9 years
World 30.5 years
Africa 19.0 years
Niger 14.5 years


* Our World in Data

WHAT THEY MEAN:

Writing in retirement at Saladin’s court in 1185, the 90-year-old aristocrat ibn Munqidh goes in for some moping. In his youth, ibn M. recalls, he cheerfully rode off on weekends to spear Crusaders, political rivals, and charismatic megafauna.  Now he’s worn out by a bit of calligraphy:

When I wake up I feel like a mountain is on top of me
When I walk, it’s like wearing chains
I creep around with a cane in my hand …
My hand struggles to hold up a pen, when it once
Broke spears in the hearts of lions.

Yes, well, happens to us all these days.  In that era, and for most of human history, not so much.  Until the 19th century life expectancy at birth was about 30 — that is, only half the public got to 30 — and a 25-year-old expected (on average) to live to 50. Ibn M. was an extreme outlier, having avoided first the pre-1800 40% child mortality rate and then the high chance of getting carried off later on by plagues, accidents, predators, or competent enemies, and making it to his 10th decade.

Today, by contrast, the elderly demographic — already with 150 million people over 80 — is the world’s fastest-growing. This, plus the fact that birth rates have fallen by nearly half since the 1970s, means that humanity is aging. Our World in Data’s tabulation finds this year’s global “median age to be 30 1/2, meaning that (a) more than half of us are over 30, and (b) the person exactly in the middle was born in 1992. Our World’s figure is about ten years older than the 20-year median of 1970 and five years older than the 25-year median of 2000, and is projected to creep up by three months per year for the next half-century. The worldwide medians over the last 50 years, with a tentative estimate for 2050, look like this:

2050      36?
2022       30
2010       27
2000     25
1970       20

Worldwide averages, of course, conceal lots of variation.  Details by region below; but in general, East Asia and Europe are “old,” with median ages over 40; Japan is currently the “oldest” country* at 49.  Africa is “youngest” with a median age of 19 (and turbulent Niger is the world’s single “youngest” country at 14 and a half), with the Pacific islands second-youngest. The other regions are in the middle, with Latin America and the Caribbean exactly at the world’s 30-and-a-half-year average (but aging fastest of all), and South Asia, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East a bit below. The U.S. is above the world average at 39, but aging only about 2 and a half months per year, while Europe adds about 3 and a half months, Asia 4 months, and Latin America 5 months.

So: In Europe and East Asia especially, the next decades’ experience will probably be one in which people (whether or not they start wistfully putting down their spears) start getting tired as they push around the modern equivalents of calligraphy pens. Economists accordingly predict rising demand for health equipment and telemedicine services; labor shortages in western countries and East Asia, combined with lower GDP growth rates with which to pay the new workers; production and consumer booms in India, Africa, and parts of the Middle East; and politics increasingly dominated by arguments over how to pay for health and pensions. Still, as ibn Munqidh might reluctantly agree, better than any realistic alternative.

* Counting countries with populations above 100,000. The Vatican, with about 800 people, is technically the oldest country, with its various Cardinals, secretaries, and Swiss Guards at a median age of about 58.

 

FURTHER READING

  

Our World in Data’s interactive table of median ages by country, region, income group, etc., from 1950 to the present with projections to 2100.

The CIA’s World Factbook ranks countries by life expectancy.

The International Monetary Fund has thoughts on aging, growth rates, and finance,

The World Health Organization on new health challenges.

And Usama bin Munqidh on old age, medieval battle tactics, poetry, calligraphy, Crusaders’ odd gender habits and loony “trial-by-ordeal” and “trial-by-combat” legal theories, the mighty Saladin, etc.

Detail by region

Oldest: Europe is the world’s “oldest” region with a median age of 42 — that is, 12 years above the world median.  Italy, with a median of 47, has Europe’s oldest population with Portuguese, Germans, Greeks, and Bulgarians next at 45.  East Asia, at 40, is almost as venerable at Europe, and Japan is currently the world’s “oldest” country,* with a median age hitting 49 this year.  (Japanese also have the world’s longest lifespan, at 87.)  A bit north, Koreans are slightly more youthful at 43 but aging faster, with Korea likely to pass Japan by 2040 and hold the “world’s-oldest country” status for the rest of the 21st century. Mainland China’s median age of 38 — exactly equal to America’s — is the region’s youngest but rising fast. China is likely to catch Europe in the next decade and pass Japan somewhere around mid-century, as this fall’s Shanghai elementary schoolers begin contemplating retirement.

Youngest: If the median Asians and Europeans are middle-agers thinking about young children and home payments, the “median” African is a buoyant 19-year-old just starting a career.  In the world’s “youngest” country, the median Nigerien (hopefully steering clear of Niamey’s edgy military patrols last month) is a 14-and-a-half-year-old high school freshman born in the spring of 2008. Eight of sub-Saharan Africa’s 49 countries have median ages below 16, and 36 below 20. The Pacific Islands are just slightly “older” as the world’s second-youngest region, with the Solomon Islands and Vanuatu at medians of 19 years, and Samoa and Timor-Leste at 20.

Middle-aged: Other regions cluster closer to the world average. In South and Southeast Asia, median ages for India, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Burma are all just a bit below the world average at 28 or 29. The Philippines and Pakistan are “young” at 24; Sri Lanka and Vietnam a bit older than average at 32. Singapore and Thailand are the region’s seniors, with the median Singaporean now 42 years old and the median Thai 40. In the Middle East and near neighbors, the age range is similar but skews a bit younger: median ages are in the teens in Yemen, the Palestinian territories, and Iraq; 28 or 29 in Egypt, Jordan, Israel, Morocco, and Lebanon; and 31 and 32 in Azerbaijan, Turkey, and Iran. Latin America and the Caribbean, finally, perfectly match the worldwide median at 30 and a half, with Cuba the “oldest” at 41 and Haiti and Honduras “youngest” at 23; Brazil is 32, Mexico 29, and Peru 28.

The United States: The U.S. can look quite young, or a bit “tempered by experience,” or right in the middle, depending on what group you put it in. Three options:

  • As a “western” country joined with the EU, Canada, the UK, Switzerland, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand, etc., the U.S. is very much on the youthful side. All the Asian democracies are “older” than the U.S.; and in Europe, only Albania, Iceland, Ireland, Armenia, and Georgia have lower median ages than the U.S., and none of them by much.
  • As a “Western Hemisphere” country, the U.S. remains for now on the older side, eight years above the Latin/Caribbean average. Over the next 20 years, though, norteamericanos will age only gently while Latin America’s age at the world’s fastest pace. By 2040, the U.S./Latin age gap will be only four years, and Brazil, Colombia, and Costa Rica will all be “older” than the U.S.
  • Finally, in an “Anglosphere” group with Canada, New Zealand, Australia, the U.K., and Ireland, the U.S. looks pretty much average. As of 2023, this group bunches closely together, in a range from New Zealand’s 36-and-a-half median to Canada’s 40-and-a-half, with the U.S. exactly in the middle. Projections to the 2040s find them even closer, all within 2.5 years of one another, with the U.S. “youngest.”

 

ABOUT ED

Ed Gresser is Vice President and Director for Trade and Global Markets at PPI.

Ed returns to PPI after working for the think tank from 2001-2011. He most recently served as the Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Trade Policy and Economics at the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). In this position, he led USTR’s economic research unit from 2015-2021, and chaired the 21-agency Trade Policy Staff Committee.

Ed began his career on Capitol Hill before serving USTR as Policy Advisor to USTR Charlene Barshefsky from 1998 to 2001. He then led PPI’s Trade and Global Markets Project from 2001 to 2011. After PPI, he co-founded and directed the independent think tank Progressive Economy until rejoining USTR in 2015. In 2013, the Washington International Trade Association presented him with its Lighthouse Award, awarded annually to an individual or group for significant contributions to trade policy.

Ed is the author of Freedom from Want: American Liberalism and the Global Economy (2007).  He has published in a variety of journals and newspapers, and his research has been cited by leading academics and international organizations including the WTO, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund. He is a graduate of Stanford University and holds a Master’s Degree in International Affairs from Columbia Universities and a certificate from the Averell Harriman Institute for Advanced Study of the Soviet Union.

Read the full email and sign up for the Trade Fact of the Week

New Report: Congress should rethink extending the Durbin Amendment to credit card interchange fees

Washington, D.C. — In 2010, the Durbin Amendment was enacted as part of the historic banking bill, the Dodd-Frank Act, and established a ceiling on debit card interchange fees — the cost that merchants pay each time a customer makes a purchase using a credit or debit card. While this legislation was intended to lower costs for consumers, when studied, the expected price reductions never came to pass, and in some cases, prices actually rose.

Lawmakers are now considering implementing a similar model to cap interchange fees for credit card transactions. Today, the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) released a new report “No Change Needed: Congress Should Rethink Extending the Durbin Amendment to Credit Card Interchange Fees” detailing why extending the law to interchange fees for credit cards would harm consumers.

The report, written by Paul Weinstein Jr., Senior Fellow at PPI, outlines how numerous studies found no evidence that the cap on debit card interchange fees has led to savings for consumers. Furthermore, there is considerable evidence that extending the Durbin Amendment to credit cards would not only fail to provide consumers with any savings, it could actually leave them worse off.

“Despite how well-intended the Durbin Amendment was, the fact remains that the law had little or no impact on prices, and in some cases, may have even led to higher costs for consumers,” said Paul Weinstein. “Extending the Durbin Amendment to credit card interchange fees could ultimately hurt consumers by ending access to rewards offered by credit card providers, and increase security risks for cardholders.”

Read and download the report here.

The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) is a catalyst for policy innovation and political reform based in Washington, D.C., with offices in Brussels, Berlin and the United Kingdom. Its mission is to create radically pragmatic ideas for moving America beyond ideological and partisan deadlock. Learn more about PPI by visiting progressivepolicy.org.

Follow the Progressive Policy Institute.

Find an expert at PPI.

###

Media Contact: Amelia Fox, afox@ppionline.org

No Change Needed: Congress Should Rethink Extending the Durbin Amendment to Credit Card Interchange Fees

INTRODUCTION

One of the greatest challenges for policymakers is the “unexpected negative consequence” of a change in law or regulation. There is a well-documented history of proposed policies that have achieved successes, but not without negative externalities. Prohibition in the 1920s United States, originally enacted to suppress the alcohol trade, drove many small-time alcohol suppliers out of business and consolidated the hold of large-scale organized crime over the illegal alcohol industry. 

Tradeoffs in pursuit of greater benefits to society are worth the cost if the positives are greater than the negatives. But if the negative consequences of a policy change outweigh the benefits — or actually make the problem worse — then that policy can only be described as problematic and worth reconsidering. The “Durbin Amendment, enacted as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, has been cited by some as an example of a policy that did not achieve the goals of the authors of the policy while imposing new costs on the financial and debit exchange sectors. Yet despite its mixed record, some in Congress want to extend the Durbin Amendment to interchange fees for credit cards.

READ THE FULL REPORT. 

 

Pankovits for Real Clear Education: Why Are We Cheating Public Charter Schools Out of Funding?

By Tressa Pankovits

You wouldn’t pay steakhouse prices for a fast-food burger, would you? Didn’t think so.

So, why do we send the lion’s share of our public K-12 education dollars to schools that can’t keep up with the financially lean education machines that outperform them?

I’m talking about public charter schools, of course. These free, public schools that disproportionately serve low-income and minority children are the subject of two recently released independent studies. Taking the studies together, pragmatic thinkers might wonder how we could be so indifferent to blatant discrimination against our most marginalized students.

Keep reading in Real Clear Education.

Jacoby for The Bulwark: How to Think About Ukraine’s War on Corruption

By Tamar Jacoby

BIG NEWS FROM UKRAINE LAST WEEKEND didn’t register for most Americans relaxing for Labor Day or busy getting the kids back to school—and for those who did notice, the response seems to have been little more than a tired, there-they-go-again shrug. After all, what’s new about Ukrainian corruption scandals?

In fact, the story is much more complicated and important—and worthy of American attention. Ukraine’s war on corruption is closely linked to the war it’s waging on the battlefield. Losing the fight against graft and influence peddling would doom the new nation Ukrainians want to build as much as a forever war with Russia. And in this case, too, as with the shooting war, Americans and Europeans can help.

Keep reading in The Bulwark.

Diana Moss to Launch New Competition Policy Center at PPI

Washington, D.C. – Today, the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) announced that Dr. Diana Moss has joined as Vice President and Director of Competition Policy and will launch a new center to advocate for strong competition enforcement and policy.

Moss will build out PPI’s expertise in competition in areas such as food and agriculture, communications, and transportation, as well as supporting PPI’s existing policy efforts with competition analysis on issues such as health care, technology, workforce, and energy.

Moss previously served as President of the American Antitrust Institute from 2015 to 2023. Her work spans the economic, policy, and legal analysis of antitrust enforcement and sector regulation across a range of sectors.

“I’m thrilled to join the Progressive Policy Institute to spearhead a cutting-edge competition policy program. I look forward to continuing my work to expand productive and impactful, pro-competition dialogue with government, businesses, consumer groups and other stakeholders,” said Diana Moss.

“The Progressive Policy Institute is thrilled to have a leading expert in competition policy, Dr. Diana Moss, to join our team and bring the center-left perspective to the ongoing competition debate. We are in the midst of key debates over the future of antitrust reform, the importance of the consumer welfare standard, and ideological differences that can influence policy making. How current and future administrations resolve these issues will set a critical economic framework for our future,” said Lindsay Lewis, Executive Director at PPI.

Yesterday, Moss moderated a panel discussion hosted by the American Bar Association’s Antitrust Section with legal and economic experts, including a U.S. District Court judge and a representative from the Department of Justice on merger litigation under the proposed revised merger guidelines. This fall, Moss will also speak on competition panels on digital technology and innovation at Temple University School of Law and Penn State Dickinson Law.

The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) is a catalyst for policy innovation and political reform based in Washington, D.C. Its mission is to create radically pragmatic ideas for moving America beyond ideological and partisan deadlock. Learn more about PPI by visiting progressivepolicy.org.

Follow the Progressive Policy Institute.

###

Media Contact: Amelia Fox – afox@ppionline.org

Lewis for MinnPost: Many of the nation’s AGs are in town, and can now decide to refocus — away from high tech

By Lindsay Mark Lewis

Over the years, state attorneys general have become increasingly influential in shaping discourse and political agendas across America. Assuming the role of “top cop” in each of their respective states, their purview rests in the consumer protection space: going after fraudsters, scammers and price gougers.

One mechanism that has grown in popularity over the past decade has been pulling the levers of antitrust law to protect consumers. In this space, in particular, there is a need for a reset. With local economies and family budgets on the line, prioritization is crucial.

As Democratic attorneys general gather this week in Minneapolis for their annual policy conference, there is an opportunity to do just that.

Keep reading in MinnPost.

PPI’s Trade Fact of the Week: First intercontinental submarine cable message: August 1858.

FACT: First intercontinental submarine cable message: August 1858.

THE NUMBERS: Cable data capacity –

2Africa, 2023:                180,000,000,000,000.0 bytes per second
TAT-8, 1988:                                   280,000,000.0 bytes per second
Atlantic Telegraph, 1858:                               0.1 bytes per second

WHAT THEY MEAN:

It’s been 165 years since the first shout across the oceans: The submarine cable joining the United States and the U.K. in 1858, via terminals at Newfoundland and Valentia Bay in Ireland, was as thick as a finger and weighed a ton per mile. The inventors coated a core of seven copper wires with waterproof gutta-percha (the dried sap of a Malaysian tree, used then to make golf-balls and piano keys), then wrapped it in hemp and sealed the hemp with tar, and finally covered the whole assemble with iron wire cladding. Two newly designed steam warships, U.S.S. Niagara and HMS Agamemnon, unspooled the wire and met in the middle to splice the wire together. The cable’s first message, a suitably austere 657-character note from the mighty Queen Victoria to the less admiringly-remembered President James Buchanan, arrived on August 16th after a sixteen-hour transmission:

TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, WASHINGTON: The Queen desires to congratulate the President upon the successful completion of this great international work, in which The Queen has taken the deepest interest. The Queen is convinced that the President will join her in fervently hoping that the electric cable, which now connects great Britain with the United States, will prove an additional link between the nations, whose friendship is founded upon their common interest and reciprocal esteem. The Queen has much pleasure in thus communicating with the President, and renewing to him her wishes for the prosperity of the United States.

The cable broke down in September and wasn’t replaced until after the Civil War. By 1880, though, second-generation copper wires centered on London connected not only the UK, continental Europe and North America, but China, Australia, India, Egypt, South Africa, Singapore, Russia, Japan, and South America. The first trans-Pacific cable, from San Francisco to Honolulu, went live in 1902. The first fiber-optic cable, TAT-8, lit up in 1988; by 2002, the modern ultra-pure glass network had replaced copper entirely.

Seventeen decades after the Queen’s first tweet-like message, 60 specially-designed cable-laying ships are busily unspooling new and more powerful cables at a pace of about three per month. Cable specialists Telegeography report 552 active fiber-optic cables as of mid-2023, together making up about 1.4 million kilometers of wire, and 35 new ones this year. These are about the same size as the 1858 cable – about a finger’s width, and weighing more or less the same, but replacing (a) the chubby copper wires with up to 96 hair’s-width fibers of ultra-pure glass, (b) the electric Morse pulses with modulated laser light, (c) the gutta-percha, hemp, and tar with a silica cladding, and (d) the iron sheath with plastics. A selection of cables lighting up this year:

*   2Africa, circumnavigating Africa from the Mediterranean around the Cape and back up to the Red Sea across 45,000 kilometers, with 48 terminals in 33 countries including Italy, Ghana, Nigeria, Congo, South Africa, the Comoros, Somalia, Pakistan, UAE, etc., is said to be the longest cable in the world. It has a capacity of 180 terabytes of data per second, about a million times the capacity of now-antique TAT-8, and 2 quadrillion times that of the 1858 Atlantic cable.

*   FISH (“Fiber Internet Serving Homes in Alaska”), with a more modest length of 276 kilometers, connecting the Alaska mainland with islands.

*   Amitie, linking France with Lynn, Massachusetts, across 6,792 kilometers, with a branch to the UK.

*   Topaz, a Google cable connecting Vancouver and Japan, length not yet reported to Telegeography.

*   Natitua Sud, a 2,680-km wire connecting Tahiti with southern islands in French Polynesia (and building on the earlier Natitua connection to the Marquesas).

Moving from physical infrastructure to daily life, submarine cables are often said to carry about 99 percent of all internet traffic. Telegeography tried to verify this factoid a few years ago and found the last FCC pronunciation on the matter dating to 2013. But they thought it wasn’t a unreasonable guess (though satellite deployment probably brings the share down a bit each year). Whatever the right figure, submarine cables remain the big arteries of the global information economy, carrying most of the $10 trillion in daily currency transactions; most of the U.S.’ $700 billion in annual digitally enabled services exports; and most of the world’s on-line exchanges. The latter includes this email, which has more bytes than Queen Victoria’s message, but by traveling via glass and laser as opposed to copper and electrical pulse took (assuming an average email speed) required not 16 hours but about 1/10th of a second to reach you this afternoon.

 

FURTHER READING

      Now —

Telegeography’s up-to-date submarine cable map.

The International Cable Protection Committee, a consortium of cable operators and regulators, reports on the world’s 60 operating cable ships.

… and a painting version of HMS Agamemnonone of the two original cable ships, and as a first-generation steamship a maritime innovator in its own right.

On MOSAIC’s monthly podcast, PPI’s Ed Gresser joins FCC alumna/telecom policy expert Meagan Bolton and Alaska broadband advocate Christine O’Connor to learn about what’s coming next, closing the digital divide as modern civil rights, broadband deployment in Native American communities and more.

Policy — 

From the White House, the 61-country Declaration on the Future of the Internet.

… and with the Declaration as a point of departure, Gresser’s look at digital trade policy.

Now and then —

What’s in a fiber-optic cable.  The glass, the cladding, the plastics all explained.

The Institute of Electronics and Electrical Engineers looks back at the first cable’s technical advances, flaws, and lessons.

And the U.K.’s Royal Trust reprints the August 1858 message and its arrival on tickertape.  (And a little cheekily defines Buchanan as a “subject”.  Obvious response from the left side of the Atlantic: ‘we’re not amused’.)

 

ABOUT ED

Ed Gresser is Vice President and Director for Trade and Global Markets at PPI.

Ed returns to PPI after working for the think tank from 2001-2011. He most recently served as the Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Trade Policy and Economics at the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). In this position, he led USTR’s economic research unit from 2015-2021, and chaired the 21-agency Trade Policy Staff Committee.

Ed began his career on Capitol Hill before serving USTR as Policy Advisor to USTR Charlene Barshefsky from 1998 to 2001. He then led PPI’s Trade and Global Markets Project from 2001 to 2011. After PPI, he co-founded and directed the independent think tank Progressive Economy until rejoining USTR in 2015. In 2013, the Washington International Trade Association presented him with its Lighthouse Award, awarded annually to an individual or group for significant contributions to trade policy.

Ed is the author of Freedom from Want: American Liberalism and the Global Economy (2007).  He has published in a variety of journals and newspapers, and his research has been cited by leading academics and international organizations including the WTO, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund. He is a graduate of Stanford University and holds a Master’s Degree in International Affairs from Columbia Universities and a certificate from the Averell Harriman Institute for Advanced Study of the Soviet Union.

Read the full email and sign up for the Trade Fact of the Week

PPI Statement Ahead of Labor Day: It’s Time for America’s Leaders to Recommit to Workers

Taylor Maag, Director of Workforce Development Policy and the New Skills for a New Economy Project at the Progressive Policy Institute, released the following statement ahead of Labor Day.

“As Americans across the country begin to celebrate this Labor Day, we must remember the reason for the long weekend — American workers. While we have made tremendous strides over the last century when Labor Day became a federal holiday, workers are still facing increased challenges navigating the economy and the rapidly-changing labor market from automation and technological innovation.

“This year, instead of a generic Labor Day statement, PPI urges policymakers at all levels of government to recommit to supporting workers across our nation. This recommitment does not mean pouring more dollars into the status quo, but focusing on quality skill development strategies and supportive services, such as deploying new and innovative policies that help workers navigate the ever-evolving nature of our workforce.

“America must invest in workers at an early age and continue to support them throughout their careers, including expanding apprenticeship programs, establishing more flexible postsecondary programs that better meet the needs or workers and their families, and investing in public and private partnerships to provide new ways of delivery learning that are tied to industry demand.”

Last year, PPI’s New Skills for a New Economy project released a framework, laying out these key priorities, among others, that are needed to create a more worker-centric policy agenda.

New Skills for a New Economy, a project of PPI, seeks to promote workforce development policies that level the playing field for degree and non-degree workers. This project plays a critical role in shaping federal and state workforce policy, weighing in on important debates, key legislation, and helping to lift up new ideas and best practices happening across the country.

The Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) is a catalyst for policy innovation and political reform based in Washington, D.C. Its mission is to create radically pragmatic ideas for moving America beyond ideological and partisan deadlock. Learn more about PPI by visiting progressivepolicy.org. Find an expert at PPI and follow us on Twitter.

###

Media Contact: Amelia Fox – afox@ppionline.org

“Ever Rising: The Renaissance of HBCUs and K12 Education” and the UNCF UNITE Summit

“Don’t let the term ‘charter school’ fool you.” My words rang out through Atlanta’s Hyatt Regency at the 2023 UNCF UNITE Summit to a room of students, alumni, and senior officials from Historically Black Colleges & Universities (HBCU).

The summit gave me the platform to discuss the historical connections between the HBCUs and public education on our “Ever Rising: The Renaissance of HBCUs and K-12 Education” panel. The panel also was an opportunity to highlight the potential impact a revival of the connections between HBCUs and K-12 schools could have on dramatically improving educational opportunities for African-American families and students.

The debate over the expansion of public charter schools has divided African-Americans along the lines of those HBCU alumni who’ve attended, served, founded, voted for, or donated to a public charter schools and those African-Americans who characterize public charters as “selective,” “non-public,” and a financial strain on public schools.

UNCF UNITE is the nation’s premier annual gathering for accelerating strategies for African-American higher education and support for the institutional transformation of African-American colleges and universities. UNITE is founded by the United Negro College Fund (UNCF).

The annual gathering is organized by UNCF’s Institute for Capacity Building, whose mission is to partner with Historically Black Colleges & Universities and Predominately Black Institutions to help propel student success, community impact, and the advancement of educational equity and racial justice.

HBCUs punch above their weight. While HBCUs educate only 10% of African-American college students, they produce 50% of African-American Teachers, 85% of African-American Doctors, 80% of African-American Federal Judges, 75% of African-American Veterinarians, and 75% of African-American Military Officers.

The panel created an opportunity to discuss the role HBCUs played in producing an army of educators during the post-Reconstruction era, but also the connection HBCUs had with local K-12 schools. Over 5,000 Rosenwald schools were funded by the Rosenwald Fund, local African-American residents, and local tax dollars during this era. Rosenwald schools were African-American run and located in close proximity to HBCUs, establishing a pipeline of African-American students into HBCUs starving for a pool of capable applicants.

The panel also gave me the opportunity to participant in a rhetorical exercise highlighting how the opposition to public charters has less to do with the actual tenets of model and more to do with the false narratives about school choice. “Do you support autonomy for school leaders to make the best decisions for schools? Do you agree schools should be accountable for results and penalized if they don’t meet expectations? Do you agree parents should have choice in the schools that meet their kids’ needs? If you answered yes to these questions, you support charters…you just don’t like the term.”

HBCUs could and should play a greater role in starting, funding, and holding K-12 school accountable for performance. The most feasible way for HBCUs to improve outcomes for African-American students is to become authorizers for public charter schools.

The panel highlighted the controversy surrounding charter schools and the reluctant adoption by African-American politicians. I made the point that the term “charter” has distracted from the discussion on the importance of the key tenets of charter schools, notably accountability, accountability, and choice that most African-Americans support.

The panel was sponsored by the National Charter Collaborative (NCC) and included:

 

NCC supports single-site charter school leaders of color whose schools reflect the hopes and dreams of their students and cultural fabric of their communities.

NCC believes charter school leaders of color are a critical, yet overlooked, collective representing an estimated one-fourth of charter schools impacting over 335,000 students across the U.S.

UNITE 2023 included pre-conferences, plenaries and breakout sessions focused on institutional transformation, executive leadership, enrollment management, STEM initiatives, mental health, climate action, community empowerment, federal programming, industry collaboration, fundraising and advancement, K-12 partnerships, and career pathways.

To learn more, go to UNITE 2023 and 2022 on our YouTube channel.

Curtis Valentine is the Co-Director of the Reinventing America’s Schools Project at the Progressive Policy Institute.

The Belief Gap: 2023 National Education Summit

“We have a Belief Gap in education.” I uttered those exact words from the main stage of the Smithsonian’s Institute’s Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden for the 2023 Smithsonian National Education Summit.

The summit came at a time when the country was becoming more and more divided along political lines on the topic of education and the teaching of American history. In states like Florida and Texas, elected and appointed leaders in the governor’s office, state legislature, and state board of education introduced and passed laws restricting the teaching of parts of American History that tell the full story of the experiences of marginalized groups like African-Americans, Jewish Americans, and members of the LGBTQ community.

Joining the first African-American Secretary of the Smithsonian Institute to keynote the National Education Summit was an extreme honor for me, especially at a time when educators and parents grapple with the teaching of American history…the good and the bad.

Dr. Lonnie Bunch is not only the first African-American to serve as Secretary of the Smithsonian, he’s also the first historian. As Secretary, Dr. Bunch oversees 21 museums, 21 libraries, the National Zoo, numerous research centers and several education units and centers. Dr. Bunch’s is most famous for founding the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture.

Dr. Bunch and I were joined by Jermar Rountree, the D.C. Teacher of the Year, on the panel. Rountree is a health and physical education teacher at Center City Public Charter School, Brightwood Campus. In the Center City network, Rountree serves as the District teacher lead for the physical education and health department.

This year’s Summit focused on the theme “Together We Thrive: Fostering a Sense of Belonging” and included four learning tracks: Life on a Sustainable Planet, STEAM Education, Reckoning with Our Racial Past, and An Integrated Arts Education.

The panel was moderated by Monique M. Chism, PhD, Under Secretary for Education for the Smithsonian Institution. Dr. Chism’s questions centered on the importance of diversity in teaching and its impact on “fostering belonging” for students.

The Summit attracted thousands of educators from across the nation, including teachers, curriculum specialists, librarians, state education agencies, administrators, and museum and cultural educators. The debate over how to teach American history and when certain parts should be taught is one these summit participants came to Washington to better understand.

The Summit was also an opportunity for me to discuss new research highlighting the impact of teacher diversity but also Collective Teacher Efficacy or the power of a teacher’s belief in their student’s ability and that impact that belief has on student achievement.

I used the summit to highlight the relationship between the teaching of American history and America’s belief gap in education when I said, “teachers don’t believe Black students can succeed and parents don’t believe White students are capable of learning the entirety of American history without internalizing the wrongs of the worst of us. Believe in our students.”

The laws passed in Florida and Texas to restrict the teachings of America history, laws that would criminalize teachers and villainize parents, also subjugate students to an inferior education and make them less prepared for full citizenship.

I take pride in my knowledge of my own history and the impact access to a quality education meant to my family and life outcomes for my relatives. The panel gave me an opportunity to share the story of my great-grandparents, Beverly and Martha Valentine. As co-founders of the Carroll-Boyd Rosenwald School in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, my great-grandparents joined a long line of African-Americans who partnered with the Julius Rosenwald Fund to create nearly 5,000 schools throughout the South.

The historical significance and impact of Rosenwald schools is showcased in not one, but two, exhibits at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture where artifacts from The Hope School in Pomaria, South Carolina are displayed.

The legacy of Rosenwald schools live on in schools today that give school leaders more autonomy in how they are run…charter schools. Stephanie Deutsch, granddaughter in-law to Rosenwald and author of “You Need a Schoolhouse: Booker T. Washington, Julius Rosenwald, and the Building of Schools for the Segregated South,” was asked about the modern-day equivalent of Rosenwald schools and she replied “charter schools.”

Sessions from this year’s summit were produced in collaboration with the Council for Chief State School Officers, D.C. Public Schools, Ford’s Theatre, the Library of Congress, National Council for Teachers of English, National Council for the Social Studies, the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Science Teaching Association, North American Association for Environmental Education, and The Professional Development Collaborative at Washington International School.

Video of full session can be viewed on Smithsonian Education YouTube Channel.

Curtis Valentine is the Co-Director of the Reinventing America’s Schools Project at the Progressive Policy Institute.

PPI’s Trade Fact of the Week: The world labor force has grown by 37 million workers this year.

FACT: The world labor force has grown by 37 million workers this year.

THE NUMBERS: Total world labor force* –

2023    3.602 billion
2022    3.565 billion
2020    3.412 billion*
2010     3.159 billion
2000    2.752 billion

Estimates from ILO, World Employment and Social Outlook 2023; the 2020 total is artificially depressed, down from 3.465 million in 2019 due to temporary Covid-19 pandemic closures.

WHAT THEY MEAN:

The International Labour Organization’s 2023 “World Employment and Social Outlook” reports that each day around the world this year, about 3.43 billion workers arrive at offices, labs, fields, home computers, construction sites, schools, restaurants, market stalls and the like. Adding in the 0.21 billion currently unemployed, this makes for a world labor force of 3.60 billion. This total is up by (a) a third from the 2.75 billion of 2000, (b) 300 million from the 3.12 billion workers of 2010, and (c) by 37 million, or 100,000 workers per day, since last year. Divided by region, the ILO finds 2 billion workers in Asia, 650 million in Africa and the Middle East, 300 million in Latin America, and 500 million in North America, Europe, and the Pacific (with the U.S. labor force, as measured by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, at 167 million). A quick snapshot of the working world of 2023 this Labor Day:

Total world labor force, 2023:        3.640 billion
Employed :                                      3.430 billion
‘Informal’ sector:                              2.100 billion
‘Extreme working poverty’*:              214 million
Unemployed:                                       211 million

* ILO’s definition for extreme working poverty is work at $1.90 per day or less, in constant 2012 dollars

Looking more closely, the ILO’s report suggests three big things about working life: the sharp decline of extreme working poverty; the lag in ‘governance’ and worker protections (though noting better performance in the ‘globalized’ international supply-chain workforce than in purely domestic industries); and the shift of work towards Africa, South Asia, and the Middle East:

1.    The recent past and the decline of deep working poverty – The fortunes of the world’s least privileged workers brightened in the last generation. Per ILO’s data, 667 million workers were extremely poor in 2000 – just over a quarter of that year’s 2.58 billion people with jobs – earning less than $1.90 per day in constant dollars. By 2010 this army of destitute labor had shrunk to 406 million, and as of 2022 (the last year for which ILO has an estimate) it was 214 million, or about one-sixteenth of all workers. From 2000 to 2010, the decline in extreme working poverty was concentrated in East Asia and Southeast Asia. These regions have now nearly eradicated deep working poverty, and the sharpest current decline is in South Asia, whose count of working poor has fallen from 131 million in 2010 to 52 million in 2020, and 34 million in 2022. Most of the world’s very poor workers – 152 million, about two-thirds of the total – are in Africa, but here too trends are promising, as the share of African workers in deep poverty has dropped from 57% in 2000 to 44% in 2010, and 35.5% in 2022.

2.    The present and the persistence of ‘informality’ – Set against a very positive poverty-reduction story is the big ‘policy and governance’ job that hasn’t been done. This is to provide workers with legal rights and protections. The ILO believes 58% of all workers, or 2 billion people, are working ‘informally’ – that is, in jobs either formally excluded from labor laws or de facto outside the labor-law world. This share has barely changed from the 60% estimate for 2010. By occupation, the highest rates of informality are in farm labor (92% of all workers), domestic service (84%), construction (74%), accommodation and food service (61%) and repair shops (60%); so a less technical picture of the world’s informal work is one of 500 million farmworkers, 61 million maids and nannies, and similar armies of day-laborers at construction sites, cooks and dishwashers working ‘under the table’ in small restaurants, and so on. In legal terms they lack holidays, family leave rights, minimum wages, health and safety inspections, and so on. More practically, they are at higher risk (whether to health and safety, or to secure earnings) than their 1.4 billion formal-sector colleagues, and are a lot poorer, earning by the ILO’s estimate 56% as much as formal-sector workers.

Here Asia’s remarkable achievement record in growth and poverty reduction has a shadow in lack of governance and legal protections: East Asia’s informality rate has dropped only from 55% to 48% since 2010, and Southeast Asia’s from 79% to 70%. In South Asia, the ILO’s estimate of informality has actually risen slightly, from 86.3% to 86.8%, meaning formal legal work in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh remains the province of a small and privileged labor aristocracy. North America (which in ILO regional terms means the U.S. and Canada; Mexico is in ‘Latin America and the Caribbean) has the world’s lowest informality rate at 9% of all workers, and western Europe’s is a bit higher at 13%.

2a.    … with a note on ‘globalization’ and supply chains: ILO’s report views economic integration and the development of international supply chains as contributing significantly to the improvement of working life over the last generation, both by providing higher wages and creating an outpost in which ‘informality’ is less common than in purely domestic jobs. Reviewing data for 24 middle-income countries, they conclude that:

“[S]ectors with higher GSC [“global supply-chain”] integration tend to have a larger share of wage and salaries employment, a lower incidence of informality and a lower proportion of low-paid employment – and hence in principle a higher quality of employment.”

This raises an unsettling question about the U.S. government’s approach to international labor issues. U.S. policy focuses intensely on policing supply chains and enforcing labor features of trade agreements. The ILO data, though, suggest that these are already areas where (overall) job quality and pay are well above average. This in turn implies that the U.S.’ work may be missing the areas of greatest current need, and that over-reliance on penalties and sanctions might push poor-country workers into sectors where conditions are generally worse.

3.     Towards the future and the geography of job growth: Finally, turning from the past generation and present challenges to look ahead, the ILO’s report answers a simple question – how many jobs? – with a relatively simple answer ‘34 million more than in 2022’. By region, though (and moving a few pieces around to merge the ILO’s “North Africa” region with its “Arab States”, and combining its counts for North America, Europe, and the Pacific), the answers to this question sharply diverge:

Job Growth 2022- 2023
World                                            +34 million
Sub-Saharan Africa                       +14 million
South Asia                                      +12 million
Southeast Asia                                +5 million
Arab states                                      +3 million
Latin America and Caribbean         +3 million
North America, Europe, Pacific         -1 million
East Asia                                            -1 million

Mirroring demography, these figures show labor force growth slowing in Latin America, turning negative in Europe and East Asia (though still growing a bit in North America), still strong in Southeast Asia and rapidly accelerating in Africa and South Asia. Or, more directly, as Africa has been adding 40,000 jobs per day this year and South Asia 33,000, Europe and East Asia have been dropping about 8,500 jobs daily. All suggesting that the center of growth for the next decade’s world economy, and for the urban working world, is shifting away from traditional ‘developed’ countries and Pacific Rim sites, and toward India, Pakistan, the Middle East, and Africa.

 

FURTHER READING

The International Labour Organization’s “World Employment and Social Outlook 2023.”

Informality –

And an in-depth ILO look at informal workers and businesses.

And the International Monetary Fund has perspective on informality and economic development.

Perspectives around the world –

PPI’s Taylor Maag on American job quality, and apprenticeships as a way to accelerate blue-collar wage growth.

New Delhi-based Just Jobs Network’s Sabina Dewan on technology, equity, and job quality in South Asia and Southeast Asia (together the sites for half of this year’s new jobs).

Cornell prof./former trade/labor negotiator Desiree Leclercq on trade, labor, and the Biden administration.

Kenya’s Ministry of Labour and Social Protection.

And the U.S. Department of Labor’s International Labor Affairs Bureau.

And perspective –

The Department of Labor’s Labor Day retrospective.

 

ABOUT ED

Ed Gresser is Vice President and Director for Trade and Global Markets at PPI.

Ed returns to PPI after working for the think tank from 2001-2011. He most recently served as the Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Trade Policy and Economics at the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). In this position, he led USTR’s economic research unit from 2015-2021, and chaired the 21-agency Trade Policy Staff Committee.

Ed began his career on Capitol Hill before serving USTR as Policy Advisor to USTR Charlene Barshefsky from 1998 to 2001. He then led PPI’s Trade and Global Markets Project from 2001 to 2011. After PPI, he co-founded and directed the independent think tank Progressive Economy until rejoining USTR in 2015. In 2013, the Washington International Trade Association presented him with its Lighthouse Award, awarded annually to an individual or group for significant contributions to trade policy.

Ed is the author of Freedom from Want: American Liberalism and the Global Economy (2007).  He has published in a variety of journals and newspapers, and his research has been cited by leading academics and international organizations including the WTO, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund. He is a graduate of Stanford University and holds a Master’s Degree in International Affairs from Columbia Universities and a certificate from the Averell Harriman Institute for Advanced Study of the Soviet Union.

Read the full email and sign up for the Trade Fact of the Week

Bledsoe for Medium: In Both U.S. and UK, Overtaxing Voters is Bad Climate Politics

By Paul Bledsoe

No political comparison is as discordant to British ears as one suggesting commonality with the American scene, particularly with Donald Trump still at large. Nonetheless, recent UK contretemps over energy taxes and climate policy may find an illustrative corollary in U.S. politics and prove the exception to the rule.

The decision this week by mayor Sadiq Khan to extend the Ultra-low Emissions Zone (ULEZ) tax to almost all of greater London may be justified in terms of helping air quality, but it is still questionable politics for a Labour Party attempting to regain power for the first time in 13 years.

Keep reading in Medium.

Moss for Competition Policy International: The State of Cloud Technology Markets: Challenges for Competition

By Diana Moss

This article unpacks the unique features of the cloud market, including rapid expansion through acquisition, static market structure, and weak merger enforcement. The analysis draws attention to the important link between market structure and conduct and its implications for strategic incentives around market positioning, entry and expansion by smaller rivals, and innovation competition.

A major implication is that competition enforcers and policymakers should pursue vigorous merger enforcement, at the same time they look carefully to identify competitive concerns around strategic conduct that could potentially hamper competition in cloud technology.

Read the full piece in Competition Policy International.

Weinstein for Forbes: Administrative Bloat At U.S. Colleges Is Skyrocketing

By Paul Weinstein Jr.

Basic economics tells us that when demand goes down, suppliers must reduce costs, cut supply, or lower prices to survive. That is the choice facing many U.S. colleges and universities starting in 2025, when the so-called “enrollment cliff,” begins. Between 2025 to 2029, undergraduate headcount will drop by over 575,000 students (15 percent) and, if recent history is an indicator, many schools will end up closing their doors rather than streamlining their operations.

The reason is that most institutions of higher learning are dependent on tuition revenue for survival. While a handful of elite universities (think Harvard, Stanford, Princeton) have endowments large enough to cover the cost of attendance for any student in need, the rest require undergrads to borrow on average over $30,000 to earn a bachelors.

In the past, when faced with funding shortfalls, colleges and universities attempted to “grow their way” out of the problem by opening up new sources of revenue. Many launched new graduate programs, including terminal master’s degrees (no doctoral option) and certificates. Others increased their online offerings to expand their access to part-time students beyond the gates of their campuses. And almost all opened their doors to international students who could afford to pay full price.

But unlike Purdue University—who used this new source of revenue to hold undergraduate tuition flat for a decade—most schools went on a hiring spree; one that massively expanded the ranks of all types of employees, with one notable exception—full-time faculty.

Keep reading in Forbes.

PPI’s Trade Fact of the Week: First round of the globalization debate: 90 BC.

FACT: First round of the globalization debate: 90 BC.

THE NUMBERS: Dates –

Lao Tzu: 300 BCE?
Sima Qian: 90 BCE

WHAT THEY MEAN:

A “globalization” exchange from the Chinese classics A-list:

Writing in the seventh Han Dynasty reign (~90 BCE by the western calendar), Grand Historian Sima Qian takes a tolerantly pro-consumer “neoliberal” position as he pans a famous romantic-localist passage from the Tao Te Ch’ing:

Sima Qian: “There must be farmers to produce food, men to extract the wealth of mountains and marshes, artisans to process these things, and merchants to circulate them. There is no need to wait for government orders: each man will do his part as he gets what he desires. So cheap goods will go where they fetch more, while expensive goods will make men search for cheap ones. When all work willingly at their trades, just as water flows ceaselessly downhill day and night, things will appear unsought and people will produce them without being asked.

“[But] Lao Tzu has said that under the ideal form of government:

‘Though states exist side by side, so close they can hear the crowing of each other’s roosters and the barking of each other’s dogs, the people of each state will savor their own food, admire their own clothing, be content with their own customs and delight in their own occupations, and will grow old without ever wandering abroad.’

“Yet if one were to apply this type of government, striving to draw the present age back to the conditions of primitive times and close the eyes and ears of the people, I doubt one would have much success. From ancient times to the present, eyes and ears have longed for the most beautiful forms and sounds, bodies delighted in pleasure and luxury, and hearts swelled with pride at the glory of power and ability. So long have these habits been allowed to permeate the lives of the people, that even if one were to go from door to door preaching [Lao Tzu’s] most subtle arguments, he could never succeed in changing them. Therefore, the highest type of government accepts the nature of the people, the next best leads the people to what is beneficial, the next gives them instruction and orders, and the very worst compels them to act against their nature.”

FURTHER READING

From the 90 BCE debate to a 2023 summer-reading reprise –

Historian Tara Zahra’s Against the World: Anti-Globalism Between the Wars (PPI trade staff’s choice for best 2023 global-economy book) looks at anti-globalization’s advocates, critics, and effects in the 1930s.

… and Financial Times columnist Rana Foroohar’s Homecoming pitches industrial anti-globalism as a 2020s program.

And back to the classics –

Lao Tzu’s Tao Te Ch’ing (Waley translation, see chapter 80 for the roosters and dogs).

Sima Qian on kings, sages, assassins, merchants, tyrants, economics, and more (Watson translation; see Shi Ji Chapter 129 for the Lao Tzu evaluation and Sima’s survey of early-empire economics and business).

The same author’s panoramic look at the Warring States, the First Emperor (the one with the terra-cotta army), and the rise and fall of the Qin Dynasty.

& a P.S.: What was the point of the army? Edward Burman’s review of recent scholarship.

 

ABOUT ED

Ed Gresser is Vice President and Director for Trade and Global Markets at PPI.

Ed returns to PPI after working for the think tank from 2001-2011. He most recently served as the Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Trade Policy and Economics at the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). In this position, he led USTR’s economic research unit from 2015-2021, and chaired the 21-agency Trade Policy Staff Committee.

Ed began his career on Capitol Hill before serving USTR as Policy Advisor to USTR Charlene Barshefsky from 1998 to 2001. He then led PPI’s Trade and Global Markets Project from 2001 to 2011. After PPI, he co-founded and directed the independent think tank Progressive Economy until rejoining USTR in 2015. In 2013, the Washington International Trade Association presented him with its Lighthouse Award, awarded annually to an individual or group for significant contributions to trade policy.

Ed is the author of Freedom from Want: American Liberalism and the Global Economy (2007).  He has published in a variety of journals and newspapers, and his research has been cited by leading academics and international organizations including the WTO, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund. He is a graduate of Stanford University and holds a Master’s Degree in International Affairs from Columbia Universities and a certificate from the Averell Harriman Institute for Advanced Study of the Soviet Union.

Read the full email and sign up for the Trade Fact of the Week